Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is horrifying to think of a child who strangled a teacher at 5 and shot a teacher at 6 and what may lie in his future.
Other tiny children should never have been in the vicinity of someone so dangerous and their safety and that of the teacher(s) and staff should have been a paramount consideration.
This is the problem.....children and teachers are not even a thought.
+1 What about the right of those children to a free and appropriate education (FAPE)?
You don’t want to hear this, but the rights of a student with a disability will always preclude the rights of students without.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is horrifying to think of a child who strangled a teacher at 5 and shot a teacher at 6 and what may lie in his future.
Other tiny children should never have been in the vicinity of someone so dangerous and their safety and that of the teacher(s) and staff should have been a paramount consideration.
This is the problem.....children and teachers are not even a thought.
+1 What about the right of those children to a free and appropriate education (FAPE)?
You don’t want to hear this, but the rights of a student with a disability will always preclude the rights of students without.
PP here. I've worked in the special education field for over 30 years, and I advocate for childrrn with special needs every day. As educators, we are doing something wrong when children this volatile are sitting in mainstreamed classes due to our decisions.
I agree with you. Rarely is it the decision of the teachers though. It comes down to admin and parents being willing to hear our feedback and consider the best placement. The concept of LRE gets seriously abused by stakeholders who want full inclusion at any and all cost.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is horrifying to think of a child who strangled a teacher at 5 and shot a teacher at 6 and what may lie in his future.
Other tiny children should never have been in the vicinity of someone so dangerous and their safety and that of the teacher(s) and staff should have been a paramount consideration.
This is the problem.....children and teachers are not even a thought.
+1 What about the right of those children to a free and appropriate education (FAPE)?
You don’t want to hear this, but the rights of a student with a disability will always preclude the rights of students without.
PP here. I've worked in the special education field for over 30 years, and I advocate for childrrn with special needs every day. As educators, we are doing something wrong when children this volatile are sitting in mainstreamed classes due to our decisions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is horrifying to think of a child who strangled a teacher at 5 and shot a teacher at 6 and what may lie in his future.
Other tiny children should never have been in the vicinity of someone so dangerous and their safety and that of the teacher(s) and staff should have been a paramount consideration.
This is the problem.....children and teachers are not even a thought.
+1 What about the right of those children to a free and appropriate education (FAPE)?
You don’t want to hear this, but the rights of a student with a disability will always preclude the rights of students without.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is horrifying to think of a child who strangled a teacher at 5 and shot a teacher at 6 and what may lie in his future.
Other tiny children should never have been in the vicinity of someone so dangerous and their safety and that of the teacher(s) and staff should have been a paramount consideration.
This is the problem.....children and teachers are not even a thought.
+1 What about the right of those children to a free and appropriate education (FAPE)?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The law already is a free appropriate education. It’s called FAPE. free and appropriate education.
Yeah, well it is being abused and most people are aware of that. Kids who are a danger to other kids or themselves should not be in a mainstream class. It is not appropriate for themselves or for the other kids. And it should not require a year long process to move a kid who is causing classrooms to be evacuated on a regular basis.
I am sorry. I want all kids to be educated but there needs to be a better balance found between the extreme needs of kids whose behaviors are a danger to other kids. And the defense of kids whose are consistently leading to classrooms being evacuated is not helping the cause of kids who can be in a mainstream environment with some extra support. This is not an all or nothing.
hisAnonymous wrote:One of my former students was very out of control. She had tried to cut other students with scissors, hit/punch/kick whatever adult tried to stop her from eloping or hurting other people, etc. Her mother refused mental health services because she was "fine at home." Long story short, there isn't a lot that can be done without parental consent. I felt so bad for this child who was struggling so much. She transferred and I still wonder how she is. We need a lot more mental health counseling and sometimes students just need to be removed for everyone's safety even if the parent doesn't agree.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is horrifying to think of a child who strangled a teacher at 5 and shot a teacher at 6 and what may lie in his future.
Other tiny children should never have been in the vicinity of someone so dangerous and their safety and that of the teacher(s) and staff should have been a paramount consideration.
This is the problem.....children and teachers are not even a thought.
Anonymous wrote:It is horrifying to think of a child who strangled a teacher at 5 and shot a teacher at 6 and what may lie in his future.
Other tiny children should never have been in the vicinity of someone so dangerous and their safety and that of the teacher(s) and staff should have been a paramount consideration.
Anonymous wrote:The law already is a free appropriate education. It’s called FAPE. free and appropriate education.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Jesus. What do you do with a child like this? Is this nature? Is the child doomed to be a psychopath? Did the parents cause this? Why haven’t the parents’ identity been released? Shouldn’t they be charged like the parents of the Michigan shooter? I get the shooter is a minor, but I don’t like that the parents aren’t facing consequences for allowing their psycho kid to access a gun.
What can we as parents do to keep these dangerous kids away from our own children. If this continues then those who can afford it will leave for private schools since privates can choose who to admit.
As a society we don't want to admit that some people are born bad eggs. Maybe they'll wait until they're in their teens or young adulthood before they do something dangerous, or maybe if the conditions are ripe they'll harm others much earlier, like this kid.
We want to think that every child is special and can be saved, but it's a false premise. I don't know what the answer is, but we need some kind of universal testing and plan for kids who don't meet the requirements to safely interact with others.