Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:https://bsky.app/profile/jacksheriff.bsky.social/post/3lgwm6jkfv22f
I think that the less common approach to the diagonal runway (runway 33/4) might have played a part. The plane they hit would have been to their left, over Bolling AFB in Southwest DC. The plane further away, coming in for the main runway (runway 1/19, which runs north-south), would have been right over the river, probably straight ahead. They might have thought they were supposed to look out for that plane and not the closer one on their left.
The plane was landing towards the pentagon?
Yes, if you look at the airport it is the short runway pointing at the Pentagon. So to approach it, you swing further east than the more common approach up the river.
But it’s hard for me to imagine that could have been a factor. It’s not like they never use that runway.
Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t training exercises just mean “that’s all we will say and you will never know the truth?”
Anonymous wrote:Jesus. Maybe go train your pilots somewhere else?!?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Congress approved additional flights at DCA last year, over the protests of the locals. I hope they reduce the number now and enforce stricter regulations for all these helicopters.
Seems like an annual tradition that Congress approves more and more flights. Enough is enough. Time to cut back.
They need to build a new airport further away from the city, then shut DCA down. Reagan (like much in the area) was built in the 40s when there were far fewer people. DC has grown much too large to rely on such a small airport.
Keep the helicopters away from DCA. Pentagon officials can take cars.
+1
Far too many helicopters. Never clear where so many people are going.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Congress approved additional flights at DCA last year, over the protests of the locals. I hope they reduce the number now and enforce stricter regulations for all these helicopters.
Seems like an annual tradition that Congress approves more and more flights. Enough is enough. Time to cut back.
They need to build a new airport further away from the city, then shut DCA down. Reagan (like much in the area) was built in the 40s when there were far fewer people. DC has grown much too large to rely on such a small airport.
Dulles and BWI already exist as bigger airports further away from the city. DCA will never close. The House and Senate members depend on its convenience.
Anonymous wrote:Nobody has any idea right now if the volume of flights at DCA has anything to do with this crash, and indeed it seems unlikely.
It would make a lot more sense to jump to that conclusion if there had been a runway collision or something. There will be helicopters crossing the river no matter what.