Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aren’t they trying to undo free school lunches for all children?

They said “pro baby,” you’re talking about “pro child.” You see, there are gradations to the GOP’s pretending at decency.

And they’re going to do anything for babies, just say they’re for them.

Unless we’re talking about the unborn. They are all “babies”. It doesn’t matter if they are still a clump of cells (embryo) or a blob of flesh (fetus).

Anonymous wrote:LOL "pro baby". can't wait to see this.

Well at least it’s not as ridiculous as “pro life.” The party that believes in guns (i.e killing machines) can’t also be “pro life.”

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn’t going to work.

So they are basically admitting that it was never about the “babies.” It was always about using vulnerable women for political gain. They’ve shown themselves. The 15-week ban that they seem to be moving towards should be deeply offensive to the activist who have deeply held beliefs about when life begins. No one should believe their “pro-life” stance. They are using this as a culture wars/ wedge issue to get votes. They don’t care about women or babies.

Well. Yes, obviously. Yet a large swath of female voters don’t get it or see it that way or care.

And plenty of male voters. But luckily there is a significant majority of males and female voters that are not so misguided. They are motivated and are out there voting. Be against abortion but if you insist on trying to impose your religious beliefs on the rest of us, there will be a consequence on election day.

Amen!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aren’t they trying to undo free school lunches for all children?

They said “pro baby,” you’re talking about “pro child.” You see, there are gradations to the GOP’s pretending at decency.

And they’re going to do anything for babies, just say they’re for them.

Look at their approach to medicaid and SNAP. It's really pro fetus

It’s not even pro fetus. Read about the woman who just died giving birth in her cell. They don’t care about poor women who are pregnant and they are moving toward jailing women if they think she is endangering the baby. You can’t jail a woman without harming the fetus.

They are anti women

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Aren’t they trying to undo free school lunches for all children?

They said “pro baby,” you’re talking about “pro child.” You see, there are gradations to the GOP’s pretending at decency.

And they’re going to do anything for babies, just say they’re for them.

Look at their approach to medicaid and SNAP. It's really pro fetus

Anonymous wrote:Aren’t they trying to undo free school lunches for all children?

They said “pro baby,” you’re talking about “pro child.” You see, there are gradations to the GOP’s pretending at decency.

And they’re going to do anything for babies, just say they’re for them.

Anonymous wrote:LOL "pro baby". can't wait to see this.

Until the have an answer for mothers having to be near death before they qualify for an abortion, it will go over like a lead balloon

Aren’t they trying to undo free school lunches for all children?

Anonymous wrote:LOL "pro baby". can't wait to see this.

That name sounds like they’d be making choices that lead to more doctors available for maternity and pediatric care, assistance for food and nutrition for pregnant moms and children (WIC but better), paid extended family leave upon arrival of the child (especially but not only maternity leave), and free childcare for parents upon returning to work. But really it’s just spending time and resources on forcing more women to have more babies regardless of their physical or mental health concerns.

LOL "pro baby". can't wait to see this.

Anonymous wrote:This isn’t going to work.

A shorter version of the GOP: voters have noticed the cruelty of our abortion bans and we don’t like consequences. Also we don’t want voters to notice that we’re gunning for a nationwide full ban on abortion. Let’s try to change the name of the policy!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn’t going to work.

So they are basically admitting that it was never about the “babies.” It was always about using vulnerable women for political gain. They’ve shown themselves. The 15-week ban that they seem to be moving towards should be deeply offensive to the activist who have deeply held beliefs about when life begins. No one should believe their “pro-life” stance. They are using this as a culture wars/ wedge issue to get votes. They don’t care about women or babies.

Well. Yes, obviously. Yet a large swath of female voters don’t get it or see it that way or care.

And plenty of male voters. But luckily there is a significant majority of males and female voters that are not so misguided. They are motivated and are out there voting. Be against abortion but if you insist on trying to impose your religious beliefs on the rest of us, there will be a consequence on election day.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This isn’t going to work.

So they are basically admitting that it was never about the “babies.” It was always about using vulnerable women for political gain. They’ve shown themselves. The 15-week ban that they seem to be moving towards should be deeply offensive to the activist who have deeply held beliefs about when life begins. No one should believe their “pro-life” stance. They are using this as a culture wars/ wedge issue to get votes. They don’t care about women or babies.

Well. Yes, obviously. Yet a large swath of female voters don’t get it or see it that way or care.

Anonymous wrote:This isn’t going to work.

So they are basically admitting that it was never about the “babies.” It was always about using vulnerable women for political gain. They’ve shown themselves. The 15-week ban that they seem to be moving towards should be deeply offensive to the activist who have deeply held beliefs about when life begins. No one should believe their “pro-life” stance. They are using this as a culture wars/ wedge issue to get votes. They don’t care about women or babies.

Anonymous wrote:This isn’t going to work.

From the article:

“Many voters think [‘pro-life’] means you’re for no exceptions in favor of abortion ever, ever,”

Yes, that’s what happens when your side believes in forcing children to bear their rapists kids. Amazing how voters could to that conclusion that you’re not looking to make humane and common sense exceptions.