Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would O.J. have cuts on his hand without cuts on the glove?

The glove looked pristine and brand new not like it went through double murder. The bloody leather glove was as shiny as a Michael Jackson’s and so obviously planted by Furhman. It was not in ruins consistent with the amount of blood found on it or OJ’s cuts or Ron’s defensive wounds.

Ego is a terrible thing. People don’t want to admit the prosecution’s evidence made no sense

It made perfect sense. The prosecution had a great case, but oj’s lawyers we’re better, the jury believed the case would be about helping out a black man that was charming, etc.
You really can’t be this delusional. It’s not an opinion, it’s a fact- Oj killed them. His own agent and Oj’s lawyers knew it too, but you can live in fantasy land if you want too

It’s not a fact OJ killed them. The smoking gun is the blood and OJ’s blood went missing from a lab . We aren’t sure that wasn’t planted because the lead detective has a history of planting evidence on black men .

Here’s a 1995 article about the missing blood. The prison nurse had to lie and say he only withdrew 6.7 mm of blood when he later said he was sure his initial testimony that it was 8 mm was correct because he withdrew that amount his entire career and it is an even number

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/06/us/witness-tries-to-explain-missing-simpson-blood.html

Have you researched any of this case at all. Oj was in Chicago so getting his blood to plant was an impossibility. They had no way of getting his blood because he wasn’t in town.
I loved the naked gun movies, too but he murdered two people. Go listen to the Oj interrogation, interviews he did(Chris Myers interview was riveting)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would O.J. have cuts on his hand without cuts on the glove?

The glove looked pristine and brand new not like it went through double murder. The bloody leather glove was as shiny as a Michael Jackson’s and so obviously planted by Furhman. It was not in ruins consistent with the amount of blood found on it or OJ’s cuts or Ron’s defensive wounds.

Ego is a terrible thing. People don’t want to admit the prosecution’s evidence made no sense

It made perfect sense. The prosecution had a great case, but oj’s lawyers we’re better, the jury believed the case would be about helping out a black man that was charming, etc.
You really can’t be this delusional. It’s not an opinion, it’s a fact- Oj killed them. His own agent and Oj’s lawyers knew it too, but you can live in fantasy land if you want too

It’s not a fact OJ killed them. The smoking gun is the blood and OJ’s blood went missing from a lab . We aren’t sure that wasn’t planted because the lead detective has a history of planting evidence on black men .

Here’s a 1995 article about the missing blood. The prison nurse had to lie and say he only withdrew 6.7 mm of blood when he later said he was sure his initial testimony that it was 8 mm was correct because he withdrew that amount his entire career and it is an even number

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/06/us/witness-tries-to-explain-missing-simpson-blood.html

Have you researched any of this case at all. Oj was in Chicago so getting his blood to plant was an impossibility. They had no way of getting his blood because he wasn’t in town.
I loved the naked gun movies, too but he murdered two people. Go listen to the Oj interrogation, interviews he did(Chris Myers interview was riveting)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mark Furhman was known for planting drugs on African American men. The blood evidence in the case could All be planted which is why OJ wasn’t found guilty . Only an idiot would wear gloves to not leave a trace and then leave the bloody glove at the scene in a panic . That defeats the purpose . Such a scene would only happen if it were an unintended crime of passion but why bring gloves in LA in June ?

These facts and more are why the case fell apart

OJ was found not guilty because there were enough jury members who were glad he killed her.

They have said this out loud on camera, there is no reason to pretend it's not true.

It is well documented that Cochran's pre-jury selection research demonstrated he could find jurors like that.

Link? Any person making such an inflammatory statement about a victim would be disqualified from the jury .

If the jurors were all white, I still believe OJ would have walked ala Michael
Jackson in Santa Barbara. Furhman messed up things and his defense was too good. I know people hate Cochran , Kardashian, and Dershowitz and say their cancers were karma but they were darn good

You’re asking for a link to the six-hour documentary and post-trial memoirs of the lawyers? Cochran had to be persuaded to adopt his eventual jury-selection strategy. (He wanted one gender and was convinced by the consultants why the other was better).

No, I am asking for the link to jurors saying they’re glad Nicole was dead. There’s lots of projection going on here.

I still think if the jury was all white, OJ would’ve been found innocent. The prosecution and detective /LAPD did a horrible job

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would O.J. have cuts on his hand without cuts on the glove?

The glove looked pristine and brand new not like it went through double murder. The bloody leather glove was as shiny as a Michael Jackson’s and so obviously planted by Furhman. It was not in ruins consistent with the amount of blood found on it or OJ’s cuts or Ron’s defensive wounds.

Ego is a terrible thing. People don’t want to admit the prosecution’s evidence made no sense

It made perfect sense. The prosecution had a great case, but oj’s lawyers we’re better, the jury believed the case would be about helping out a black man that was charming, etc.
You really can’t be this delusional. It’s not an opinion, it’s a fact- Oj killed them. His own agent and Oj’s lawyers knew it too, but you can live in fantasy land if you want too

It’s not a fact OJ killed them. The smoking gun is the blood and OJ’s blood went missing from a lab . We aren’t sure that wasn’t planted because the lead detective has a history of planting evidence on black men .

Here’s a 1995 article about the missing blood. The prison nurse had to lie and say he only withdrew 6.7 mm of blood when he later said he was sure his initial testimony that it was 8 mm was correct because he withdrew that amount his entire career and it is an even number

https://www.nytimes.com/1995/05/06/us/witness-tries-to-explain-missing-simpson-blood.html

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mark Furhman was known for planting drugs on African American men. The blood evidence in the case could All be planted which is why OJ wasn’t found guilty . Only an idiot would wear gloves to not leave a trace and then leave the bloody glove at the scene in a panic . That defeats the purpose . Such a scene would only happen if it were an unintended crime of passion but why bring gloves in LA in June ?

These facts and more are why the case fell apart

OJ was found not guilty because there were enough jury members who were glad he killed her.

They have said this out loud on camera, there is no reason to pretend it's not true.

It is well documented that Cochran's pre-jury selection research demonstrated he could find jurors like that.

Link? Any person making such an inflammatory statement about a victim would be disqualified from the jury .

If the jurors were all white, I still believe OJ would have walked ala Michael
Jackson in Santa Barbara. Furhman messed up things and his defense was too good. I know people hate Cochran , Kardashian, and Dershowitz and say their cancers were karma but they were darn good

You’re asking for a link to the six-hour documentary and post-trial memoirs of the lawyers? Cochran had to be persuaded to adopt his eventual jury-selection strategy. (He wanted one gender and was convinced by the consultants why the other was better).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:How would O.J. have cuts on his hand without cuts on the glove?

The glove looked pristine and brand new not like it went through double murder. The bloody leather glove was as shiny as a Michael Jackson’s and so obviously planted by Furhman. It was not in ruins consistent with the amount of blood found on it or OJ’s cuts or Ron’s defensive wounds.

Ego is a terrible thing. People don’t want to admit the prosecution’s evidence made no sense

It made perfect sense. The prosecution had a great case, but oj’s lawyers we’re better, the jury believed the case would be about helping out a black man that was charming, etc.
You really can’t be this delusional. It’s not an opinion, it’s a fact- Oj killed them. His own agent and Oj’s lawyers knew it too, but you can live in fantasy land if you want too

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mark Furhman was known for planting drugs on African American men. The blood evidence in the case could All be planted which is why OJ wasn’t found guilty . Only an idiot would wear gloves to not leave a trace and then leave the bloody glove at the scene in a panic . That defeats the purpose . Such a scene would only happen if it were an unintended crime of passion but why bring gloves in LA in June ?

These facts and more are why the case fell apart

The bloodstained evidence (the socks in the bedroom, the blood in the Bronco, OJs blood on the scene to the left of the Bruno Magli footprints (OJ was cut on his left hand which the police didn’t know at that point), the glove on his property) was all recovered/documented/photographed before OJ returned to LA from Chicago. They didn’t have OJs blood to plant at that point.

Thank you. This is the most important point of all. They couldn’t plant his blood because he was out of town and they didn’t have it. You shut down her argument in one paragraph. Thank you

As for the cut on his hand--how did he cut his non-dominant hand throwing a glass? The effort to reconstruct throwing the glass showed it would have taken considerable effort to shatter not just one throw, even a hard one, into a sink. Why was there no blood on the glass pieces or in the sink? You know how you can injure your finger to the point where it was extremely swollen in addition to bleeding? By beating two victims with unmitigated ferocity, using both hands, when they were attempting to fight back. EVEN if you're wearing gloves.

Talking to anyone thinking Oj is innocent would be like trying to talk to someone at a trump rally. It’s impossible to penetrate conspiracy- fantasy land

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mark Furhman was known for planting drugs on African American men. The blood evidence in the case could All be planted which is why OJ wasn’t found guilty . Only an idiot would wear gloves to not leave a trace and then leave the bloody glove at the scene in a panic . That defeats the purpose . Such a scene would only happen if it were an unintended crime of passion but why bring gloves in LA in June ?

These facts and more are why the case fell apart

The bloodstained evidence (the socks in the bedroom, the blood in the Bronco, OJs blood on the scene to the left of the Bruno Magli footprints (OJ was cut on his left hand which the police didn’t know at that point), the glove on his property) was all recovered/documented/photographed before OJ returned to LA from Chicago. They didn’t have OJs blood to plant at that point.

Thank you. This is the most important point of all. They couldn’t plant his blood because he was out of town and they didn’t have it. You shut down her argument in one paragraph. Thank you

As for the cut on his hand--how did he cut his non-dominant hand throwing a glass? The effort to reconstruct throwing the glass showed it would have taken considerable effort to shatter not just one throw, even a hard one, into a sink. Why was there no blood on the glass pieces or in the sink? You know how you can injure your finger to the point where it was extremely swollen in addition to bleeding? By beating two victims with unmitigated ferocity, using both hands, when they were attempting to fight back. EVEN if you're wearing gloves.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A comment I've read on a few forums is that it's "karma" now that OJ has died. It would have been "karma" if he had died right after the criminal trail, or if he had died a horrible and painful death. But the fact that after the trial, he lived for another 29 years, had pensions that reportedly paid him between 100k to 300k annually and lived to 76, means that after the trial (apart from the prison sentence) he lived a life better than many others.

Do you know anything about abused women? They will lie for them because they fear them.
Talking to anyone that thinks Oj is innocent would be like trying to talk to someone at a trump rally. It’s impossible to penetrate conspiracy- fantasy land
He lived in infamy for those years. He liked being famous and beloved.

A majority of the time, people are abused and killed by people who know them. He was that person.

They had a classical batterer/victim relationship. He beat her many times. Most of this was not brought up at trial. In the OJ film, it said she had written about 60 beatings in her diary. She also broke up with him about a month before the murder. A breakup is the most dangerous time for the woman. This is when an abuser will kill the victim. He had the classic personality of an abuser too: charming, affable to outsiders. People associate that with his celebrity, but he would have probably been charming even if he had not been famous.

He got away with a ton. Even the way the police handled it at the beginning and how they handled her calls before the murder. He got special treatment.

I do see how the Black community supported him. The LAPD was racist, used battering rams to destroy houses during the war on drugs, and this happened soon after Rodney King and those police officers being cleared. Also, he had some brilliant and charismatic lawyers--namely, Johnny Cochran and Barry Scheck.

Nicole’s diaries are questionable . She was also encouraged by her divorce lawyers to exaggerate or falsify domestic abuse claims to get more spousal support from OJ. Kris Jenner tried but failed to do the same thing to Robert Kardashian , an attorney who knew better and left Kris Jenner practically penniless in the divorce so she had to marry Caitlyn

Okay? The police came out several times. An officer testified she came out in a bra and sweatpants, they arrested him, he pled no contest and did community service by hosting a golf tournament. She had photos of herself beaten up. I guess that meant she wasn't in danger?

plus 1. How delusional and whacky Pp is for suggesting exaggeration. Photos don’t exaggerate. Her face was beaten in those photos but she exaggerated….. um ok. We have people on this thread with their heads in the sand

Did she go to the hospital ? I can take pictures right now and write diary entries about getting beaten up. Answering the cops with a bra out is not what a terrified woman would do if she were just beaten half to death by her husband . Nicole wanted money and didn’t want to get a job . She did what her friends advised her to do but it failed ,so she decided to reunite with OJ instead in 1993 and agree to ditch her bad friends and lifestyle . Her parents wanted her to go to rehab .

There’s so much there that could be said about how the case was botched,
How Nicole was awful to their house staff, and how Nicole’s friendship with Faye Resnick and Ron Goldman were highly dangerous given their shady pals.
The book Raging Heart by Sheila Weller talks more about Nicole and Ojs marriage and why they were toxic for each other

This is why you could see video of her getting killed and still side with Oj. She had pictures of her beat up face with diary so no, she wasn’t making it up.
Let me guess, you think she applied makeup to look beat up? You can’t be real

After one beating she did go to the hospital because he broke her arm. She lied and said she fell off her bike.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mark Furhman was known for planting drugs on African American men. The blood evidence in the case could All be planted which is why OJ wasn’t found guilty . Only an idiot would wear gloves to not leave a trace and then leave the bloody glove at the scene in a panic . That defeats the purpose . Such a scene would only happen if it were an unintended crime of passion but why bring gloves in LA in June ?

These facts and more are why the case fell apart

OJ was found not guilty because there were enough jury members who were glad he killed her.

They have said this out loud on camera, there is no reason to pretend it's not true.

It is well documented that Cochran's pre-jury selection research demonstrated he could find jurors like that.

Link? Any person making such an inflammatory statement about a victim would be disqualified from the jury .

If the jurors were all white, I still believe OJ would have walked ala Michael
Jackson in Santa Barbara. Furhman messed up things and his defense was too good. I know people hate Cochran , Kardashian, and Dershowitz and say their cancers were karma but they were darn good

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Mark Furhman was known for planting drugs on African American men. The blood evidence in the case could All be planted which is why OJ wasn’t found guilty . Only an idiot would wear gloves to not leave a trace and then leave the bloody glove at the scene in a panic . That defeats the purpose . Such a scene would only happen if it were an unintended crime of passion but why bring gloves in LA in June ?

These facts and more are why the case fell apart

The bloodstained evidence (the socks in the bedroom, the blood in the Bronco, OJs blood on the scene to the left of the Bruno Magli footprints (OJ was cut on his left hand which the police didn’t know at that point), the glove on his property) was all recovered/documented/photographed before OJ returned to LA from Chicago. They didn’t have OJs blood to plant at that point.

Thank you. This is the most important point of all. They couldn’t plant his blood because he was out of town and they didn’t have it. You shut down her argument in one paragraph. Thank you

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:A comment I've read on a few forums is that it's "karma" now that OJ has died. It would have been "karma" if he had died right after the criminal trail, or if he had died a horrible and painful death. But the fact that after the trial, he lived for another 29 years, had pensions that reportedly paid him between 100k to 300k annually and lived to 76, means that after the trial (apart from the prison sentence) he lived a life better than many others.

He lived in infamy for those years. He liked being famous and beloved.

A majority of the time, people are abused and killed by people who know them. He was that person.

They had a classical batterer/victim relationship. He beat her many times. Most of this was not brought up at trial. In the OJ film, it said she had written about 60 beatings in her diary. She also broke up with him about a month before the murder. A breakup is the most dangerous time for the woman. This is when an abuser will kill the victim. He had the classic personality of an abuser too: charming, affable to outsiders. People associate that with his celebrity, but he would have probably been charming even if he had not been famous.

He got away with a ton. Even the way the police handled it at the beginning and how they handled her calls before the murder. He got special treatment.

I do see how the Black community supported him. The LAPD was racist, used battering rams to destroy houses during the war on drugs, and this happened soon after Rodney King and those police officers being cleared. Also, he had some brilliant and charismatic lawyers--namely, Johnny Cochran and Barry Scheck.

Nicole’s diaries are questionable . She was also encouraged by her divorce lawyers to exaggerate or falsify domestic abuse claims to get more spousal support from OJ. Kris Jenner tried but failed to do the same thing to Robert Kardashian , an attorney who knew better and left Kris Jenner practically penniless in the divorce so she had to marry Caitlyn

Okay? The police came out several times. An officer testified she came out in a bra and sweatpants, they arrested him, he pled no contest and did community service by hosting a golf tournament. She had photos of herself beaten up. I guess that meant she wasn't in danger?

plus 1. How delusional and whacky Pp is for suggesting exaggeration. Photos don’t exaggerate. Her face was beaten in those photos but she exaggerated….. um ok. We have people on this thread with their heads in the sand

Did she go to the hospital ? I can take pictures right now and write diary entries about getting beaten up. Answering the cops with a bra out is not what a terrified woman would do if she were just beaten half to death by her husband . Nicole wanted money and didn’t want to get a job . She did what her friends advised her to do but it failed ,so she decided to reunite with OJ instead in 1993 and agree to ditch her bad friends and lifestyle . Her parents wanted her to go to rehab .

There’s so much there that could be said about how the case was botched,
How Nicole was awful to their house staff, and how Nicole’s friendship with Faye Resnick and Ron Goldman were highly dangerous given their shady pals.
The book Raging Heart by Sheila Weller talks more about Nicole and Ojs marriage and why they were toxic for each other

This is why you could see video of her getting killed and still side with Oj. She had pictures of her beat up face with diary so no, she wasn’t making it up.
Let me guess, you think she applied makeup to look beat up? You can’t be real