Anonymous wrote:I to think it is pretty cool for Madison players and coaches to have the time to rile up Oakton I love the thread.
Madison has the time… Oakton to busy WINNING a State Championship… keep riling!!
Also, enjoy the thread about Oakton lucky… let’s see…if we had college rules, if player wasn’t hurt, if,,if, if…you ALL lost…
The objective is to win a State Championship… either you did OR you didn’t…. Keep whining!
Go Cougars!
Anonymous wrote:Have no idea what her 40 time is, but did hear once that her pro agility time is crazy fast. All I know is, I’ve not seen anyone as effective dodging from the top against a double or a backer zone. Her stick skills are probably better than most D1 players. As for height, this is not basketball. The fact that she will be playing for the 6th ranked D1 team in the nation says a lot. The JMU coach has a pretty good track record at finding talent.Anonymous wrote:elite high school skills - certainly not elite height or speed. She will find a niche, but lets see if she hangs 92 in a season.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oak-Ton is not a great team at all. Only reason they won this year is because the public school talent dropped tremendously in the last 2 years, so their competition this year in publics was not that great at all.
Oakton is weak
Battlefield is probably better in every area of the game except one -- #11 is just too good. She is elite talent and will excel in college.
Have no idea what her 40 time is, but did hear once that her pro agility time is crazy fast. All I know is, I’ve not seen anyone as effective dodging from the top against a double or a backer zone. Her stick skills are probably better than most D1 players. As for height, this is not basketball. The fact that she will be playing for the 6th ranked D1 team in the nation says a lot. The JMU coach has a pretty good track record at finding talent.Anonymous wrote:elite high school skills - certainly not elite height or speed. She will find a niche, but lets see if she hangs 92 in a season.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oak-Ton is not a great team at all. Only reason they won this year is because the public school talent dropped tremendously in the last 2 years, so their competition this year in publics was not that great at all.
Oakton is weak
Battlefield is probably better in every area of the game except one -- #11 is just too good. She is elite talent and will excel in college.
pure respect, my friend.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:elite high school skills - certainly not elite height or speed. She will find a niche, but lets see if she hangs 92 in a season.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oak-Ton is not a great team at all. Only reason they won this year is because the public school talent dropped tremendously in the last 2 years, so their competition this year in publics was not that great at all.
Oakton is weak
Battlefield is probably better in every area of the game except one -- #11 is just too good. She is elite talent and will excel in college.
Only one D1 player scored more than 92 goals this season. May sit on the bench her first couple years as she competes for playing time but few girls work harder than she does.
agree. Robo healthy scary good, with college-level skills. Better than oakton if both fully healthy. 5' 9" all around versus 5' 5" any day.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oak-Ton is not a great team at all. Only reason they won this year is because the public school talent dropped tremendously in the last 2 years, so their competition this year in publics was not that great at all.
Oakton is weak
I will say right now Oakton is lucky. They didn’t face Robinson with air draw specialist because she beat us when we lost to Robinson by one. And I would say Robinson when we played them was a better team than Oakton hands-down
Anonymous wrote:elite high school skills - certainly not elite height or speed. She will find a niche, but lets see if she hangs 92 in a season.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oak-Ton is not a great team at all. Only reason they won this year is because the public school talent dropped tremendously in the last 2 years, so their competition this year in publics was not that great at all.
Oakton is weak
Battlefield is probably better in every area of the game except one -- #11 is just too good. She is elite talent and will excel in college.
elite high school skills - certainly not elite height or speed. She will find a niche, but lets see if she hangs 92 in a season.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oak-Ton is not a great team at all. Only reason they won this year is because the public school talent dropped tremendously in the last 2 years, so their competition this year in publics was not that great at all.
Oakton is weak
Battlefield is probably better in every area of the game except one -- #11 is just too good. She is elite talent and will excel in college.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Oak-Ton is not a great team at all. Only reason they won this year is because the public school talent dropped tremendously in the last 2 years, so their competition this year in publics was not that great at all.
Oakton is weak
Battlefield is probably better in every area of the game except one -- #11 is just too good. She is elite talent and will excel in college.
Anonymous wrote:Oak-Ton is not a great team at all. Only reason they won this year is because the public school talent dropped tremendously in the last 2 years, so their competition this year in publics was not that great at all.
Oakton is weak
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This argument that Battlefield was the better team is pure BS. First, Battlefield had trouble scoring when Oakton was at full strength (3 BF goals were man up). Second, Oakton had numerous opportunities to score late when Battlefield was desperate, but chose not to shoot in order to use clock. Third, Oakton owned both of Battlefield’s goalies, whereas the Oakton goalie made a save even on a fast break where she was 1 v 1 with the attacker. And finally, Battlefield got a taste of how Oakton’s #11 can take over when she scored 3 straight after Battlefield scored first. Battlefield would lose at least 9 out of 10 against this year’s Oakton team. It’s also worth noting the relative difference in strength of the team Oakton crushed in the semi vs the team Battlefield beat. I think Battlefield has earned the respect of Fairfax teams and shouldn’t be taken lightly, but their loss to Oakton was no fluke, and they are definitely NOT better than Oakton.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:seems blog opinion is battlefield is better overall team, and oakton was better on one day. Now lets see if oakton parents are mature enough to accept this fact, or continue to cry "why dont people like us"? Mic drop, blog done, enjoy your summer!Anonymous wrote:Better a week or so of Oakton, Oakton, Oakton, than an entire year of Battlefield, Battlefield, Battlefield 😂Anonymous wrote:Oakton. Oakton. Oakton. Oakton. Oakton. Oakton. Oakton. Oakton. Oakton. Oakton. Oakton. Oakton.
Oakton. Oakton. Oakton.
Point on. Battlefield would probably win 6 out of 10 games head to head but all that counts is the one Oakton won. Cougars state champs !!
Battlefield is probably better in every area of the game except one -- #11 is just too good. She is elite talent and will excel in college.
Agree. Definitely not a fluke. I have it as a 50/50 game if these teams played again. Both Oakton and Battlefield have different strengths they bring to the table but none of that matters as Oakton is the state champions and #1 baby !!!
Anonymous wrote:And I will finish with this if you guys didn’t go into a semi stall, you would’ve never been able to run with Battlefield the entire game. That crap done working college Battlefield players greater than Oakton’s for next level.