Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An increasing number of media outlets are fact-checking Walz and finding an increasing number of fabrications:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/08/27/walz-ivf-national-guard-harris/74951463007/

Great! Now let's talk about Trump.

Reading is fundamental. How exactly did you miss the name “Tim” in the thread title?

Because frankly, a trump supporter doesn’t get to comment on anyone unless that Dem has raped one more person than Trump has, sexually assaulted one more person than Trump has, attempted to overthrow the govt one more time than Trump has, told (at minimum) 30001 lies, and is just a huge pile of excrement like Trump is.

In other words, stay quiet considering your views are at minimum, irrelevant because even basic human decency is something you haven’t achieved when choosing a candidate.

Tucker smearing Tim sounds like he’s projecting about his own experiences during prep school.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz was fact checked publicly by his own wife. Huge red flag.

Are you being sarcastic?

Walz faces criticism for misleading IVF language
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4842488-walz-infertility-treatment-misleading-statements/amp/

Earlier this week, would-be second lady Gwen Walz shared that she and her husband opted for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to deal with infertility, not in vitro fertilization (IVF) as some of the governor’s prior remarks and statements had erroneously suggested.

You are being obtuse.

Oh, well. Let's all ignore MAGAts tried to overthrow the govt, the fact that the GOP wants to do away with democracy and rights of women altogether all for their putrid pile of ORANGE dogsh*t and vote based on T H I S.

You are pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. Look at the kind of nonsense you're trying to use against him when your f***ing party wants women to have NO OPTIONS.

"Gee, I'm going to vote for the party that wants to do away with women's rights on rep. health incl. IVF, over THIS scandal!"

Walz being publicly fact checked by his wife is also really creepy because poor Mrs. Walz was forced to correct the record about something as personal as her fertility in front of America. Anyone who is married would be pissed about this. Anyone who is decent would be, too. Walz is bad news.

I admire her integrity for correcting his statements. I’m starting to wonder— maybe he does not even understand the difference? Or he wanted to garner more sympathy? Hard to know, but truly bizarre.

I think he probably figured most Americans even those who haven't dealt with infertility recognize the word IVF far more than can recognize IUI without looking it up. His entire role is relating to average Americans in an easy way

Yes. In addition anyone going through IUI understands that IVF would be the next step and would be fiercely protective of both procedures plus all the other infertility treatments.

The handwaving on this issue is really the most impressive I’ve ever seen. 9/10, at least.

Written like someone that knows little about going through infertility. It not a small community and these attacks against Walz for saying IVF and not IUI will never stick. All of these treatments are important threatening one threatens the entire community.

I know quite a bit about infertility, but thanks for assuming.
Of course they won’t stick, at least for the Dems. Their platform of JOY simply won’t allow it!

What treatments? Were they successful?

IUI unsuccessful; IVF successful.

wtf does this have to do with Walz?!?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An increasing number of media outlets are fact-checking Walz and finding an increasing number of fabrications:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/08/27/walz-ivf-national-guard-harris/74951463007/

Great! Now let's talk about Trump.

Reading is fundamental. How exactly did you miss the name “Tim” in the thread title?

dp.. the point is that walz's "lies" and embellishments are no where near the territory of Trump's, so really, nbd. All politicians embellish and lie to some degree. Walz is really no different from your standard politician; I'd actually say he's more honest than most.

But Trump? He's in his own league. But, you think people should be concerned over a few of Walz's embellishments? Um. ok.

Clearly, you are nitpicking and trying to find anything and everything that makes Walz look bad. But, the thing is, nothing, absolutely nothing in Walz' background compares to the shltshow that is Trump.

Pathetic attempt.

Thread is about Tim, idiot.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz was fact checked publicly by his own wife. Huge red flag.

Are you being sarcastic?

Walz faces criticism for misleading IVF language
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4842488-walz-infertility-treatment-misleading-statements/amp/

Earlier this week, would-be second lady Gwen Walz shared that she and her husband opted for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to deal with infertility, not in vitro fertilization (IVF) as some of the governor’s prior remarks and statements had erroneously suggested.

You are being obtuse.

Oh, well. Let's all ignore MAGAts tried to overthrow the govt, the fact that the GOP wants to do away with democracy and rights of women altogether all for their putrid pile of ORANGE dogsh*t and vote based on T H I S.

You are pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. Look at the kind of nonsense you're trying to use against him when your f***ing party wants women to have NO OPTIONS.

"Gee, I'm going to vote for the party that wants to do away with women's rights on rep. health incl. IVF, over THIS scandal!"

Walz being publicly fact checked by his wife is also really creepy because poor Mrs. Walz was forced to correct the record about something as personal as her fertility in front of America. Anyone who is married would be pissed about this. Anyone who is decent would be, too. Walz is bad news.

I admire her integrity for correcting his statements. I’m starting to wonder— maybe he does not even understand the difference? Or he wanted to garner more sympathy? Hard to know, but truly bizarre.

I think he probably figured most Americans even those who haven't dealt with infertility recognize the word IVF far more than can recognize IUI without looking it up. His entire role is relating to average Americans in an easy way

Yes. In addition anyone going through IUI understands that IVF would be the next step and would be fiercely protective of both procedures plus all the other infertility treatments.

The handwaving on this issue is really the most impressive I’ve ever seen. 9/10, at least.

Written like someone that knows little about going through infertility. It not a small community and these attacks against Walz for saying IVF and not IUI will never stick. All of these treatments are important threatening one threatens the entire community.

I know quite a bit about infertility, but thanks for assuming.
Of course they won’t stick, at least for the Dems. Their platform of JOY simply won’t allow it!

What treatments? Were they successful?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz was fact checked publicly by his own wife. Huge red flag.

Are you being sarcastic?

Walz faces criticism for misleading IVF language
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4842488-walz-infertility-treatment-misleading-statements/amp/

Earlier this week, would-be second lady Gwen Walz shared that she and her husband opted for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to deal with infertility, not in vitro fertilization (IVF) as some of the governor’s prior remarks and statements had erroneously suggested.

You are being obtuse.

Oh, well. Let's all ignore MAGAts tried to overthrow the govt, the fact that the GOP wants to do away with democracy and rights of women altogether all for their putrid pile of ORANGE dogsh*t and vote based on T H I S.

You are pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. Look at the kind of nonsense you're trying to use against him when your f***ing party wants women to have NO OPTIONS.

"Gee, I'm going to vote for the party that wants to do away with women's rights on rep. health incl. IVF, over THIS scandal!"

Walz being publicly fact checked by his wife is also really creepy because poor Mrs. Walz was forced to correct the record about something as personal as her fertility in front of America. Anyone who is married would be pissed about this. Anyone who is decent would be, too. Walz is bad news.

I admire her integrity for correcting his statements. I’m starting to wonder— maybe he does not even understand the difference? Or he wanted to garner more sympathy? Hard to know, but truly bizarre.

I think he probably figured most Americans even those who haven't dealt with infertility recognize the word IVF far more than can recognize IUI without looking it up. His entire role is relating to average Americans in an easy way

Yes. In addition anyone going through IUI understands that IVF would be the next step and would be fiercely protective of both procedures plus all the other infertility treatments.

The handwaving on this issue is really the most impressive I’ve ever seen. 9/10, at least.

Written like someone that knows little about going through infertility. It not a small community and these attacks against Walz for saying IVF and not IUI will never stick. All of these treatments are important threatening one threatens the entire community.

I know quite a bit about infertility, but thanks for assuming.
Of course they won’t stick, at least for the Dems. Their platform of JOY simply won’t allow it!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An increasing number of media outlets are fact-checking Walz and finding an increasing number of fabrications:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/08/27/walz-ivf-national-guard-harris/74951463007/

Great! Now let's talk about Trump.

Reading is fundamental. How exactly did you miss the name “Tim” in the thread title?

dp.. the point is that walz's "lies" and embellishments are no where near the territory of Trump's, so really, nbd. All politicians embellish and lie to some degree. Walz is really no different from your standard politician; I'd actually say he's more honest than most.

But Trump? He's in his own league. But, you think people should be concerned over a few of Walz's embellishments? Um. ok.

Clearly, you are nitpicking and trying to find anything and everything that makes Walz look bad. But, the thing is, nothing, absolutely nothing in Walz' background compares to the shltshow that is Trump.

Pathetic attempt.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz was fact checked publicly by his own wife. Huge red flag.

Are you being sarcastic?

Walz faces criticism for misleading IVF language
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4842488-walz-infertility-treatment-misleading-statements/amp/

Earlier this week, would-be second lady Gwen Walz shared that she and her husband opted for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to deal with infertility, not in vitro fertilization (IVF) as some of the governor’s prior remarks and statements had erroneously suggested.

You are being obtuse.

Oh, well. Let's all ignore MAGAts tried to overthrow the govt, the fact that the GOP wants to do away with democracy and rights of women altogether all for their putrid pile of ORANGE dogsh*t and vote based on T H I S.

You are pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. Look at the kind of nonsense you're trying to use against him when your f***ing party wants women to have NO OPTIONS.

"Gee, I'm going to vote for the party that wants to do away with women's rights on rep. health incl. IVF, over THIS scandal!"

Walz being publicly fact checked by his wife is also really creepy because poor Mrs. Walz was forced to correct the record about something as personal as her fertility in front of America. Anyone who is married would be pissed about this. Anyone who is decent would be, too. Walz is bad news.

I admire her integrity for correcting his statements. I’m starting to wonder— maybe he does not even understand the difference? Or he wanted to garner more sympathy? Hard to know, but truly bizarre.

I think he probably figured most Americans even those who haven't dealt with infertility recognize the word IVF far more than can recognize IUI without looking it up. His entire role is relating to average Americans in an easy way

Yes. In addition anyone going through IUI understands that IVF would be the next step and would be fiercely protective of both procedures plus all the other infertility treatments.

The handwaving on this issue is really the most impressive I’ve ever seen. 9/10, at least.

Written like someone that knows little about going through infertility. It not a small community and these attacks against Walz for saying IVF and not IUI will never stick. All of these treatments are important threatening one threatens the entire community.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz was fact checked publicly by his own wife. Huge red flag.

Are you being sarcastic?

Walz faces criticism for misleading IVF language
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4842488-walz-infertility-treatment-misleading-statements/amp/

Earlier this week, would-be second lady Gwen Walz shared that she and her husband opted for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to deal with infertility, not in vitro fertilization (IVF) as some of the governor’s prior remarks and statements had erroneously suggested.

You are being obtuse.

Oh, well. Let's all ignore MAGAts tried to overthrow the govt, the fact that the GOP wants to do away with democracy and rights of women altogether all for their putrid pile of ORANGE dogsh*t and vote based on T H I S.

You are pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. Look at the kind of nonsense you're trying to use against him when your f***ing party wants women to have NO OPTIONS.

"Gee, I'm going to vote for the party that wants to do away with women's rights on rep. health incl. IVF, over THIS scandal!"

Walz being publicly fact checked by his wife is also really creepy because poor Mrs. Walz was forced to correct the record about something as personal as her fertility in front of America. Anyone who is married would be pissed about this. Anyone who is decent would be, too. Walz is bad news.

I admire her integrity for correcting his statements. I’m starting to wonder— maybe he does not even understand the difference? Or he wanted to garner more sympathy? Hard to know, but truly bizarre.

I think he probably figured most Americans even those who haven't dealt with infertility recognize the word IVF far more than can recognize IUI without looking it up. His entire role is relating to average Americans in an easy way

Yes. In addition anyone going through IUI understands that IVF would be the next step and would be fiercely protective of both procedures plus all the other infertility treatments.

The handwaving on this issue is really the most impressive I’ve ever seen. 9/10, at least.

So you have been under a rock and have not read anything about Donald Trump for the last 8 years?

With all that he has said and done in the last 8 years and had his brainwashed MAGA still support him, is an exponentially greater amount of handwaving than what is going on here.

Did you now know that Donald Trump falsely claimed to win the 2020 election and that it was stolen, despite hundreds of election audits both hand and machine and reviews by state secretaries of state?

Did you know that Donald Trump lost over 60 court cases claiming the above and in 100% of the cases, he was told the certified results were correct and he was incorrect, but he still continues to claim he won the election, that it was stolen and that Biden is an illegitimate President?

Did you know that Donald Trump has been found guilty of sexually assaulting a woman and that by continuing to claim that he didn't, and that the victim is lying, and has defamed that victim and owes 9 figures worth of damages that he cannot afford to pay?

Did you know that Donald Trump has been found guilty of felony falsifying business documents and that he will be facing criminal sentencing in 3 weeks times?

And his supporters continue to claim everything that has gone against him are lies and that he's still a good candidate for office? Any one of these would sink any other candidates campaign, and yet his lemmings will not acknowledge that he is one of the most corrupt and felonious politicians in history.

Talk about handwaving. If Walz is a 9/10 then Trump in about 99/10.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An increasing number of media outlets are fact-checking Walz and finding an increasing number of fabrications:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/08/27/walz-ivf-national-guard-harris/74951463007/

Great! Now let's talk about Trump.

Reading is fundamental. How exactly did you miss the name “Tim” in the thread title?

How did you miss that Harris and Walz are running against trump and Vance? We should all be comparing them to each other and choose the best team.

Republicans would prefer if you didn't notice what a dumpster fire of a ticket they have selected. Really, it's unfair of us to notice any context at all when they get hyperfocused on a supposed flaw of Harris or Walz. Looking at the overall quality of those two as people or as public servants, but looking at how bad Trump or Vance are as people or public servants is just cheating.

Left our some words: "Looking at the overall quality of those two as people or as public servants is bad enough, but looking at how bad Trump or Vance are as people or public servants is just cheating."

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An increasing number of media outlets are fact-checking Walz and finding an increasing number of fabrications:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/08/27/walz-ivf-national-guard-harris/74951463007/

Great! Now let's talk about Trump.

Reading is fundamental. How exactly did you miss the name “Tim” in the thread title?

How did you miss that Harris and Walz are running against trump and Vance? We should all be comparing them to each other and choose the best team.

Republicans would prefer if you didn't notice what a dumpster fire of a ticket they have selected. Really, it's unfair of us to notice any context at all when they get hyperfocused on a supposed flaw of Harris or Walz. Looking at the overall quality of those two as people or as public servants, but looking at how bad Trump or Vance are as people or public servants is just cheating.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz was fact checked publicly by his own wife. Huge red flag.

Are you being sarcastic?

Walz faces criticism for misleading IVF language
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4842488-walz-infertility-treatment-misleading-statements/amp/

Earlier this week, would-be second lady Gwen Walz shared that she and her husband opted for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to deal with infertility, not in vitro fertilization (IVF) as some of the governor’s prior remarks and statements had erroneously suggested.

You are being obtuse.

Oh, well. Let's all ignore MAGAts tried to overthrow the govt, the fact that the GOP wants to do away with democracy and rights of women altogether all for their putrid pile of ORANGE dogsh*t and vote based on T H I S.

You are pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. Look at the kind of nonsense you're trying to use against him when your f***ing party wants women to have NO OPTIONS.

"Gee, I'm going to vote for the party that wants to do away with women's rights on rep. health incl. IVF, over THIS scandal!"

Walz being publicly fact checked by his wife is also really creepy because poor Mrs. Walz was forced to correct the record about something as personal as her fertility in front of America. Anyone who is married would be pissed about this. Anyone who is decent would be, too. Walz is bad news.

I admire her integrity for correcting his statements. I’m starting to wonder— maybe he does not even understand the difference? Or he wanted to garner more sympathy? Hard to know, but truly bizarre.

I think he probably figured most Americans even those who haven't dealt with infertility recognize the word IVF far more than can recognize IUI without looking it up. His entire role is relating to average Americans in an easy way

Yes. In addition anyone going through IUI understands that IVF would be the next step and would be fiercely protective of both procedures plus all the other infertility treatments.

The handwaving on this issue is really the most impressive I’ve ever seen. 9/10, at least.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An increasing number of media outlets are fact-checking Walz and finding an increasing number of fabrications:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/08/27/walz-ivf-national-guard-harris/74951463007/

Great! Now let's talk about Trump.

Reading is fundamental. How exactly did you miss the name “Tim” in the thread title?

How did you miss that Harris and Walz are running against trump and Vance? We should all be comparing them to each other and choose the best team.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz was fact checked publicly by his own wife. Huge red flag.

Are you being sarcastic?

Walz faces criticism for misleading IVF language
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4842488-walz-infertility-treatment-misleading-statements/amp/

Earlier this week, would-be second lady Gwen Walz shared that she and her husband opted for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to deal with infertility, not in vitro fertilization (IVF) as some of the governor’s prior remarks and statements had erroneously suggested.

You are being obtuse.

Oh, well. Let's all ignore MAGAts tried to overthrow the govt, the fact that the GOP wants to do away with democracy and rights of women altogether all for their putrid pile of ORANGE dogsh*t and vote based on T H I S.

You are pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. Look at the kind of nonsense you're trying to use against him when your f***ing party wants women to have NO OPTIONS.

"Gee, I'm going to vote for the party that wants to do away with women's rights on rep. health incl. IVF, over THIS scandal!"

Walz being publicly fact checked by his wife is also really creepy because poor Mrs. Walz was forced to correct the record about something as personal as her fertility in front of America. Anyone who is married would be pissed about this. Anyone who is decent would be, too. Walz is bad news.

I admire her integrity for correcting his statements. I’m starting to wonder— maybe he does not even understand the difference? Or he wanted to garner more sympathy? Hard to know, but truly bizarre.

I think he probably figured most Americans even those who haven't dealt with infertility recognize the word IVF far more than can recognize IUI without looking it up. His entire role is relating to average Americans in an easy way

Yes. In addition anyone going through IUI understands that IVF would be the next step and would be fiercely protective of both procedures plus all the other infertility treatments.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:An increasing number of media outlets are fact-checking Walz and finding an increasing number of fabrications:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2024/08/27/walz-ivf-national-guard-harris/74951463007/

Great! Now let's talk about Trump.

Reading is fundamental. How exactly did you miss the name “Tim” in the thread title?