Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Times has a disturbing article about how evangelical Christians in NC are still supporting Robinson and not even because they think the reporting is false. They just fine with him and his comments. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/23/us/politics/in-north-carolina-a-snapshot-of-mark-robinsons-enduring-support.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb&ngrp=mnp&pvid=297FA92D-3533-462B-BC07-475D74302B78

Did they read the really dirty stuff tho

Why would they?
They won’t hear about it from wherever they get their news and the pulpit will tell them the Christian thing to do, is own the libs.

For once CNN eliminating something bad from their reporting on a Republican was understandable. I’m really sorry I read that stuff about what he was doing with his wife’s sister.

Yeah— I got a broad overview from the press and am intentionally not reading it. Life is too short to spend it reading seriously perverted cr@p written by a candidate for governor from my home state. What’s out there is absolutely disqualifying. I trust the stuff they couldn’t even print is much worse. And can’t be unseen.

We had been thinking of retiring to Asheville in the next 2-3 years. This guy winning the R primary is reminding me why we left NC to raise kids— and making us rethinking moving back.

I lived in the Triangle for a few years after college and loved it. But the brutal, racist politics of former Gov Pat McCrory, his henchman Art Pope, etc and their roll back of 30 years of good, progressive politics extinguished any chance I would retire there.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I wonder what else is coming out about him.

Here you go, he and his wife were falsifying the criminal background checks of the employees of the daycare that they ran together. For the PP who implied he hadn’t committed any crimes, that’s another one.

“The report goes on to explain that Hill and Robinson somehow had the mandatory North Carolina Early Childhood Credential Certificates in their files despite the fact that DHHS “does not have record of having issued credentials.”

It also shows the pair were in possession of Criminal Records Qualifying letters even though North Carolina’s Criminal Records Unit “does not have record of having ever received criminal records forms nor issuing qualifying letters to you or your husband.”

The visit summary ends by informing Hill and Robinson that the administrative action against their license would proceed “as long as you are the owner of this facility,” and that it could come back to haunt them “in the event that you apply for a child care license in the future.”

https://notesfromthechalkboard.com/2024/07/09/nc-gubernatorial-candidate-mark-robinson-and-wife-were-cited-by-dhhs-for-falsifying-criminal-background-checks/
https://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/article289611232.html

This is like the George Santos slow moving train wreck. Everyday more bizarre, gross, criminal stuff comes out.

+1 The next logical thing should be what the hell was wrong with their backgrounds that they needed to falsify background checks to run a daycare. 😬😬😬

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I wonder what else is coming out about him.

Here you go, he and his wife were falsifying the criminal background checks of the employees of the daycare that they ran together. For the PP who implied he hadn’t committed any crimes, that’s another one.

“The report goes on to explain that Hill and Robinson somehow had the mandatory North Carolina Early Childhood Credential Certificates in their files despite the fact that DHHS “does not have record of having issued credentials.”

It also shows the pair were in possession of Criminal Records Qualifying letters even though North Carolina’s Criminal Records Unit “does not have record of having ever received criminal records forms nor issuing qualifying letters to you or your husband.”

The visit summary ends by informing Hill and Robinson that the administrative action against their license would proceed “as long as you are the owner of this facility,” and that it could come back to haunt them “in the event that you apply for a child care license in the future.”

https://notesfromthechalkboard.com/2024/07/09/nc-gubernatorial-candidate-mark-robinson-and-wife-were-cited-by-dhhs-for-falsifying-criminal-background-checks/
https://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/article289611232.html

This is like the George Santos slow moving train wreck. Everyday more bizarre, gross, criminal stuff comes out.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Times has a disturbing article about how evangelical Christians in NC are still supporting Robinson and not even because they think the reporting is false. They just fine with him and his comments. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/23/us/politics/in-north-carolina-a-snapshot-of-mark-robinsons-enduring-support.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb&ngrp=mnp&pvid=297FA92D-3533-462B-BC07-475D74302B78

Did they read the really dirty stuff tho

Why would they?
They won’t hear about it from wherever they get their news and the pulpit will tell them the Christian thing to do, is own the libs.

For once CNN eliminating something bad from their reporting on a Republican was understandable. I’m really sorry I read that stuff about what he was doing with his wife’s sister.

+1. I don’t think they could print it without violating public decency laws— and really upsetting people whose kids might be reading news articles.

Anonymous wrote:The Times has a disturbing article about how evangelical Christians in NC are still supporting Robinson and not even because they think the reporting is false. They just fine with him and his comments. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/23/us/politics/in-north-carolina-a-snapshot-of-mark-robinsons-enduring-support.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb&ngrp=mnp&pvid=297FA92D-3533-462B-BC07-475D74302B78

+1 PP who grew up in rural NC and has been looking at moving to Asheville. This is not shocking. At all. We moved to a new town for my first job, and our insurance agent, real estate agency and the attorney closing our home all asked us within 5 minutes of us being introduced where we would be attending church (insurance agent asked if we had “found our church home”). The churches controls social life in rural eras and become way too emmeshed in family stuff they should stay out of (counseling women who have been abused to give I one more chance and this time try not to piss him off, and other “Christian counseling” etc— this happened to my mother). And, of course they preach politics from the alter. I left because hypocrisy. I don’t think religion is valuable unless it gives you a moral framework you can actually follow. Attending church, but feeling morally bound to ignore some really screwed up church teachings and just take what you like defeats the purpose, IMO.

I’d say people are brainwashed, but I’m Gen X and a decent percentage of us have become agnostic or non-practicing. And that number is much higher among Gen Z. Southern churches are fighting so hard because they know there is an expiration date on their political power. My boomer parents have been brainwashed. But every generation, more people question their churches or leave altogether.

I will say the sad part is that this helps worsen Gen X, Millennial and Gen Z social isolation issues. There just isn’t much to do in rural NC, or the rural South. It’s not like you can go to nice dinners and plays or take interesting adult Ed classes, engage in fine arts on a regular basis, attended sports outside of the local HS football game, etc. without driving 2+ hours. The churches have a lot of social activities and create connections in these area. As people leave churches, there is a void. Not suggestion people should stay with these churches, but rural areas need something similar to fill the void for non religious people.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Times has a disturbing article about how evangelical Christians in NC are still supporting Robinson and not even because they think the reporting is false. They just fine with him and his comments. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/23/us/politics/in-north-carolina-a-snapshot-of-mark-robinsons-enduring-support.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb&ngrp=mnp&pvid=297FA92D-3533-462B-BC07-475D74302B78

Did they read the really dirty stuff tho

Why would they?
They won’t hear about it from wherever they get their news and the pulpit will tell them the Christian thing to do, is own the libs.

For once CNN eliminating something bad from their reporting on a Republican was understandable. I’m really sorry I read that stuff about what he was doing with his wife’s sister.

Yeah— I got a broad overview from the press and am intentionally not reading it. Life is too short to spend it reading seriously perverted cr@p written by a candidate for governor from my home state. What’s out there is absolutely disqualifying. I trust the stuff they couldn’t even print is much worse. And can’t be unseen.

We had been thinking of retiring to Asheville in the next 2-3 years. This guy winning the R primary is reminding me why we left NC to raise kids— and making us rethinking moving back.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So JD does not have an opinion about whether or not Robinson is guilty. He said the public needs to decide. 🙄🙄🙄

He is a scared, weak little b

Low T, Beta Cuck, etc.

Of course, when you have "salacious lies" about your on-line account usage, and you plan to sue a major media outlet like CNN, and you want to find the source of the erroneous content, you discourage tech experts who specialize in on-line triage and you hire a defense law firm that has defended Trump and others in his radius to research the source of the "lies".

Definitely does not sound at all like he is guilty and trying to cover up and smear the news organizations that blew his cover.

https://www.thedailybeast.com/mark-robinson-hires-longtime-trump-lawyer-to-investigate-cnn-report

In a press release on Tuesday, Robinson announced he was retaining the services of the Binnall Law Group, a Virginia-based firm founded by Jesse Binnall—a lawyer who has represented former President Donald Trump and others in his orbit.

[...]

Robinson said his lawyers would “investigate where and how these false smears originated. I am confident that Binnall Law Group will leave no stone unturned and enable us to use every legal means to hold CNN accountable for their lies.”

Local North Carolina station WRAL reported that Robinson rejected offers from supporters to connect him with tech specialists to investigate the posts—a move that potentially helped convince some staffers to abruptly leave his campaigns, sources told the station.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So JD does not have an opinion about whether or not Robinson is guilty. He said the public needs to decide. 🙄🙄🙄

Now that the Trump campaign has disavowed its support of Robinson, I imagine JD is allowed to have an opinion!

Link?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-withdraws-support-gop-pulls-funding-from-black-nazi-mark-robinson

Trump hasn’t said anything about Robinson.

Confirmed here that Trump has not “disavowed support” for Robinson.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So JD does not have an opinion about whether or not Robinson is guilty. He said the public needs to decide. 🙄🙄🙄

Now that the Trump campaign has disavowed its support of Robinson, I imagine JD is allowed to have an opinion!

Link?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-withdraws-support-gop-pulls-funding-from-black-nazi-mark-robinson

Trump hasn’t said anything about Robinson.

Maybe he doesn’t know, since his favorite Fox hosts haven’t mentioned it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

I wonder what else is coming out about him.

Here you go, he and his wife were falsifying the criminal background checks of the employees of the daycare that they ran together. For the PP who implied he hadn’t committed any crimes, that’s another one.

“The report goes on to explain that Hill and Robinson somehow had the mandatory North Carolina Early Childhood Credential Certificates in their files despite the fact that DHHS “does not have record of having issued credentials.”

It also shows the pair were in possession of Criminal Records Qualifying letters even though North Carolina’s Criminal Records Unit “does not have record of having ever received criminal records forms nor issuing qualifying letters to you or your husband.”

The visit summary ends by informing Hill and Robinson that the administrative action against their license would proceed “as long as you are the owner of this facility,” and that it could come back to haunt them “in the event that you apply for a child care license in the future.”

https://notesfromthechalkboard.com/2024/07/09/nc-gubernatorial-candidate-mark-robinson-and-wife-were-cited-by-dhhs-for-falsifying-criminal-background-checks/
https://www.newsobserver.com/opinion/article289611232.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

This. They don't care who is elected as long as their agenda is advanced.

What agenda? To own the libs?

No. To own state governments so they can gerrymander congressional districts, create permanent minority rule, stack courts with favorable judges, deligitimize opposition and end democracy as we have known it.

You know...what they've been doing successfully for 45 years.

THIS. How easily Dem supporters are distracted by meme politics.

Go smash a Keurig. It’s just that Democrats aren’t inclined to cheat like Republicans do.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So JD does not have an opinion about whether or not Robinson is guilty. He said the public needs to decide. 🙄🙄🙄

Now that the Trump campaign has disavowed its support of Robinson, I imagine JD is allowed to have an opinion!

Link?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/trump-withdraws-support-gop-pulls-funding-from-black-nazi-mark-robinson

Trump hasn’t said anything about Robinson.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The Times has a disturbing article about how evangelical Christians in NC are still supporting Robinson and not even because they think the reporting is false. They just fine with him and his comments. https://www.nytimes.com/2024/09/23/us/politics/in-north-carolina-a-snapshot-of-mark-robinsons-enduring-support.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare&sgrp=c-cb&ngrp=mnp&pvid=297FA92D-3533-462B-BC07-475D74302B78

Did they read the really dirty stuff tho

You need to understand the mindset of the evangelicals. They have been brainwashed to think Democrats are Satan. They can't take in real information as their brains have been corrupted. I'm not being snarky. Have you ever been to a mega church? You can't talk people out of a cult.