Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am at a point where Epstein is a more palatable alternative than Straus and I am a bleeding heart tree hugging liberal. Run someone ELSE and I will vote for them.
If that is true, you need to get educated about who you're voting for, and this thread ought to scare you away from voting for Epstein... This is a person who (as someone else pointed out) has always supported LOWER funding for our schools in order to please her Tea Party friends who don't like taxes (Who likes taxes anyway? But I digress...) Then because she can't say she's going to raise taxes, she will promise she'll deliver stuff for her community by taking it from those who, in her view, have too much -- e.g. those in the poorer parts of the County.
If you are really a bleeding-heart liberal, you should not vote for this person. Be frustrated with Straus, but this is really making a deal with the devil. And she won't be able to deliver any better than anybody else, especially given her apparently abrasive politics of personal destruction. Read any number of posts from the last election and you'll see people talk about this...
Anonymous wrote:Strauss has protected her constituency from boundary issues and she thinks she has done her job.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am at a point where Epstein is a more palatable alternative than Straus and I am a bleeding heart tree hugging liberal. Run someone ELSE and I will vote for them.
If that is true, you need to get educated about who you're voting for, and this thread ought to scare you away from voting for Epstein... This is a person who (as someone else pointed out) has always supported LOWER funding for our schools in order to please her Tea Party friends who don't like taxes (Who likes taxes anyway? But I digress...) Then because she can't say she's going to raise taxes, she will promise she'll deliver stuff for her community by taking it from those who, in her view, have too much -- e.g. those in the poorer parts of the County.
If you are really a bleeding-heart liberal, you should not vote for this person. Be frustrated with Straus, but this is really making a deal with the devil. And she won't be able to deliver any better than anybody else, especially given her apparently abrasive politics of personal destruction. Read any number of posts from the last election and you'll see people talk about this...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am at a point where Epstein is a more palatable alternative than Straus and I am a bleeding heart tree hugging liberal. Run someone ELSE and I will vote for them.
If that is true, you need to get educated about who you're voting for, and this thread ought to scare you away from voting for Epstein... This is a person who (as someone else pointed out) has always supported LOWER funding for our schools in order to please her Tea Party friends who don't like taxes (Who likes taxes anyway? But I digress...) Then because she can't say she's going to raise taxes, she will promise she'll deliver stuff for her community by taking it from those who, in her view, have too much -- e.g. those in the poorer parts of the County.
If you are really a bleeding-heart liberal, you should not vote for this person. Be frustrated with Straus, but this is really making a deal with the devil. And she won't be able to deliver any better than anybody else, especially given her apparently abrasive politics of personal destruction. Read any number of posts from the last election and you'll see people talk about this...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am at a point where Epstein is a more palatable alternative than Straus and I am a bleeding heart tree hugging liberal. Run someone ELSE and I will vote for them.
If that is true, you need to get educated about who you're voting for, and this thread ought to scare you away from voting for Epstein... This is a person who (as someone else pointed out) has always supported LOWER funding for our schools in order to please her Tea Party friends who don't like taxes (Who likes taxes anyway? But I digress...) Then because she can't say she's going to raise taxes, she will promise she'll deliver stuff for her community by taking it from those who, in her view, have too much -- e.g. those in the poorer parts of the County.
If you are really a bleeding-heart liberal, you should not vote for this person. Be frustrated with Straus, but this is really making a deal with the devil. And she won't be able to deliver any better than anybody else, especially given her apparently abrasive politics of personal destruction. Read any number of posts from the last election and you'll see people talk about this...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Well if they come in to kindergarten not knowing their basic colors in their native language,
The above post was not about ESOL kids.
Whatever their race or ethnicity, if poor kids come in not knowing their colors and by 3rd grade can get a 60% on a 3rd grade SOL, I consider that success.
Anonymous wrote:I am at a point where Epstein is a more palatable alternative than Straus and I am a bleeding heart tree hugging liberal. Run someone ELSE and I will vote for them.
Whatever their race or ethnicity, if poor kids come in not knowing their colors and by 3rd grade can get a 60% on a 3rd grade SOL, I consider that success.
Anonymous wrote:Well if they come in to kindergarten not knowing their basic colors in their native language,
The above post was not about ESOL kids.
Well if they come in to kindergarten not knowing their basic colors in their native language,
Don't be shy.Anonymous wrote:
Perhaps it's time to get this country's immigration issue under control. There are SOOOO many schools nationwide that are severely overcrowded and failing miserably at educating ESOL students that then it brings down the whole school system for everyone. Miami, Phoenix, LA, NYC and Boston suburbs etc... for example
Perhaps we need to close the border for those not being able to speak English at a certain proficiency until the schools have dug itself out of these holes.
Agree--but I suspect there is another group at Bucknell that is not making the scores they should.
Anonymous wrote:
seems unfair to kids coming in as well to have to reach such a high level. You think they'd give the kids and schools some leeway like making 1 1/2-2 years of progress each year to catch up instead of trying to cover 3 years of education in a year.
Sadly, it doesn't work that way. Far more likely that they will make far less progress. So many things operating against them.