Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
No I don't think anybody, even if they go to Harvard, can listen to a doctor or scientist and discern if they are just a quack or a fully informed person.
Freedom of speech does not protect dangerous language.
So who gets to decide who is a quack vs. a fully informed person? I thought the problem was that there are "idiots" out there who are uneducated and will fall for anything. Now you're saying we can't let anyone in society, educated or not, talk to any other person, educated or not, unless both people have been vetted? Do we all have to sit inside our houses, not talk to each other, not go to the library, not use the internet, not watch TV - just sit in our chairs and get direct messages from the government, and that's it?