Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does Charles' children have to call him something different now? Treat him differently? (I mean in private)

They called the Queen Granny so I don't see why it would be different with their father. They will have to bow/curtsey they first time they see him each day. So will his siblings.

Gan-Gan not Granny

So just to clear this one up, the Queen's grandchildren, William, Harry, Beatrice, etc called her "Granny"
and her great grandchildren, George, Charlotte, Louis etc called her "Gan Gan"

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Her hand with the bruise - blood thinners.

I think her getting COVID was the beginning of the end.

Dude, she was 96.

Anonymous wrote:Don’t be gross. I’m sure Charles is devastated and he’ll probably be a perfectly fine king.
The only royal I can hate on is Andrew and I’m sure even he is in pain right now.

Devastated is such a strong word. She was 96.

Wonder who wrote this. Certainly not TFG:
Melania and I are deeply saddened to learn of the loss of Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II. Together with our family and fellow Americans, we send our sincere condolences to the Royal Family and the people of the United Kingdom during this time of great sorrow and grief. Queen Elizabeth's historic and remarkable reign left a tremendous legacy of peace and prosperity for Great Britain. Her leadership and enduring diplomacy secured and advanced alliances with the United States and countries around the world. However, she will always be remembered for her faithfulness to her country and her unwavering devotion to her fellow countrymen and women. Melania and I will always cherish our time together with the Queen, and never forget Her Majesty's generous friendship, great wisdom, and wonderful sense of humor. What a grand and beautiful lady she was—there was nobody like her! Our thoughts and prayers will remain with the great people of the United Kingdom as you honor her most meaningful life and exceptional service to the people. May God bless the Queen, may she reign forever in our hearts, and may God hold her and Prince Philip in abiding care.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:They probably could not wait for Harry's arrival to announce her death. She's probably passed in the early afternoon. Harry and wife are probably always late and since they have exited royalty, they get to where they are on their own.

They announce the death after it happens. They do not wait for people to show up. Did they wait for Elizabeth?

Yes, there is a lag between death and announcement. There is a lot of work to do before an announcement can move forward (ie. update webpages with new titles, photos, draft announcements, gather family members, prepare protocols, confirm name for new regus, etc.). No wonder it took them 6 hrs between her likely death and the official announcement.

Anonymous wrote:Don’t be gross. I’m sure Charles is devastated and he’ll probably be a perfectly fine king.
The only royal I can hate on is Andrew and I’m sure even he is in pain right now.

He and his “wife” made Diane’s life miserable and Andrew Parker Bowles as well as all their children. They are two selfish people. They don’t deserve any respect.

There won’t be 70 years for Charles to reign, his reign per his age will be much shorter.

Don’t be gross. I’m sure Charles is devastated and he’ll probably be a perfectly fine king.
The only royal I can hate on is Andrew and I’m sure even he is in pain right now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The thing about King Charles is that he wears his emotions like a human, unlike other royal robots. He may be a fresh change.

Doubtful he will be a good King. The speech he gave for his mom’s 70th was horribly delivered. Clear he was reading it with no emotion and delivery was horrid.

I am glad the William should be king comments may now be over. After 20 years of it.

No way was Charles ever giving up the throne. He’s been salivating all his life for this!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The thing about King Charles is that he wears his emotions like a human, unlike other royal robots. He may be a fresh change.

Doubtful he will be a good King. The speech he gave for his mom’s 70th was horribly delivered. Clear he was reading it with no emotion and delivery was horrid.

I am glad the William should be king comments may now be over. After 20 years of it.

Anonymous wrote:Andrew was stripped of his "royalness"

Charles can work with certain govt agencies to forget about his brotherly problem.
Andrew’s mother would never.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Does Charles' children have to call him something different now? Treat him differently? (I mean in private)

They called the Queen Granny so I don't see why it would be different with their father. They will have to bow/curtsey they first time they see him each day. So will his siblings.

Gan-Gan not Granny

The is is such sad news. What an icon.

Anonymous wrote:The thing about King Charles is that he wears his emotions like a human, unlike other royal robots. He may be a fresh change.

Doubtful he will be a good King. The speech he gave for his mom’s 70th was horribly delivered. Clear he was reading it with no emotion and delivery was horrid.

Andrew was stripped of his "royalness"