Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Texas Supreme Court decision here:
https://www.txcourts.gov/media/1457645/230994pc.pdf
I love this part of the decision:
"These laws reflect the policy choice that the Legislature has made, and the courts must respect that choice. Part of the Legislature’s
choice is to permit a significant exception to the general prohibition against abortion. And it has delegated to the medical—rather than the legal—profession the decision about when a woman’s medical circumstances warrant this exception."
And then it goes on -- this body of white men who have no medical training at all -- to make a medical decision that supplants the decision of the patient's very own doctor.
Bunch of crooked, cruel, hateful, and barbaric idiots. Sorry, that phrasing is too kind to them.
Anonymous wrote:Texas Supreme Court decision here:
https://www.txcourts.gov/media/1457645/230994pc.pdf
Anonymous wrote:So they ruled there was insufficient evidence that her medical situation met the TX exception list, that if was possible she could meet it in the future.
So how will they rule in the Amanda Zurowski case? She did, eventually meet medical necessity, but suffered injury and nearly died because because she was forced to wait.
All eyes on this case moving forward.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65935189
Anti-abortion advocates and politicians who support the ban say that the Texas laws were always written clearly, but the new legislation will help make it more explicit.
"If a doctor can foresee that a woman has sepsis that could end up being life-threatening, they can act immediately," said Rebecca Parma, who leads anti-abortion research and advocacy for Texas Right to Life.
She also said that now that abortion has been banned, her group intends to advocate for increased social services to women and the extension of Medicaid, or free health insurance, up to a year after childbirth, to ensure that women's maternal health is not neglected.
Anonymous wrote:So they ruled there was insufficient evidence that her medical situation met the TX exception list, that if was possible she could meet it in the future.
So how will they rule in the Amanda Zurowski case? She did, eventually meet medical necessity, but suffered injury and nearly died because because she was forced to wait.
All eyes on this case moving forward.
https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-65935189
Anonymous wrote:
Every day I don't think I could become angrier. I'm channeling that into donating monthly to the Texas Democratic Party on top of the voter registration efforts that I'm already involved in in Ohio. This fills me with pure, unadulterated rage.
Anonymous wrote:Great! Did anyone know the process that I can sue her?... Could use a little extra Christmas spending cash this year
Anonymous wrote:Texas Supreme Court decision here:
https://www.txcourts.gov/media/1457645/230994pc.pdf
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's really time to get clinics and hospitals on Native American land and in the floating hospitals out at sea. It could help with some of the gaps in services in some of the southern states. (I did see an article on this when Roe was overturned. I'm surprised it isn't happening yet).
While I like this idea (military bases was also floated) we should NOT be creating workarounds for Republican toxic policies. The ONLY response to this is to crush MAGA/Christofascists. Until they are out of power they will just keep finding more horrible ways to hurt people.
It's more than abortion. It's them asserting their dominance over the rest of us. That is fascism, plain and simple. The sooner people understand and accept this, the sooner we call all work together, from Left to Right and Center, to vote to oust MAGA.
Anonymous wrote:It's really time to get clinics and hospitals on Native American land and in the floating hospitals out at sea. It could help with some of the gaps in services in some of the southern states. (I did see an article on this when Roe was overturned. I'm surprised it isn't happening yet).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Texas Supreme Court decision here:
https://www.txcourts.gov/media/1457645/230994pc.pdf
The finding itself is self-contradictory. Says a doctor shouldn't need to consult a court for permission to perform an abortion they deem medically necessary in their judgement while simultaneously denying an abortion the doctor deemed medically necessary.
Anonymous wrote:Texas Supreme Court decision here:
https://www.txcourts.gov/media/1457645/230994pc.pdf