Anonymous wrote:The only schools that have 20% acceptance rates to Ivies are the elite boarding schools in the NE (Andover, Choate...). Maybe some big city magnets.
Anonymous wrote:17:22 again.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: ... I actually suspect private school Ivy acceptances are MORE likely to be legacies. Like I said, the year I graduated, at least 80% of the Harvard admissions from my private school were legacies. That's WAY more than 10-12% of each class they say are legacies.
I don't have any data on how many Ivy alums choose private vs. public for their kids, but it seems plausible to me that Ivy alums might be more likely to be financially in a position to send their kids to private schools.
I agree with you, that private school Ivy acceptances are more likely to be legacies. ...
I'm not so sure I agree. Here's how I think through the math ...
If a private school has 100 seniors, maybe 25% might get an Ivy legacy connection from at least one parent (25 students). If 20% of the 100 seniors are admitted to Ivy colleges (20 students), what % of those are likely to be legacies? Based on what PP wrote, let's assume 80%, or 16 students.
At one of the W public schools with 400 seniors, how many will have one Ivy educated parent? Let's assume 40 of 400 (10%). You might have 10 students admitted to Ivy colleges. How many of those 10 students will come from one of the 40 Ivy educated families? I'd be willing to bet it's close to 80% too.
We obviously can bicker about the numbers, and these are just my rough guesses. But my underlying point is that many of the public school Ivy admits are likely legacies too. It's disingenuous to pretend Ivy parents don't send their children to public schools, and that those legacies don't seek admission to the Ivy colleges.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote: ... I actually suspect private school Ivy acceptances are MORE likely to be legacies. Like I said, the year I graduated, at least 80% of the Harvard admissions from my private school were legacies. That's WAY more than 10-12% of each class they say are legacies.
I don't have any data on how many Ivy alums choose private vs. public for their kids, but it seems plausible to me that Ivy alums might be more likely to be financially in a position to send their kids to private schools.
I agree with you, that private school Ivy acceptances are more likely to be legacies. ...
Anonymous wrote:[
The email trail is confusing, but I did say that I applied from a private school -- the bolded parts are all one poster (me).
I actually suspect private school Ivy acceptances are MORE likely to be legacies. Like I said, the year I graduated, at least 80% of the Harvard admissions from my private school were legacies. That's WAY more than 10-12% of each class they say are legacies.
I don't have any data on how many Ivy alums choose private vs. public for their kids, but it seems plausible to me that Ivy alums might be more likely to be financially in a position to send their kids to private schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op been there...a simple answer without too many reasons (made that mistake and the more reasons I gave it seems the more I offended them - understandably). If the private is religious at all you can say "we wanted the religious aspect incorporated into school," as I have had others say to me. Could also say "My child does better in smaller classrooms."
You don't need to play the religion card. You and the person asking know the private school is the better school all things considered (just look at the abysmal numbers for DC public and public charter schools on the National Center for Education Statistics website). You chose to make the enormous sacrifices you had to in order to send your kid private or you were one of the lucky few who got financial aid. What it shows is where your priorities lie.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't find current stats, but when I attended Harvard some years back, fully 2/3 of the student body came from public high schools. And of the five of us who went to Harvard from my "big three" DC private, at least four were legacies. (The fifth might have been, too -- I just don't know.)
When I read comments like these, I always wonder how many of the public school students admitted to top colleges are legacies too.
It doesn't seem likely that Harvard would fill 2/3 of the student body with legacy public school kids. Last I heard, Harvard accepts maybe 1/3 of legacy applicants but together these constitute about 10-12% of any incoming class. Surely many of those kids (private as well as public) got in on their own smarts.
Sorry, I wasn't suggesting the public school admissions were legacies -- on the contrary, I meant to suggest that the relatively high rate of Ivy acceptances at top privates might be attributable, in large part, to legacy status (which isn't information high schools include on their matriculation lists).
I'm no dunce -- I got into Columbia on my own merits -- but I'm sure my legacy status tipped the balance to get me into Harvard. (Certainly my college guidance counselor thought so!)
Perfect example: Poster is one person, accepted at 2 Ivies. So that means that even less than the 30 or so listed are actual different students. Of course, to combat the "legacy" at private you have the URM at public.
Wow. Dog with a bone. Too bad PP didn't identify whether she was applying from public vs. private herself -- that would have given your paranoid innumeracy a little more legitimacy, no?
(And PP obviously didn't graduate in 2013 like the rest of those 36 kids, but clearly you're pretty much beyond hope when it comes to thinking about numbers like this.)
Anonymous wrote:Op been there...a simple answer without too many reasons (made that mistake and the more reasons I gave it seems the more I offended them - understandably). If the private is religious at all you can say "we wanted the religious aspect incorporated into school," as I have had others say to me. Could also say "My child does better in smaller classrooms."
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't find current stats, but when I attended Harvard some years back, fully 2/3 of the student body came from public high schools. And of the five of us who went to Harvard from my "big three" DC private, at least four were legacies. (The fifth might have been, too -- I just don't know.)
When I read comments like these, I always wonder how many of the public school students admitted to top colleges are legacies too.
It doesn't seem likely that Harvard would fill 2/3 of the student body with legacy public school kids. Last I heard, Harvard accepts maybe 1/3 of legacy applicants but together these constitute about 10-12% of any incoming class. Surely many of those kids (private as well as public) got in on their own smarts.
Sorry, I wasn't suggesting the public school admissions were legacies -- on the contrary, I meant to suggest that the relatively high rate of Ivy acceptances at top privates might be attributable, in large part, to legacy status (which isn't information high schools include on their matriculation lists).
I'm no dunce -- I got into Columbia on my own merits -- but I'm sure my legacy status tipped the balance to get me into Harvard. (Certainly my college guidance counselor thought so!)
Perfect example: Poster is one person, accepted at 2 Ivies. So that means that even less than the 30 or so listed are actual different students. Of course, to combat the "legacy" at private you have the URM at public.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I can't find current stats, but when I attended Harvard some years back, fully 2/3 of the student body came from public high schools. And of the five of us who went to Harvard from my "big three" DC private, at least four were legacies. (The fifth might have been, too -- I just don't know.)
When I read comments like these, I always wonder how many of the public school students admitted to top colleges are legacies too.
It doesn't seem likely that Harvard would fill 2/3 of the student body with legacy public school kids. Last I heard, Harvard accepts maybe 1/3 of legacy applicants but together these constitute about 10-12% of any incoming class. Surely many of those kids (private as well as public) got in on their own smarts.
Sorry, I wasn't suggesting the public school admissions were legacies -- on the contrary, I meant to suggest that the relatively high rate of Ivy acceptances at top privates might be attributable, in large part, to legacy status (which isn't information high schools include on their matriculation lists).
I'm no dunce -- I got into Columbia on my own merits -- but I'm sure my legacy status tipped the balance to get me into Harvard. (Certainly my college guidance counselor thought so!)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:+1. You nailed it with "the public schools just aren't set up for PR and customer service." In fact, the whole culture can really make many parents feel unwelcome and disengaged.
That was my post. I don't agree that the public school culture makes parents feel disengaged. We don't feel this way, and we don't know any parents who do, although obviously it's easy enough to not participate at all in the school life. We actually feel more loyal to the public school than to our kids' previous private school -- I'm not sure why, perhaps because the public school feels more "real" or maybe because we're receiving instead of buying. I guess I can't explain it. But "so-so customer service" =/= disengaged parents.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I'm honest about it and say, "because the local school we're assigned to is complete shit." My tax dollars don't pay for what I want, so I have to come out of pocket.
How many times have you posted this same thing on this thread so far? Curious.
You may have one in private and one in public, but you are the exception. Most posters on this thread say they are public school parents who think private school parents are stupid, or social climbers, or whatever.
Anonymous wrote:+1. You nailed it with "the public schools just aren't set up for PR and customer service." In fact, the whole culture can really make many parents feel unwelcome and disengaged.