Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
.For the people who worry that their kids need certain credentials to get into a good college, and need that good college to have a successful life, add me to the chorus of anecdotal evidence that says that’s simply not true. DH and I both went to state schools — me for financial reasons, him because he’s never been particularly ambitious — and we both got into top 10 law schools from there. Once you were in, which college you went to basically never mattered again. We’ve told our middle schooler that we know she’ll get into college *somewhere* no matter what, and it doesn’t have to be a particular ranking or a particular school unless she chooses to set her sights on that. I’m already glad we made that choice, it’s so much pressure off everyone’s shoulders for the years to come
Things are far more competitive now to go to your local state school, and certainly to get into a top 10 law school. And I'm sure that to get into that top ten law school, both you and your spouse had to be top students at your state school. Rankings and hard work and focus and drive still matter--you're deluding yourself if you think otherwise, and misleading your kids..
-- law school professor
OP here. Right?!! That PP makes me so mad. Saying shit like “we’re above it all, the college admissions rat race doesn’t apply to us, DC can go to Podunk State U and still end up at HYSCCN for law school” makes me angry. First, you’re just kicking the can down the road — work ethic, academic excellence, discipline, and prestige still matter to you, but for law school. And then there’s the factor that getting into Big Law out of law school has become infinitely more competitive — so your kids will still be subject to a rat race that’s infinitely more competitive than the one you went through.
Why would you be mad? Wouldn’t it make more sense for you to be happy the PP kids are not competing with yours? Someone is gotta be average!
BTW, l don’t push my kids because l am lazy and l also don’t care if they are average
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
.For the people who worry that their kids need certain credentials to get into a good college, and need that good college to have a successful life, add me to the chorus of anecdotal evidence that says that’s simply not true. DH and I both went to state schools — me for financial reasons, him because he’s never been particularly ambitious — and we both got into top 10 law schools from there. Once you were in, which college you went to basically never mattered again. We’ve told our middle schooler that we know she’ll get into college *somewhere* no matter what, and it doesn’t have to be a particular ranking or a particular school unless she chooses to set her sights on that. I’m already glad we made that choice, it’s so much pressure off everyone’s shoulders for the years to come
Things are far more competitive now to go to your local state school, and certainly to get into a top 10 law school. And I'm sure that to get into that top ten law school, both you and your spouse had to be top students at your state school. Rankings and hard work and focus and drive still matter--you're deluding yourself if you think otherwise, and misleading your kids..
-- law school professor
OP here. Right?!! That PP makes me so mad. Saying shit like “we’re above it all, the college admissions rat race doesn’t apply to us, DC can go to Podunk State U and still end up at HYSCCN for law school” makes me angry. First, you’re just kicking the can down the road — work ethic, academic excellence, discipline, and prestige still matter to you, but for law school. And then there’s the factor that getting into Big Law out of law school has become infinitely more competitive — so your kids will still be subject to a rat race that’s infinitely more competitive than the one you went through.
Anonymous wrote:
.For the people who worry that their kids need certain credentials to get into a good college, and need that good college to have a successful life, add me to the chorus of anecdotal evidence that says that’s simply not true. DH and I both went to state schools — me for financial reasons, him because he’s never been particularly ambitious — and we both got into top 10 law schools from there. Once you were in, which college you went to basically never mattered again. We’ve told our middle schooler that we know she’ll get into college *somewhere* no matter what, and it doesn’t have to be a particular ranking or a particular school unless she chooses to set her sights on that. I’m already glad we made that choice, it’s so much pressure off everyone’s shoulders for the years to come
Things are far more competitive now to go to your local state school, and certainly to get into a top 10 law school. And I'm sure that to get into that top ten law school, both you and your spouse had to be top students at your state school. Rankings and hard work and focus and drive still matter--you're deluding yourself if you think otherwise, and misleading your kids..
-- law school professor
.For the people who worry that their kids need certain credentials to get into a good college, and need that good college to have a successful life, add me to the chorus of anecdotal evidence that says that’s simply not true. DH and I both went to state schools — me for financial reasons, him because he’s never been particularly ambitious — and we both got into top 10 law schools from there. Once you were in, which college you went to basically never mattered again. We’ve told our middle schooler that we know she’ll get into college *somewhere* no matter what, and it doesn’t have to be a particular ranking or a particular school unless she chooses to set her sights on that. I’m already glad we made that choice, it’s so much pressure off everyone’s shoulders for the years to come
Anonymous wrote:
Do you really though? Left to their own devices, they’ll find interests of their own. But it may not be interests you value or on your preferred timeline. Therein lies the issue. You’re still seeing their lives and choices as a reflection of you.
I have a kid who has a little neighborhood side hustle with a friend. They mow lawns, rake, weed, trim hedges, etc. They make a couple hundred a week but he doesn’t even spend the money on anything as we buy his clothes, pay for his tennis lessons, lift tickets, gadgets, etc. He just wants to see the money adding up in his bank account.
Anyway, he’d rather do this than join any of the ~ 60 or so school clubs at his high school. Like newspaper or debate team or something that might look “good” on a college application. Right now he only does tennis in the spring and water polo in the winter. But no academic clubs because he wants to focus on his “business” lol. Are we supposed to say no? At least he’s doing something. It is what it is.
Anonymous wrote:People are averse to pushing kids because they most likely have a fat nest egg/inheritance. Why bother if kids inherit 5 mill each?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve been trying hard to ignore this thread but people need to hear another good why. I don’t push my kids in the way OP suggests is healthy because last year one of my friends died by suicide. He had a perfect life on paper and had always achieved and pushed for the next level. His father, even in his adulthood, pushed him relentlessly and made clear that he should always be achieving more. Nothing was good enough unless he exceeded the father’s accomplishments, which are too public and well-known to write about here. In our modern competitive world, it would be nearly impossible to pull that off two generations in a row.
We all loved my friend but now he is gone, because he got the message from the time he was a child that he was only his accomplishments and nothing would ever be enough.
I support my kids. I encourage them. I don’t push them because I want them to know they are enough and they are loved for who they are.
Thanks for posting this.
So sorry about your friend. But normally, people who are mentally ill enough to commit suicide would’ve done it no matter how hard their parents pushed. I have a feeling even if your friend had “gentle parents” they still would’ve died.
I disagree. So much of life begins with nature (genetic predisposition) but is then influenced by nurture (environmental influences). I believe we may be pointed in certain directions biologically, but our experiences and influences along the way certainly are influential, as well.
For some kids (and adults), external pressure by their parents will have marginal impact, either because they're not particularly sensitive to (natural temprament) it or because their mental health is just not that close to the "edge". Other kids (and adults) are far more sensitive to parental input and pressure, some of whom are naturally very tightly wound, anxious, or depressed already.
Those are the high-risk kids (and adults) - the ones whose internal voice + environmental influences both tell them a story of "not good enough". Again, most fall far short of suicide, of course. But even so, there's a lot of avoidable suffering due to anxiety and depression . . . .
Okay. So what do you do when you have a kid predisposed to anxiety or depression? Not push them at all?
The fact is, we all need to do some amount of pushing if we don't want failure to launch kids. Everyone (except for the trust funders) needs to hold down a relatively well-paying job to support themselves. So we need to push our kids to develop the work ethic, discipline, and habits necessary to build up to that. Being predisposed to mental illness doesn't change that.
OP, your view here is unpopular but I agree. In fact, I’d argue that kids with anxiety or depression ESPECIALLY need to be pushed — it’s one of tje core features of CBT/DBT.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’ve been trying hard to ignore this thread but people need to hear another good why. I don’t push my kids in the way OP suggests is healthy because last year one of my friends died by suicide. He had a perfect life on paper and had always achieved and pushed for the next level. His father, even in his adulthood, pushed him relentlessly and made clear that he should always be achieving more. Nothing was good enough unless he exceeded the father’s accomplishments, which are too public and well-known to write about here. In our modern competitive world, it would be nearly impossible to pull that off two generations in a row.
We all loved my friend but now he is gone, because he got the message from the time he was a child that he was only his accomplishments and nothing would ever be enough.
I support my kids. I encourage them. I don’t push them because I want them to know they are enough and they are loved for who they are.
Thanks for posting this.
So sorry about your friend. But normally, people who are mentally ill enough to commit suicide would’ve done it no matter how hard their parents pushed. I have a feeling even if your friend had “gentle parents” they still would’ve died.
I disagree. So much of life begins with nature (genetic predisposition) but is then influenced by nurture (environmental influences). I believe we may be pointed in certain directions biologically, but our experiences and influences along the way certainly are influential, as well.
For some kids (and adults), external pressure by their parents will have marginal impact, either because they're not particularly sensitive to (natural temprament) it or because their mental health is just not that close to the "edge". Other kids (and adults) are far more sensitive to parental input and pressure, some of whom are naturally very tightly wound, anxious, or depressed already.
Those are the high-risk kids (and adults) - the ones whose internal voice + environmental influences both tell them a story of "not good enough". Again, most fall far short of suicide, of course. But even so, there's a lot of avoidable suffering due to anxiety and depression . . . .
Okay. So what do you do when you have a kid predisposed to anxiety or depression? Not push them at all?
The fact is, we all need to do some amount of pushing if we don't want failure to launch kids. Everyone (except for the trust funders) needs to hold down a relatively well-paying job to support themselves. So we need to push our kids to develop the work ethic, discipline, and habits necessary to build up to that. Being predisposed to mental illness doesn't change that.