Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This year also marked the first time TJ has a student who failed SOL. Quite “a landmark achievement” for the equity team.
Failed what SOL? In what year- 9th?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is a “magnet” schools which was previously accepted as a top school when academics (courses, essay, gpa, testing, etc.) was the only criteria when now the criteria includes points for experiential factors having absolutely no bearing on academic ability? Anyone who says TJ is as good as always is blind to what everyone else sees.
Well, that's not exactly accurate. Previously the only criteria was whether you could buy the test answers. These days it's at least based on merit.
Merit? Please define experiential factors.
Still seems better than memorizing test answers purchased from a prep center.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is a “magnet” schools which was previously accepted as a top school when academics (courses, essay, gpa, testing, etc.) was the only criteria when now the criteria includes points for experiential factors having absolutely no bearing on academic ability? Anyone who says TJ is as good as always is blind to what everyone else sees.
Well, that's not exactly accurate. Previously the only criteria was whether you could buy the test answers. These days it's at least based on merit.
Merit? Please define experiential factors.
Still seems better than memorizing test answers purchased from a prep center.
which prep center is selling test answers? Name it!![]()
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is a “magnet” schools which was previously accepted as a top school when academics (courses, essay, gpa, testing, etc.) was the only criteria when now the criteria includes points for experiential factors having absolutely no bearing on academic ability? Anyone who says TJ is as good as always is blind to what everyone else sees.
Well, that's not exactly accurate. Previously the only criteria was whether you could buy the test answers. These days it's at least based on merit.
Merit? Please define experiential factors.
Still seems better than memorizing test answers purchased from a prep center.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is a “magnet” schools which was previously accepted as a top school when academics (courses, essay, gpa, testing, etc.) was the only criteria when now the criteria includes points for experiential factors having absolutely no bearing on academic ability? Anyone who says TJ is as good as always is blind to what everyone else sees.
Well, that's not exactly accurate. Previously the only criteria was whether you could buy the test answers. These days it's at least based on merit.
Merit? Please define experiential factors.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is a “magnet” schools which was previously accepted as a top school when academics (courses, essay, gpa, testing, etc.) was the only criteria when now the criteria includes points for experiential factors having absolutely no bearing on academic ability? Anyone who says TJ is as good as always is blind to what everyone else sees.
Well, that's not exactly accurate. Previously the only criteria was whether you could buy the test answers. These days it's at least based on merit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is a “magnet” schools which was previously accepted as a top school when academics (courses, essay, gpa, testing, etc.) was the only criteria when now the criteria includes points for experiential factors having absolutely no bearing on academic ability? Anyone who says TJ is as good as always is blind to what everyone else sees.
Bro you don’t have better things to worry about? None of your
Children go to tj anyway 🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is a “magnet” schools which was previously accepted as a top school when academics (courses, essay, gpa, testing, etc.) was the only criteria when now the criteria includes points for experiential factors having absolutely no bearing on academic ability? Anyone who says TJ is as good as always is blind to what everyone else sees.
Well, that's not exactly accurate. Previously the only criteria was whether you could buy the test answers. These days it's at least based on merit.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is a “magnet” schools which was previously accepted as a top school when academics (courses, essay, gpa, testing, etc.) was the only criteria when now the criteria includes points for experiential factors having absolutely no bearing on academic ability? Anyone who says TJ is as good as always is blind to what everyone else sees.
Well, that's not exactly accurate. Previously the only criteria was whether you could buy the test answers. These days it's at least based on merit.
Anonymous wrote:Why is a “magnet” schools which was previously accepted as a top school when academics (courses, essay, gpa, testing, etc.) was the only criteria when now the criteria includes points for experiential factors having absolutely no bearing on academic ability? Anyone who says TJ is as good as always is blind to what everyone else sees.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why is a “magnet” schools which was previously accepted as a top school when academics (courses, essay, gpa, testing, etc.) was the only criteria when now the criteria includes points for experiential factors having absolutely no bearing on academic ability? Anyone who says TJ is as good as always is blind to what everyone else sees.
Bro you don’t have better things to worry about? None of your
Children go to tj anyway 🤪🤪🤪🤪🤪
Anonymous wrote:Why is a “magnet” schools which was previously accepted as a top school when academics (courses, essay, gpa, testing, etc.) was the only criteria when now the criteria includes points for experiential factors having absolutely no bearing on academic ability? Anyone who says TJ is as good as always is blind to what everyone else sees.