Anonymous wrote:I often wonder if using explosives dogs would be an option. I don’t know how many people a dog can process or how long they can go without a rest, but they can detect ammunition with amazing alacrity.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only issue I have with metal detectors is the amount of things students are ALLOWED to have that will set them off. It will take like 45-60 minutes to screen kids one by one to enter the building like a TSA process
At JR HS (NW DC) it takes ~ an hour to get students in in the morning
I’m not sure the lives saved through metal detectors would exceed the lives lost through depriving HS kids of an hour of sleep. There’s a lot of evidence showing that decreased sleep for HS kids leads to adverse health outcomes including car accidents.
Additional security officers and SROs seems like a no brainer to me and has th added benefit of allowing them to reopen bathroom.
They also need a better solution for kids that have criminal cases and violent histories. Like maybe virtual school.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My HS drafted a community letter that is going out at some point today.
Churchill?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The only issue I have with metal detectors is the amount of things students are ALLOWED to have that will set them off. It will take like 45-60 minutes to screen kids one by one to enter the building like a TSA process
At JR HS (NW DC) it takes ~ an hour to get students in in the morning
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Return SROs - principals NEVER wanted them to be removed. County Executives did it anyways.
They have one. He just happened to not be on site.
https://wtop.com/montgomery-county/2026/02/1-shot-inside-wootton-high-school-in-rockville/
That's because it's not an SRO but a CEO. A CEO does not stay inside the school nor walk the halls unless invited by the Principal. A CEO is shared with the cluster.
Bring back SROs.
No, we don't need police in schools and they don't really stop shit like this from happening, anyway. See Uvalde or Parkland, for example.
Yes, we do. A good officer could shoot the shooter. There are plenty of situations where they do step in and resolve it. The two you are choosing are the worst but there are many times SRO's save lives. Some schools have an officer sitting outside a lot of time. Ours do.
All schools needs metal detectors. The school is huge. An officer cant cover the whole school. They would not have prevented a one off shooting targeting a specific individual. A police officer may be able to reduce the amount of people killed in a mass shooting but most times, they won’t be able to stop a shooting from happening in the first place.
Sign the petition
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1259637.page
The WUSA story said that the student had a ghost gun. Not an expert here, but wouldn't a metal detector be useless in that instance? (obviously it would prevent other firearms from getting through....just saying that I don't know if it would have made a difference here).
I personally think that re-instating the SRO program and focusing on prevention is the most critical need here.
Anonymous wrote:My HS drafted a community letter that is going out at some point today.
Anonymous wrote:Has MCPS sent out a statement about this yet? We're not close to the school but our parent community is still talking about it.
Anonymous wrote:Has MCPS sent out a statement about this yet? We're not close to the school but our parent community is still talking about it.
Anonymous wrote:Does anyone know if the school has shared resources for the kids and families for counseling services and mental health support?