Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You’re 100 percent right … it’s a bunch of schools no future employer will ever take seriously. Princeton, Harvard, Brown, Northwestern, Georgetown, Columbia, UVA, Navy, Michigan, others. Seriously … what parent would want to put their kid on a club that gives them a chance to be recruited to schools like this? They must be total morons.

You should like a mom that wants their kid to go to an elite school so they can marry rich. If true, you are nothing more than a pimp.

Seriously go the f away. This misogynistic crap has no place in 2021 or on a girls athletic thread. None of these girls needs or wants to marry rich.

Not to mention that a large percentage girls in college athletics aren't looking for a GUY to do anything. I'm not saying that all women athletes are gay but I would say that if you do a tiny bit of searching you'll see that a large portion are and more power to them. So yes, it is 2021 and college is no longer just a place to get an MRS degree.

You need to go the f away too. Claiming a “large percentage” of female college athletes are gay is also inaccurate and unnecessary. Just no. Stop projecting your phobias and chauvinism onto the strongest smartest and most determined generation of girls and young women ever. These females are the future.

Ok snowflake, I wasn't posting this in a chauvinistic way (would be hard as I am a woman) but rather as a mother of a gay daughter who plays D1 athletics. If you think that my large percentage is wrong, what data are you citing? I have my information from existing athletes and through a good deal of reading and researching while my daughter was going through recruiting as I was worried about the environment she was going to. My fears were calmed quite a bit by what I found so stop looking for a fight.

No snowflakes seen around here but you are crazy.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You’re 100 percent right … it’s a bunch of schools no future employer will ever take seriously. Princeton, Harvard, Brown, Northwestern, Georgetown, Columbia, UVA, Navy, Michigan, others. Seriously … what parent would want to put their kid on a club that gives them a chance to be recruited to schools like this? They must be total morons.

You should like a mom that wants their kid to go to an elite school so they can marry rich. If true, you are nothing more than a pimp.

Seriously go the f away. This misogynistic crap has no place in 2021 or on a girls athletic thread. None of these girls needs or wants to marry rich.

Not to mention that a large percentage girls in college athletics aren't looking for a GUY to do anything. I'm not saying that all women athletes are gay but I would say that if you do a tiny bit of searching you'll see that a large portion are and more power to them. So yes, it is 2021 and college is no longer just a place to get an MRS degree.

You need to go the f away too. Claiming a “large percentage” of female college athletes are gay is also inaccurate and unnecessary. Just no. Stop projecting your phobias and chauvinism onto the strongest smartest and most determined generation of girls and young women ever. These females are the future.

Ok snowflake, I wasn't posting this in a chauvinistic way (would be hard as I am a woman) but rather as a mother of a gay daughter who plays D1 athletics. If you think that my large percentage is wrong, what data are you citing? I have my information from existing athletes and through a good deal of reading and researching while my daughter was going through recruiting as I was worried about the environment she was going to. My fears were calmed quite a bit by what I found so stop looking for a fight.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You’re 100 percent right … it’s a bunch of schools no future employer will ever take seriously. Princeton, Harvard, Brown, Northwestern, Georgetown, Columbia, UVA, Navy, Michigan, others. Seriously … what parent would want to put their kid on a club that gives them a chance to be recruited to schools like this? They must be total morons.

You should like a mom that wants their kid to go to an elite school so they can marry rich. If true, you are nothing more than a pimp.

Seriously go the f away. This misogynistic crap has no place in 2021 or on a girls athletic thread. None of these girls needs or wants to marry rich.

Not to mention that a large percentage girls in college athletics aren't looking for a GUY to do anything. I'm not saying that all women athletes are gay but I would say that if you do a tiny bit of searching you'll see that a large portion are and more power to them. So yes, it is 2021 and college is no longer just a place to get an MRS degree.

You need to go the f away too. Claiming a “large percentage” of female college athletes are gay is also inaccurate and unnecessary. Just no. Stop projecting your phobias and chauvinism onto the strongest smartest and most determined generation of girls and young women ever. These females are the future.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You’re 100 percent right … it’s a bunch of schools no future employer will ever take seriously. Princeton, Harvard, Brown, Northwestern, Georgetown, Columbia, UVA, Navy, Michigan, others. Seriously … what parent would want to put their kid on a club that gives them a chance to be recruited to schools like this? They must be total morons.

You should like a mom that wants their kid to go to an elite school so they can marry rich. If true, you are nothing more than a pimp.

Seriously go the f away. This misogynistic crap has no place in 2021 or on a girls athletic thread. None of these girls needs or wants to marry rich.

Not to mention that a large percentage girls in college athletics aren't looking for a GUY to do anything. I'm not saying that all women athletes are gay but I would say that if you do a tiny bit of searching you'll see that a large portion are and more power to them. So yes, it is 2021 and college is no longer just a place to get an MRS degree.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You’re 100 percent right … it’s a bunch of schools no future employer will ever take seriously. Princeton, Harvard, Brown, Northwestern, Georgetown, Columbia, UVA, Navy, Michigan, others. Seriously … what parent would want to put their kid on a club that gives them a chance to be recruited to schools like this? They must be total morons.

You should like a mom that wants their kid to go to an elite school so they can marry rich. If true, you are nothing more than a pimp.

Seriously go the f away. This misogynistic crap has no place in 2021 or on a girls athletic thread. None of these girls needs or wants to marry rich.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You’re 100 percent right … it’s a bunch of schools no future employer will ever take seriously. Princeton, Harvard, Brown, Northwestern, Georgetown, Columbia, UVA, Navy, Michigan, others. Seriously … what parent would want to put their kid on a club that gives them a chance to be recruited to schools like this? They must be total morons.

You should like a mom that wants their kid to go to an elite school so they can marry rich. If true, you are nothing more than a pimp.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So let me get this straight after reading 21 pages of….well…

CLC is the worse because of their ownership (someone who is respected as a player and a coach)….

CLC is awful cause the ownership offers opportunities for all players(not just CLC players) to improve their conditioning…

CLC is awful because their players played and competed with the best teams in the nation…

CLC is wrong for offering guidance on recruiting and some do and don’ts and places the responsibilities on the players to accomplish those goals….

CLC is wrong for level setting expectations for the recruiting cycle based on the cycle and it’s issues….

CLC is wrong for making sure the players take the lead role in recruiting and not the parents….

CLC is wrong for playing, coaching to improve and playing the best teams they can at tournaments versus playing in division to win their bracket and coming up short like…..hum… what is the name of that other travel team?

CLC is wrong for holding a competitive placement process and not making you commit to the team before placements of other clubs….

CLC is wrong by having 15 years of history and placing solid players in the D1 ranks….

Yet after doing all this wrong they still beat Pride 2023 black and have an unbelievable recruiting class in a tough year.

CLC turn out strong women who will accomplish much on and off the field!

Congrats Capital well earned!!!!!

Hi Gussie. Not a Pride parent or owner. But can you figure out a way to stop spamming me and my child with your training classes. I don't want them, and no matter how many times we put unsubscribe they keep on coming. I only realized who you were because of this thread talking about how wonderful you are over and over. I might believe it if your spamming didn't make you look like a scam artist.

You are pathetic...you say this over and over....report spam and unsubscribe....problem solved. You obviously want to keep getting the emails.

I'm not this PP but Healthy Baller does spam parents. I've unsubscribed and got another today. My guess is that when we register for tournaments to do the waivers they are selling our info. Not a fan of that aspect club life.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So let me get this straight after reading 21 pages of….well…

CLC is the worse because of their ownership (someone who is respected as a player and a coach)….

CLC is awful cause the ownership offers opportunities for all players(not just CLC players) to improve their conditioning…

CLC is awful because their players played and competed with the best teams in the nation…

CLC is wrong for offering guidance on recruiting and some do and don’ts and places the responsibilities on the players to accomplish those goals….

CLC is wrong for level setting expectations for the recruiting cycle based on the cycle and it’s issues….

CLC is wrong for making sure the players take the lead role in recruiting and not the parents….

CLC is wrong for playing, coaching to improve and playing the best teams they can at tournaments versus playing in division to win their bracket and coming up short like…..hum… what is the name of that other travel team?

CLC is wrong for holding a competitive placement process and not making you commit to the team before placements of other clubs….

CLC is wrong by having 15 years of history and placing solid players in the D1 ranks….

Yet after doing all this wrong they still beat Pride 2023 black and have an unbelievable recruiting class in a tough year.

CLC turn out strong women who will accomplish much on and off the field!

Congrats Capital well earned!!!!!

Hi Gussie. Not a Pride parent or owner. But can you figure out a way to stop spamming me and my child with your training classes. I don't want them, and no matter how many times we put unsubscribe they keep on coming. I only realized who you were because of this thread talking about how wonderful you are over and over. I might believe it if your spamming didn't make you look like a scam artist.

You are pathetic...you say this over and over....report spam and unsubscribe....problem solved. You obviously want to keep getting the emails.

I'm not this PP but Healthy Baller does spam parents. I've unsubscribed and got another today. My guess is that when we register for tournaments to do the waivers they are selling our info. Not a fan of that aspect club life.

Anonymous wrote:You’re 100 percent right … it’s a bunch of schools no future employer will ever take seriously. Princeton, Harvard, Brown, Northwestern, Georgetown, Columbia, UVA, Navy, Michigan, others. Seriously … what parent would want to put their kid on a club that gives them a chance to be recruited to schools like this? They must be total morons.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:So let me get this straight after reading 21 pages of….well…

CLC is the worse because of their ownership (someone who is respected as a player and a coach)….

CLC is awful cause the ownership offers opportunities for all players(not just CLC players) to improve their conditioning…

CLC is awful because their players played and competed with the best teams in the nation…

CLC is wrong for offering guidance on recruiting and some do and don’ts and places the responsibilities on the players to accomplish those goals….

CLC is wrong for level setting expectations for the recruiting cycle based on the cycle and it’s issues….

CLC is wrong for making sure the players take the lead role in recruiting and not the parents….

CLC is wrong for playing, coaching to improve and playing the best teams they can at tournaments versus playing in division to win their bracket and coming up short like…..hum… what is the name of that other travel team?

CLC is wrong for holding a competitive placement process and not making you commit to the team before placements of other clubs….

CLC is wrong by having 15 years of history and placing solid players in the D1 ranks….

Yet after doing all this wrong they still beat Pride 2023 black and have an unbelievable recruiting class in a tough year.

CLC turn out strong women who will accomplish much on and off the field!

Congrats Capital well earned!!!!!

Hi Gussie. Not a Pride parent or owner. But can you figure out a way to stop spamming me and my child with your training classes. I don't want them, and no matter how many times we put unsubscribe they keep on coming. I only realized who you were because of this thread talking about how wonderful you are over and over. I might believe it if your spamming didn't make you look like a scam artist.

You are pathetic...you say this over and over....report spam and unsubscribe....problem solved. You obviously want to keep getting the emails.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Cap 23 Blue

#7 Ranking in US Club Lax

Navy
UVA (2)
Michigan (2)
Harvard
Princeton
Columbia
Brown
Richmond
ECU
VCU
Georgetown
Northwestern
JHU
Colgate
Pitt

Did I miss anyone?

3 of these are not like the others

3 Big Ten schools?

Anonymous wrote:Cap 23 Blue

#7 Ranking in US Club Lax

Navy
UVA (2)
Michigan (2)
Harvard
Princeton
Columbia
Brown
Richmond
ECU
VCU
Georgetown
Northwestern
JHU
Colgate
Pitt

Did I miss anyone?