Anonymous
Post 06/20/2025 00:02     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Has anyone gone to office hours to express concerns about the options? Have they been helpful/receptive?


DH went in person to give feedback. The response was “Dr Taylor says there isn’t a wrong time to do the right thing”


Well that's not promising.

I'm not gonna lie, it gives me some pleasure to see some of you squirm like this


I'm not squirming. We can afford private and can afford to move. But I think it's a bad sign for the county -- we are certainly not the only family prepared to move.
Anonymous
Post 06/19/2025 22:29     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
What is wrong with diversity?
Anonymous
Post 06/19/2025 21:47     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Has anyone gone to office hours to express concerns about the options? Have they been helpful/receptive?


DH went in person to give feedback. The response was “Dr Taylor says there isn’t a wrong time to do the right thing”


Well that's not promising.

I'm not gonna lie, it gives me some pleasure to see some of you squirm like this
Anonymous
Post 06/19/2025 21:20     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Has anyone gone to office hours to express concerns about the options? Have they been helpful/receptive?


DH went in person to give feedback. The response was “Dr Taylor says there isn’t a wrong time to do the right thing”


Well that's not promising.
Anonymous
Post 06/19/2025 21:18     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Has anyone gone to office hours to express concerns about the options? Have they been helpful/receptive?


DH went in person to give feedback. The response was “Dr Taylor says there isn’t a wrong time to do the right thing”


dear lord. what is the 'right thing'?


Diversity bus
Anonymous
Post 06/19/2025 20:10     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:Has anyone gone to office hours to express concerns about the options? Have they been helpful/receptive?


DH went in person to give feedback. The response was “Dr Taylor says there isn’t a wrong time to do the right thing”


dear lord. what is the 'right thing'?
Anonymous
Post 06/19/2025 19:51     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:Has anyone gone to office hours to express concerns about the options? Have they been helpful/receptive?


DH went in person to give feedback. The response was “Dr Taylor says there isn’t a wrong time to do the right thing”
Anonymous
Post 06/19/2025 17:57     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Has anyone gone to office hours to express concerns about the options? Have they been helpful/receptive?
Anonymous
Post 06/18/2025 11:19     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
it would have been nice if Flo Analytics had any background at all in education policy but I guess since they were the only bidders, MCPS didn't have much choice.
Anonymous
Post 06/18/2025 11:13     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
option 3 is stupid and insane
Anonymous
Post 06/18/2025 11:12     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Option 3 is the best one
Anonymous
Post 06/18/2025 10:42     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All comments submitted to MCPS should be public. They will hide the ball on responding to survey results. I expect censorship (similar to DCUM).


If there is any topic that should not be allowed to be determined by mob rule, it's this one. We all know that boundary revisions are within the authority of a school district, and that there will be "winners" and "losers" or at least people will perceive as such. That means this is the last thing MCPS should do is let folks with time and money dictate the process for everyone.


Nor should they allow the most progressive and vocal activists to prevail.



Really hoping for a middle of the road approach (btw, option 3 is not middle of the road).
Anonymous
Post 06/18/2025 10:41     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:
Anonymous wrote:All comments submitted to MCPS should be public. They will hide the ball on responding to survey results. I expect censorship (similar to DCUM).


If there is any topic that should not be allowed to be determined by mob rule, it's this one. We all know that boundary revisions are within the authority of a school district, and that there will be "winners" and "losers" or at least people will perceive as such. That means this is the last thing MCPS should do is let folks with time and money dictate the process for everyone.


Nor should they allow the most progressive and vocal activists to prevail.
Anonymous
Post 06/18/2025 09:45     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Agree!
Anonymous
Post 06/18/2025 09:21     Subject: Initial boundary options for Woodward study area are up
Anonymous wrote:All comments submitted to MCPS should be public. They will hide the ball on responding to survey results. I expect censorship (similar to DCUM).


If there is any topic that should not be allowed to be determined by mob rule, it's this one. We all know that boundary revisions are within the authority of a school district, and that there will be "winners" and "losers" or at least people will perceive as such. That means this is the last thing MCPS should do is let folks with time and money dictate the process for everyone.