Anonymous
Post 10/25/2013 11:36     Subject: WAPO article about sever FFX school budget cuts

Anonymous wrote:[I beg to differ. This is talking about where to cut the wasted tax dollars in FCPS schools. Looking for $148 million in cuts FY2014. AAP in elementary schools would be a good chunk to start with. It is not necessary and as it exist today a waste of $10million in tax dollars. Not to mention it is creating a community of divisiness, putting a lot of stress on very young children, offering a better education to a select few, creating wasteful spending, creating elitist entitled children, and bottom line wasting my tax dollars!!!


no, those who need it benefit from it very much. State law requires a special program for advanced learners. A few disgruntled people like yourself not withstanding, AAP and TJ are an understandable source of pride for the FCPS.


True: for GIFTED learners, not your average good student-learners!! When AAP students are outnumbering GE students, the system has run amok.


Do you mean at AAP centers? You know that the AAP kids there come from several schools, right?


Umm, yes I do know this. But do you know that center schools are also neighborhood schools for the kids who live in-boundary? And for those kids, many of whom are in GE, the AAP center model is a pretty unpleasant place to go to school. The majority of kids there are in AAP and if you're in GE, your class is considered "less-than". I'm wondering how you would (honestly) feel if you had a GE child who was very smart, but not in AAP, and who came home wondering why he or she was somehow considered less intelligent than the other kids simply by virtue of what class he or she was in. I imagine you'd be pretty pissed about it.


I'm sure that I wouldn't be happy if this was my situation (and it may be with my younger child). Does your child not feel very smart within his/her own classroom, like the "big fish"? Would it really be better if the neighborhood kids who qualified for AAP were mixed back in with the rest from the neighborhood and your child might be in a lower reading group, math group, etc.? Could he/she not feel overshadowed in that way?


We are in this situation - overall 80% kid in the GE at an AAP center school. We have had a really difficult time with DC not feeling less than for being in GE. After the first day of school, DC came home and said, "I used to think I was smart. Why am I not in AAP? If AAP is for advanced academics, and I'm not in it, then I must not be very smart." The school has been working very hard at trying to get DC to feel good about being in GE. We're almost finished with the first quarter, and DC still stays regularly that DC wants to be in AAP.

DC does not feel like a "big fish" in the GE class, DC feels like the GE pond is for the dumb kids. DC feels like the GE students are not as smart as the mixed class from the year earlier. DC was in the pull-out math group in 1st and 2nd, so DC is really annoyed that the students who were not in the AAP level II math for 1st and 2nd are now in a more advanced class. DC doesn't feel overshadowed at all - DC is just thinks it's not fair that some children are in another class that DC wants to be in.

People say that beng in the GE in an AAP center school can benefit your GE child. We have not found this to be the case. Even though DC is very strong in math, the school will not let GE students mix with the AAP students for math. The school has created an advanced track through flex-grouping within GE for advanced math. However, the group only works one grade level ahead. If DC was in AAP, DC could work in the most advanced math group. So far, we have found no benefit to DC being a GE student in a center school.


Let your kid know - this is the real world. A lot of people are smarter than you no matter how smart you are. He will learn it sooner or later whether he is in center school or not. However, high IQ doesn't mean much in terms of having a successful career or a happy life. Teach him to value hard work and improve his EQ.


The CogAt/FxAT does not measure IQ; these are simply reasoning tests. http://www.riverpub.com/products/cogAt/support.html#4 So scoring high on them does not necessarily indicate a high IQ. Many GE kids are equally intelligent, but just missed the benchmark on those tests. This is why GE students, within center schools especially, feel the stark division of AAP/GE so acutely. It's obvious that most of their AAP counterparts are no "smarter" than they, and yet they (the AAP kids) are receiving special services. This is a program that needs to be cut or deeply overhauled.


If the kids just missed the benchmark, why would their parents not have parent referred?

Speaking as one of those parents, we didn't parent refer because we don't feel AAP is the end-all be-all. AAP is not that much more "advanced" than GE, and we didn't want to go through the whole referral process just so our child could have a meaningless label.
Anonymous
Post 10/25/2013 11:17     Subject: Re:WAPO article about sever FFX school budget cuts

Anonymous wrote:Do you really believe there are that many highly gifted kids in FCPS?


Not highly gifted (IQ 138-145), no. But gifted (IQ 130-138), yes.

http://www.hoagiesgifted.org/highly_profoundly.htm

I think people get confused about the term "gifted" and think it means "genius," but it does not.
Anonymous
Post 10/25/2013 11:06     Subject: Re:WAPO article about sever FFX school budget cuts

Anonymous wrote:Do you really believe there are that many highly gifted kids in FCPS?


Yes
Anonymous
Post 10/25/2013 11:05     Subject: Re:WAPO article about sever FFX school budget cuts

Anonymous wrote:Do you really believe there are that many highly gifted kids in FCPS?


Obviously a lot of posters on DCUM do not. But if the testing/scoring is against a national average rather than a regional average, I don't think it's surprising that there's a very large number of "gifted" kids in this particular area. Isn't that why people move here?
Anonymous
Post 10/25/2013 11:02     Subject: Re:WAPO article about sever FFX school budget cuts

Do you really believe there are that many highly gifted kids in FCPS?
Anonymous
Post 10/25/2013 11:00     Subject: Re:WAPO article about sever FFX school budget cuts

Anonymous wrote:The Rochester Sage article is an op-ed. The study cited in the other one gives mixed conclusions and does not include any data on the research or methodology, except for the number of kids and number of schools.


I've looked for research on either side (gifted education helps all, or gifted education hurts those classified as non-gifted) and don't see anything better. Please post links if you find anything. I am not wedded to either side.

One I found:

Playing Favorites: Gifted Education and the Disruption of Community

But it was heavily criticized in reviews and the research was deemed inadequate (sample mostly from one school in the Midwest in the 1980s). Not sure if it would apply at all to FCPS since so much is done to have tests like NNAT that don't depend on being an English speaker or having any prior knowledge. I don't think that most of the criticism of AAP is about lack of inclusion of certain races.

http://www.amazon.com/Playing-Favorites-Education-Disruption-Community/dp/0791419800/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1382712921&sr=8-1&keywords=Playing+Favorites%3A+Gifted+Education+and+the+Disruption+of+Community
Anonymous
Post 10/25/2013 10:49     Subject: Re:WAPO article about sever FFX school budget cuts

Anonymous wrote:The biggest problem with your above cited research is that the AAP program is NOT GT. You just want to think it is.


It is GT. The name was changed only to make clear that the gifts needed to be academic and not sports, music, art. The target IQ is the same as for GT programs throughout the nation. FCPS can't afford WISC for all so has to make do with NNAT and CogAT. When WISC is submitted it needs to meet the same identification criteria as for any GT programs.
Anonymous
Post 10/25/2013 10:44     Subject: Re:WAPO article about sever FFX school budget cuts

The Rochester Sage article is an op-ed. The study cited in the other one gives mixed conclusions and does not include any data on the research or methodology, except for the number of kids and number of schools.
Anonymous
Post 10/25/2013 10:37     Subject: Re:WAPO article about sever FFX school budget cuts

The biggest problem with your above cited research is that the AAP program is NOT GT. You just want to think it is.
Anonymous
Post 10/25/2013 10:14     Subject: Re:WAPO article about sever FFX school budget cuts

Anonymous wrote:
I'm sure that I wouldn't be happy if this was my situation (and it may be with my younger child). Does your child not feel very smart within his/her own classroom, like the "big fish"? Would it really be better if the neighborhood kids who qualified for AAP were mixed back in with the rest from the neighborhood and your child might be in a lower reading group, math group, etc.? Could he/she not feel overshadowed in that way?



What an arrogant statement from someone who has no understanding of kids.


Why is it arrogant? Please explain the thinking of kids.

From earlier posts:

Gifted Education Benefits Everyone
http://rochestersage.org/why-gifted-education

"Pulling out the gifted and advanced students also allows other students to answer more questions and to gain self-esteem by becoming top performers."

The Effects of Group Composition on Gifted and Non-Gifted Elementary Students in Cooperative Learning Groups
http://www.gifted.uconn.edu/nrcgt/kennarch.html

"At the same time, the non-gifted student does not experience an increase in achievement due to the presence of a gifted student. Thus, the view of the gifted child as a teaching resource was not supported. However, the non-gifted student in heterogeneous groups suffers from a decline in self-esteem and a decline in the perception by non-gifted peers on task-relevant activities."

Anonymous
Post 10/25/2013 10:07     Subject: WAPO article about sever FFX school budget cuts

Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:17 pages? I knew it - the AAP crazies got out of their pen again.


I beg to differ. This is talking about where to cut the wasted tax dollars in FCPS schools. Looking for $148 million in cuts FY2014. AAP in elementary schools would be a good chunk to start with. It is not necessary and as it exist today a waste of $10million in tax dollars. Not to mention it is creating a community of divisiness, putting a lot of stress on very young children, offering a better education to a select few, creating wasteful spending, creating elitist entitled children, and bottom line wasting my tax dollars!!!


no, those who need it benefit from it very much. State law requires a special program for advanced learners. A few disgruntled people like yourself not withstanding, AAP and TJ are an understandable source of pride for the FCPS.


True: for GIFTED learners, not your average good student-learners!! When AAP students are outnumbering GE students, the system has run amok.


Do you mean at AAP centers? You know that the AAP kids there come from several schools, right?


Umm, yes I do know this. But do you know that center schools are also neighborhood schools for the kids who live in-boundary? And for those kids, many of whom are in GE, the AAP center model is a pretty unpleasant place to go to school. The majority of kids there are in AAP and if you're in GE, your class is considered "less-than". I'm wondering how you would (honestly) feel if you had a GE child who was very smart, but not in AAP, and who came home wondering why he or she was somehow considered less intelligent than the other kids simply by virtue of what class he or she was in. I imagine you'd be pretty pissed about it.


I'm sure that I wouldn't be happy if this was my situation (and it may be with my younger child). Does your child not feel very smart within his/her own classroom, like the "big fish"? Would it really be better if the neighborhood kids who qualified for AAP were mixed back in with the rest from the neighborhood and your child might be in a lower reading group, math group, etc.? Could he/she not feel overshadowed in that way?


We are in this situation - overall 80% kid in the GE at an AAP center school. We have had a really difficult time with DC not feeling less than for being in GE. After the first day of school, DC came home and said, "I used to think I was smart. Why am I not in AAP? If AAP is for advanced academics, and I'm not in it, then I must not be very smart." The school has been working very hard at trying to get DC to feel good about being in GE. We're almost finished with the first quarter, and DC still stays regularly that DC wants to be in AAP.

DC does not feel like a "big fish" in the GE class, DC feels like the GE pond is for the dumb kids. DC feels like the GE students are not as smart as the mixed class from the year earlier. DC was in the pull-out math group in 1st and 2nd, so DC is really annoyed that the students who were not in the AAP level II math for 1st and 2nd are now in a more advanced class. DC doesn't feel overshadowed at all - DC is just thinks it's not fair that some children are in another class that DC wants to be in.

People say that beng in the GE in an AAP center school can benefit your GE child. We have not found this to be the case. Even though DC is very strong in math, the school will not let GE students mix with the AAP students for math. The school has created an advanced track through flex-grouping within GE for advanced math. However, the group only works one grade level ahead. If DC was in AAP, DC could work in the most advanced math group. So far, we have found no benefit to DC being a GE student in a center school.


Let your kid know - this is the real world. A lot of people are smarter than you no matter how smart you are. He will learn it sooner or later whether he is in center school or not. However, high IQ doesn't mean much in terms of having a successful career or a happy life. Teach him to value hard work and improve his EQ.


The CogAt/FxAT does not measure IQ; these are simply reasoning tests. http://www.riverpub.com/products/cogAt/support.html#4 So scoring high on them does not necessarily indicate a high IQ. Many GE kids are equally intelligent, but just missed the benchmark on those tests. This is why GE students, within center schools especially, feel the stark division of AAP/GE so acutely. It's obvious that most of their AAP counterparts are no "smarter" than they, and yet they (the AAP kids) are receiving special services. This is a program that needs to be cut or deeply overhauled.


If the kids just missed the benchmark, why would their parents not have parent referred?
Anonymous
Post 10/25/2013 09:43     Subject: Re:WAPO article about sever FFX school budget cuts

The school board and BOS need to make it very clear how much taxes would increase to pay an extra $140 million. For a renter, a home worth $200,000, $500,000, and $1 million. I bet it isn't that much, but don't know for sure. People can support increases in taxes when they know what the actual costs are to themselves.
Anonymous
Post 10/25/2013 09:18     Subject: Re:WAPO article about sever FFX school budget cuts

Even though it's easy to jump on the AAP centers, because no one will accuse you of not being PC and supportive, we need to stop scapegoating. The AAP kids are not really using more resources other than transportation. They just happen to be grouped together. Otherwise, same use of a teacher, same use of a classroom.



It also requires more bureaucracy within FCPS.
Anonymous
Post 10/25/2013 09:17     Subject: Re:WAPO article about sever FFX school budget cuts

Yes, I made this same point several pages ago and we keep coming back to AAP - it's between $5 and $10 million (maybe). If you don't like AAP, there's a whole other forum just about AAP. Whether it should be changed or not is not exactly the major issue related to the system's budget. This thread could actually generate some good ideas, or consensus, etc...that could be used to lobby the county and the school board. Getting stuck on AAP is derailing that effort (and I actually agree AAP needs changes - I just think it's the tail wagging the dog when you are talking about this budget situation).

Tell me how you get to $140 million in cuts that don't hurt (a lot) - I can't get there. I know some previous posters have pointed out that we shouldn't dismiss small cuts because they can add up and that's true enough, but while we all have a program here or there we think could be cut - can you get to $140 w/o cutting a lot of stuff you do think is important?

The school board can't just pick here and there - they have to figure out how to get to the total amount in cuts.

I think that level of cuts is going to be very painful and bad for the quality of the school system. Various folks on this thread have talked about cutting ESOL (not going to happen and would have all kinds of negative consequences), art, music, reading specialists, AAP, etc...

A school system that didn't have those things would not be one ranked highly nationally or one that would be considered to be implementing best practices.
Anonymous
Post 10/25/2013 09:17     Subject: Re:WAPO article about sever FFX school budget cuts

Even though it's easy to jump on the AAP centers, because no one will accuse you of not being PC and supportive, we need to stop scapegoating. The AAP kids are not really using more resources other than transportation. They just happen to be grouped together. Otherwise, same use of a teacher, same use of a classroom.



Not exactly true. It skews the population of a school and makes staffing more difficult with the numbers.