Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:You all are disgusting.

If Mother Teresa were on the Democratic ticket you would be asserting she is a dishonest person that slept her way to the top.

You have no shame. I am sorry your candidates suck and you cannot compete on policy. Choose better candidates next time.

Truth right here. I hope they’re paid trolls because it’s a sick way for someone to think (and in every sense of the word, unbelievable)

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what Republicans always do and it's idiotic and pathetic.

Five secs after Obama got into office, they attempted to dump the Dubya mess onto him as if the previous eight years had been caused by Obama, and when you pointed out the obvious to them: Bush and his bloodthirsty neocons created the mess and are wholly responsible for the disasters, the tiresome response would be "Why are you talking about Bush? Obama is in office."

You clowns have never changed the script ever. You're an absolute mess of traitors who can't win on your draconian policies and can't stand by the dumps you leave in your wake, so you pretend how the Walzs had their kid, is some big scandal when it isn't.

My God, grow the hell up and learn to debate and DEFEND your party's actual policies. You can't, because they're a joke. You can't even admit that Trump alone destroyed any hope of fixing the border because of how it would affect HIM. An out-of-office bloated, orange traitor stopped it from happening because it would make Biden "look good." Sickos would allow that orange thing back in the WH.

Now you are going off topic all the way back the George W Bush to deflect from Walz’s never ending misstatements and lies. If someone lies this much about themselves- imagine how much they lie about other people and issues?

Thanks for proving exactly what the PP was saying.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is what Republicans always do and it's idiotic and pathetic.

Five secs after Obama got into office, they attempted to dump the Dubya mess onto him as if the previous eight years had been caused by Obama, and when you pointed out the obvious to them: Bush and his bloodthirsty neocons created the mess and are wholly responsible for the disasters, the tiresome response would be "Why are you talking about Bush? Obama is in office."

You clowns have never changed the script ever. You're an absolute mess of traitors who can't win on your draconian policies and can't stand by the dumps you leave in your wake, so you pretend how the Walzs had their kid, is some big scandal when it isn't.

My God, grow the hell up and learn to debate and DEFEND your party's actual policies. You can't, because they're a joke. You can't even admit that Trump alone destroyed any hope of fixing the border because of how it would affect HIM. An out-of-office bloated, orange traitor stopped it from happening because it would make Biden "look good." Sickos would allow that orange thing back in the WH.

Now you are going off topic all the way back the George W Bush to deflect from Walz’s never ending misstatements and lies. If someone lies this much about themselves- imagine how much they lie about other people and issues?

Anonymous wrote:This is what Republicans always do and it's idiotic and pathetic.

Five secs after Obama got into office, they attempted to dump the Dubya mess onto him as if the previous eight years had been caused by Obama, and when you pointed out the obvious to them: Bush and his bloodthirsty neocons created the mess and are wholly responsible for the disasters, the tiresome response would be "Why are you talking about Bush? Obama is in office."

You clowns have never changed the script ever. You're an absolute mess of traitors who can't win on your draconian policies and can't stand by the dumps you leave in your wake, so you pretend how the Walzs had their kid, is some big scandal when it isn't.

My God, grow the hell up and learn to debate and DEFEND your party's actual policies. You can't, because they're a joke. You can't even admit that Trump alone destroyed any hope of fixing the border because of how it would affect HIM. An out-of-office bloated, orange traitor stopped it from happening because it would make Biden "look good." Sickos would allow that orange thing back in the WH.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz was fact checked publicly by his own wife. Huge red flag.

Are you being sarcastic?

Walz faces criticism for misleading IVF language
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4842488-walz-infertility-treatment-misleading-statements/amp/

Earlier this week, would-be second lady Gwen Walz shared that she and her husband opted for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to deal with infertility, not in vitro fertilization (IVF) as some of the governor’s prior remarks and statements had erroneously suggested.

You are being obtuse.

Oh, well. Let's all ignore MAGAts tried to overthrow the govt, the fact that the GOP wants to do away with democracy and rights of women altogether all for their putrid pile of ORANGE dogsh*t and vote based on T H I S.

You are pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. Look at the kind of nonsense you're trying to use against him when your f***ing party wants women to have NO OPTIONS.

"Gee, I'm going to vote for the party that wants to do away with women's rights on rep. health incl. IVF, over THIS scandal!"

Walz being publicly fact checked by his wife is also really creepy because poor Mrs. Walz was forced to correct the record about something as personal as her fertility in front of America. Anyone who is married would be pissed about this. Anyone who is decent would be, too. Walz is bad news.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:He’s a liar and he knows it.

This.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz was fact checked publicly by his own wife. Huge red flag.

Are you being sarcastic?

Walz faces criticism for misleading IVF language
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4842488-walz-infertility-treatment-misleading-statements/amp/

Earlier this week, would-be second lady Gwen Walz shared that she and her husband opted for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to deal with infertility, not in vitro fertilization (IVF) as some of the governor’s prior remarks and statements had erroneously suggested.

You are being obtuse.

Oh, well. Let's all ignore MAGAts tried to overthrow the govt, the fact that the GOP wants to do away with democracy and rights of women altogether all for their putrid pile of ORANGE dogsh*t and vote based on T H I S.

You are pathetic. Absolutely pathetic. Look at the kind of nonsense you're trying to use against him when your f***ing party wants women to have NO OPTIONS.

"Gee, I'm going to vote for the party that wants to do away with women's rights on rep. health incl. IVF, over THIS scandal!"

Anonymous wrote:This thread is about Walz.

Stay on topic.

Anonymous wrote:He’s a liar and he knows it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz was fact checked publicly by his own wife. Huge red flag.

Are you being sarcastic?

Walz faces criticism for misleading IVF language
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4842488-walz-infertility-treatment-misleading-statements/amp/

Earlier this week, would-be second lady Gwen Walz shared that she and her husband opted for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to deal with infertility, not in vitro fertilization (IVF) as some of the governor’s prior remarks and statements had erroneously suggested.

You are being obtuse.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Walz was fact checked publicly by his own wife. Huge red flag.

Are you being sarcastic?

Walz faces criticism for misleading IVF language
https://thehill.com/policy/healthcare/4842488-walz-infertility-treatment-misleading-statements/amp/

Earlier this week, would-be second lady Gwen Walz shared that she and her husband opted for intrauterine insemination (IUI) to deal with infertility, not in vitro fertilization (IVF) as some of the governor’s prior remarks and statements had erroneously suggested.

You are being obtuse.

So what?

There is a huge difference between IUI and IVF but you’ve all tried to hand wave it away with some bs excuses. “Everyone uses IVF as a catch all term!” No, they don’t. The catch all term is FERTILITY TREATMENT. Walz is the one who went through it. He of all people should know the correct term. He deliberately used IVF on purpose to score political points. He knows the difference between the two.

There’s no political points to score if you have to undergo either treatment. It’s tough, exhausting (emotionally and mentally), and costly.