Well, WAY back in the day, each school district had its own standards. In fact, when I was growing up (in the 70s) I'm pretty sure there weren't any standards set in my school -- teachers just decided what they wanted to teach, basically )they were given textbooks). Some teachers went faster and covered the whole book, others took side trips because they were interested in Science or really loved poetry. One teacher loved to put on plays so all year long we just did a bunch of plays. The experience from teacher to teacher was very different, depending on who you happened to get.
Anonymous wrote:In addition, the school districts might tell me I have to use a certain junky curriculum, but if I can prove that my methods work better, I should be able to use them -- after all my kids test scores (and my job!) are on the line. I deserve the right to use materials that will work better than whatever junk they provide. (If the argument is the pearson written curriculum is bad)
You mean like teachers did back in the day? I taught primary grades--we always worked together and developed materials. But, now, with standardization it is quite different.
In addition, the school districts might tell me I have to use a certain junky curriculum, but if I can prove that my methods work better, I should be able to use them -- after all my kids test scores (and my job!) are on the line. I deserve the right to use materials that will work better than whatever junk they provide. (If the argument is the pearson written curriculum is bad)
Anonymous wrote:If they are upset about corporations getting involved in public education then where have they been for the last 75 years given corporations have driven textbooks and curricula? They have been there all along.
Teachers have been complaining about this for years. The standardized tests developed by publishers will be even more dependent on the texts developed by publishers.
Oh, that is such bullshit. In this day and age of Wikis and ubiquitous information technology there's absolutely NO REASON why teachers couldn't band together and create collaborative open source textbooks, content and curriculum, put the textbook companies out of business and save taxpayers tens of millions of dollars.
Oh, that is such bullshit. In this day and age of Wikis and ubiquitous information technology there's absolutely NO REASON why teachers couldn't band together and create collaborative open source textbooks, content and curriculum, put the textbook companies out of business and save taxpayers tens of millions of dollars.
You are worried about insulting second-graders on a math test by asking them questions they may consider dumb? That's thoughtful of you.
Believe me, kids know a stupid question when they see it.
Anonymous wrote:If they are upset about corporations getting involved in public education then where have they been for the last 75 years given corporations have driven textbooks and curricula? They have been there all along.
Teachers have been complaining about this for years. The standardized tests developed by publishers will be even more dependent on the texts developed by publishers.
If they are upset about corporations getting involved in public education then where have they been for the last 75 years given corporations have driven textbooks and curricula? They have been there all along.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don't think that this is an accurate description. The outrage from the left doesn't come specifically from the teachers' unions; it comes from people who oppose corporations getting involved in public education (which includes standardized testing, for-profit charter schools, value-added evaluation systems, and so on), as well as people who believe that there shouldn't be any standards or requirements or homework or testing. And, really, the corporatization of public education preceded the Common Core, and making the Common Core go away won't make the corporatization go away.
If they are upset about corporations getting involved in public education then where have they been for the last 75 years given corporations have driven textbooks and curricula? They have been there all along.
Where have they been all this time when the biggest racket has been in massive expenditures in private sector contracts for school buildings, maintenance contracts, et cetera? I'm not sure I buy this sudden outrage.
Anonymous wrote:)Why not addition? Because you're not adding, you're taking away