Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know, it's bizarre to me that the religious extremists who want to argue that a fertilized egg is a baby, because GOD, don't have a problem with that god letting more than half of those babies die before ever seeing the light of day. Clearly these people know nothing about the inefficiency of human reproduction. The ratio of fertilized eggs to babies born into the world is completely lopsided, because it takes so many fertilized eggs to get one that is in good enough shape and a womb that is not hostile to it in order to gestate a fetus that is healthy enough to gestate into a baby.
If those eggs are really babies created by God, why is God letting so many of them die?
You really have to wonder about the basic human reproduction education level of some GOP voters. I mean they did understand the overturning roe would lead to way more than just abortion bans. No more IVF, no more birth control, erosion of quality maternal healthcare systems, women not wanting to risk pregnancy and birth...or even sex probably, declining birth rates..etc. etc.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know, it's bizarre to me that the religious extremists who want to argue that a fertilized egg is a baby, because GOD, don't have a problem with that god letting more than half of those babies die before ever seeing the light of day. Clearly these people know nothing about the inefficiency of human reproduction. The ratio of fertilized eggs to babies born into the world is completely lopsided, because it takes so many fertilized eggs to get one that is in good enough shape and a womb that is not hostile to it in order to gestate a fetus that is healthy enough to gestate into a baby.
If those eggs are really babies created by God, why is God letting so many of them die?
You really have to wonder about the basic human reproduction education level of some GOP voters. I mean they did understand the overturning roe would lead to way more than just abortion bans. No more IVF, no more birth control, erosion of quality maternal healthcare systems, women not wanting to risk pregnancy and birth...or even sex probably, declining birth rates..etc. etc.
Anonymous wrote:You know, it's bizarre to me that the religious extremists who want to argue that a fertilized egg is a baby, because GOD, don't have a problem with that god letting more than half of those babies die before ever seeing the light of day. Clearly these people know nothing about the inefficiency of human reproduction. The ratio of fertilized eggs to babies born into the world is completely lopsided, because it takes so many fertilized eggs to get one that is in good enough shape and a womb that is not hostile to it in order to gestate a fetus that is healthy enough to gestate into a baby.
If those eggs are really babies created by God, why is God letting so many of them die?
Anonymous wrote:And that's the problem: not all embryos implant even if they are transferred. Women also have natural miscarriages on top of potential non implanting.
If embryos are "people" then most women utilizing IFV to get pregnant may be considered "people" murderers by the GOP.
Anonymous wrote:You know, it's bizarre to me that the religious extremists who want to argue that a fertilized egg is a baby, because GOD, don't have a problem with that god letting more than half of those babies die before ever seeing the light of day. Clearly these people know nothing about the inefficiency of human reproduction. The ratio of fertilized eggs to babies born into the world is completely lopsided, because it takes so many fertilized eggs to get one that is in good enough shape and a womb that is not hostile to it in order to gestate a fetus that is healthy enough to gestate into a baby.
If those eggs are really babies created by God, why is God letting so many of them die?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is hysterical to me that a party that is mostly full of men is putting in policies that will make women not want to have sex with you in case they get pregnant.
To R men, you'd better be ready to whip out those condoms if you want to have recreational sex.
They’ll find ways to skirt these rules. Republicans are all about laws for thee, not for me.
Anonymous wrote:It is hysterical to me that a party that is mostly full of men is putting in policies that will make women not want to have sex with you in case they get pregnant.
To R men, you'd better be ready to whip out those condoms if you want to have recreational sex.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Where is the GOP going with this race to the bottom of the barrel?
Out of power.
Anonymous wrote:Where is the GOP going with this race to the bottom of the barrel?