Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree there is too much split articulation in Option 4. Aren’t there some tweaks that could be made to Option 1 to make it work? Like shift Wheaton Woods elementary to WJ, and Kensington Parkwood to Einstein to solve overcrowding at Wheaton and mitigate FARMS differences across the high schools?

Einstein is overcrowded.

Under option 1 Einstein goes to 83% capacity. How many kids are at Wheaton Woods (ie would adding them bring Einstein to capacity)?

The suggestion was to shift K-P to Einstein.

Kensington P should be Einstein. Not WJ or BCC.

Its right by einstein so it makes no sense.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree there is too much split articulation in Option 4. Aren’t there some tweaks that could be made to Option 1 to make it work? Like shift Wheaton Woods elementary to WJ, and Kensington Parkwood to Einstein to solve overcrowding at Wheaton and mitigate FARMS differences across the high schools?

Einstein is overcrowded.

Under option 1 Einstein goes to 83% capacity. How many kids are at Wheaton Woods (ie would adding them bring Einstein to capacity)?

The suggestion was to shift K-P to Einstein.

Kensington P should be Einstein. Not WJ or BCC.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree there is too much split articulation in Option 4. Aren’t there some tweaks that could be made to Option 1 to make it work? Like shift Wheaton Woods elementary to WJ, and Kensington Parkwood to Einstein to solve overcrowding at Wheaton and mitigate FARMS differences across the high schools?

Einstein is overcrowded.

Under option 1 Einstein goes to 83% capacity. How many kids are at Wheaton Woods (ie would adding them bring Einstein to capacity)?

The suggestion was to shift K-P to Einstein.

Anonymous wrote:All comments submitted to MCPS should be public. They will hide the ball on responding to survey results. I expect censorship (similar to DCUM).

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree there is too much split articulation in Option 4. Aren’t there some tweaks that could be made to Option 1 to make it work? Like shift Wheaton Woods elementary to WJ, and Kensington Parkwood to Einstein to solve overcrowding at Wheaton and mitigate FARMS differences across the high schools?

Einstein is overcrowded.

Under option 1 Einstein goes to 83% capacity. How many kids are at Wheaton Woods (ie would adding them bring Einstein to capacity)?

The suggestion was to shift K-P to Einstein.

Under Option 1 Einstein would be 230 seats under capacity. K-P has 90-100 kids per grade so 360 to 400 high school kids across 4 grades. You'd have to split articulate K-P, which kind of makes sense since they have that island on Tuckerman that is directly adjacent to Woodward so it doesn't make sense to bus them to Einstein.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree there is too much split articulation in Option 4. Aren’t there some tweaks that could be made to Option 1 to make it work? Like shift Wheaton Woods elementary to WJ, and Kensington Parkwood to Einstein to solve overcrowding at Wheaton and mitigate FARMS differences across the high schools?

Einstein is overcrowded.

Under option 1 Einstein goes to 83% capacity. How many kids are at Wheaton Woods (ie would adding them bring Einstein to capacity)?

The suggestion was to shift K-P to Einstein.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree there is too much split articulation in Option 4. Aren’t there some tweaks that could be made to Option 1 to make it work? Like shift Wheaton Woods elementary to WJ, and Kensington Parkwood to Einstein to solve overcrowding at Wheaton and mitigate FARMS differences across the high schools?

Einstein is overcrowded.

Under option 1 Einstein goes to 83% capacity. How many kids are at Wheaton Woods (ie would adding them bring Einstein to capacity)?

The suggestion was to shift K-P to Einstein.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree there is too much split articulation in Option 4. Aren’t there some tweaks that could be made to Option 1 to make it work? Like shift Wheaton Woods elementary to WJ, and Kensington Parkwood to Einstein to solve overcrowding at Wheaton and mitigate FARMS differences across the high schools?

Einstein is overcrowded.

Under option 1 Einstein goes to 83% capacity. How many kids are at Wheaton Woods (ie would adding them bring Einstein to capacity)?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree there is too much split articulation in Option 4. Aren’t there some tweaks that could be made to Option 1 to make it work? Like shift Wheaton Woods elementary to WJ, and Kensington Parkwood to Einstein to solve overcrowding at Wheaton and mitigate FARMS differences across the high schools?

Einstein is overcrowded.

Under option 1 Einstein goes to 83% capacity. How many kids are at Wheaton Woods (ie would adding them bring Einstein to capacity)?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I agree there is too much split articulation in Option 4. Aren’t there some tweaks that could be made to Option 1 to make it work? Like shift Wheaton Woods elementary to WJ, and Kensington Parkwood to Einstein to solve overcrowding at Wheaton and mitigate FARMS differences across the high schools?

Einstein is overcrowded.

Anonymous wrote:I agree there is too much split articulation in Option 4. Aren’t there some tweaks that could be made to Option 1 to make it work? Like shift Wheaton Woods elementary to WJ, and Kensington Parkwood to Einstein to solve overcrowding at Wheaton and mitigate FARMS differences across the high schools?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Optional 4 has Wheaton at 120% capacity. It would be very irresponsible to upend so many kids to not solve the problems the plan was designed to fix.

Apparently a poster on this thread offered a modification to it that addresses that. However, split articulation in that option remains an issue.

Solution may be to take the modication and then see how many split articulations can be eliminated. Avoid doing more than once split articuations for same set of kids.

It might be easier to just start with Option 1, which starts with zero split articulations

Exactly. Seems like RM parent spent a bit of time thinking about useful motivations to an existing option. I plan on doing that with Option 1. Crowdsourcing and brainstorming should lead to better options all around.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Optional 4 has Wheaton at 120% capacity. It would be very irresponsible to upend so many kids to not solve the problems the plan was designed to fix.

Apparently a poster on this thread offered a modification to it that addresses that. However, split articulation in that option remains an issue.

Solution may be to take the modication and then see how many split articulations can be eliminated. Avoid doing more than once split articuations for same set of kids.

It might be easier to just start with Option 1, which starts with zero split articulations

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Optional 4 has Wheaton at 120% capacity. It would be very irresponsible to upend so many kids to not solve the problems the plan was designed to fix.

Apparently a poster on this thread offered a modification to it that addresses that. However, split articulation in that option remains an issue.

Solution may be to take the modication and then see how many split articulations can be eliminated. Avoid doing more than once split articuations for same set of kids.