Anonymous wrote:Google maps do not reflect the reality of traffic bottlenecks on Randolph and the railroad tracks.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, I think we do need to raise property taxes by a lot to improve ALL the schools. That simply has to happen and we all need to prepare and budget for that.
I think this diversity exercise is uncovering a lot of inequities that need to be addressed.
But this is so divisive. The boundary changes don’t need to be so divisive.
The Crown study doesn’t have a super divisive option 3 with long distance bussing like Woodward does. Why is that? (I get that they are upset anyways but at least there is no plan to bus kids 45 minutes.)
How long is your kid's bus ride currently?
5-10 minutes to WJ
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whatever, I just hate to see the WJ community split up like this. It’s a shame and it’s been working so well for years. We expected the split with Woodward. Not Kennedy, Einstein etc.
Why on earth would you have that expectation?
You can read through the thread. Not going to repeat about earlier survey done with WJ families about expanding WJ or reopening Woodward.
So you all are just in denial about the scope of the boundary study which was approved by the BOE years ago because your community was surveyed about expanding WJ so you thought you'd get a new school all to yourselves, paid for with taxpayer dollars? You are completely unhinged.
No, we thought WJ would split into two, with DCC schools joining us for 2 nice, diverse high schools close to home. Not getting split up and bused 45 minutes across county for I guess more diversity, when diversity is right here close to home.
You are the unhinged, my friend.
None of what you are describing has happened. It is one of 4 options. Also, the drive from Farmland to Kennedy is a grand total of 9 minutes longer than the current drive from Farmland to WJ.
9 minutes longer? Completely untrue. Not sure what your source is, but I suggest you try that drive yourself. And the proper comparison point is Woodward, not WJ.
It's absolutely true, check on Google maps.
Farmland is currently assigned to WJ, not Woodward.
The proper comparison is Woodward because it is walk zone for Woodward.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Yes, I think we do need to raise property taxes by a lot to improve ALL the schools. That simply has to happen and we all need to prepare and budget for that.
I think this diversity exercise is uncovering a lot of inequities that need to be addressed.
But this is so divisive. The boundary changes don’t need to be so divisive.
The Crown study doesn’t have a super divisive option 3 with long distance bussing like Woodward does. Why is that? (I get that they are upset anyways but at least there is no plan to bus kids 45 minutes.)
How long is your kid's bus ride currently?
Anonymous wrote:Yes, I think we do need to raise property taxes by a lot to improve ALL the schools. That simply has to happen and we all need to prepare and budget for that.
I think this diversity exercise is uncovering a lot of inequities that need to be addressed.
But this is so divisive. The boundary changes don’t need to be so divisive.
The Crown study doesn’t have a super divisive option 3 with long distance bussing like Woodward does. Why is that? (I get that they are upset anyways but at least there is no plan to bus kids 45 minutes.)
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whatever, I just hate to see the WJ community split up like this. It’s a shame and it’s been working so well for years. We expected the split with Woodward. Not Kennedy, Einstein etc.
Why on earth would you have that expectation?
You can read through the thread. Not going to repeat about earlier survey done with WJ families about expanding WJ or reopening Woodward.
So you all are just in denial about the scope of the boundary study which was approved by the BOE years ago because your community was surveyed about expanding WJ so you thought you'd get a new school all to yourselves, paid for with taxpayer dollars? You are completely unhinged.
No, we thought WJ would split into two, with DCC schools joining us for 2 nice, diverse high schools close to home. Not getting split up and bused 45 minutes across county for I guess more diversity, when diversity is right here close to home.
You are the unhinged, my friend.
None of what you are describing has happened. It is one of 4 options. Also, the drive from Farmland to Kennedy is a grand total of 9 minutes longer than the current drive from Farmland to WJ.
9 minutes longer? Completely untrue. Not sure what your source is, but I suggest you try that drive yourself. And the proper comparison point is Woodward, not WJ.
It's absolutely true, check on Google maps.
Farmland is currently assigned to WJ, not Woodward.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whatever, I just hate to see the WJ community split up like this. It’s a shame and it’s been working so well for years. We expected the split with Woodward. Not Kennedy, Einstein etc.
Why on earth would you have that expectation?
You can read through the thread. Not going to repeat about earlier survey done with WJ families about expanding WJ or reopening Woodward.
So you all are just in denial about the scope of the boundary study which was approved by the BOE years ago because your community was surveyed about expanding WJ so you thought you'd get a new school all to yourselves, paid for with taxpayer dollars? You are completely unhinged.
No, we thought WJ would split into two, with DCC schools joining us for 2 nice, diverse high schools close to home. Not getting split up and bused 45 minutes across county for I guess more diversity, when diversity is right here close to home.
You are the unhinged, my friend.
None of what you are describing has happened. It is one of 4 options. Also, the drive from Farmland to Kennedy is a grand total of 9 minutes longer than the current drive from Farmland to WJ.
9 minutes longer? Completely untrue. Not sure what your source is, but I suggest you try that drive yourself. And the proper comparison point is Woodward, not WJ.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone gone to office hours to express concerns about the options? Have they been helpful/receptive?
DH went in person to give feedback. The response was “Dr Taylor says there isn’t a wrong time to do the right thing”
Well that's not promising.
I'm not gonna lie, it gives me some pleasure to see some of you squirm like this
You get pleasure at the thought of children sitting on a bus for 45 minutes twice a day because some adults make you feel less than?
That is kind of lame.
Also I don’t believe property values should be part of this discussion because a) values are unpredictable and never guarenteed, and b) on principal not relevant to the BOE whose duty is only to determine how best to educate all children.
However, I sometimes wonder if part of the motivation for east county advocates is belief that they will gain financially covered in socially acceptable rhetoric about racicom and segregation.
Lol
Property values in East county are high enough, thanks.
I get pleasure at the discomfort some of you feel about your kids going to schools you consider bad, but are comfortable with thousands of other people's kids going to those same schools.
You know they won't go to those schools, right? So the planned for diversity won't happen.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone gone to office hours to express concerns about the options? Have they been helpful/receptive?
DH went in person to give feedback. The response was “Dr Taylor says there isn’t a wrong time to do the right thing”
Well that's not promising.
I'm not gonna lie, it gives me some pleasure to see some of you squirm like this
I'm not squirming. We can afford private and can afford to move. But I think it's a bad sign for the county -- we are certainly not the only family prepared to move.
Oh no, you'll leave? Now I'm scared
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone gone to office hours to express concerns about the options? Have they been helpful/receptive?
DH went in person to give feedback. The response was “Dr Taylor says there isn’t a wrong time to do the right thing”
Well that's not promising.
I'm not gonna lie, it gives me some pleasure to see some of you squirm like this
You get pleasure at the thought of children sitting on a bus for 45 minutes twice a day because some adults make you feel less than?
That is kind of lame.
Also I don’t believe property values should be part of this discussion because a) values are unpredictable and never guarenteed, and b) on principal not relevant to the BOE whose duty is only to determine how best to educate all children.
However, I sometimes wonder if part of the motivation for east county advocates is belief that they will gain financially covered in socially acceptable rhetoric about racicom and segregation.
Lol
Property values in East county are high enough, thanks.
I get pleasure at the discomfort some of you feel about your kids going to schools you consider bad, but are comfortable with thousands of other people's kids going to those same schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has anyone gone to office hours to express concerns about the options? Have they been helpful/receptive?
DH went in person to give feedback. The response was “Dr Taylor says there isn’t a wrong time to do the right thing”
Well that's not promising.
I'm not gonna lie, it gives me some pleasure to see some of you squirm like this
You get pleasure at the thought of children sitting on a bus for 45 minutes twice a day because some adults make you feel less than?
That is kind of lame.
Also I don’t believe property values should be part of this discussion because a) values are unpredictable and never guarenteed, and b) on principal not relevant to the BOE whose duty is only to determine how best to educate all children.
However, I sometimes wonder if part of the motivation for east county advocates is belief that they will gain financially covered in socially acceptable rhetoric about racicom and segregation.
Lol
Property values in East county are high enough, thanks.
I get pleasure at the discomfort some of you feel about your kids going to schools you consider bad, but are comfortable with thousands of other people's kids going to those same schools.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Whatever, I just hate to see the WJ community split up like this. It’s a shame and it’s been working so well for years. We expected the split with Woodward. Not Kennedy, Einstein etc.
Why on earth would you have that expectation?
You can read through the thread. Not going to repeat about earlier survey done with WJ families about expanding WJ or reopening Woodward.
So you all are just in denial about the scope of the boundary study which was approved by the BOE years ago because your community was surveyed about expanding WJ so you thought you'd get a new school all to yourselves, paid for with taxpayer dollars? You are completely unhinged.
No, we thought WJ would split into two, with DCC schools joining us for 2 nice, diverse high schools close to home. Not getting split up and bused 45 minutes across county for I guess more diversity, when diversity is right here close to home.
You are the unhinged, my friend.
None of what you are describing has happened. It is one of 4 options. Also, the drive from Farmland to Kennedy is a grand total of 9 minutes longer than the current drive from Farmland to WJ.