Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This interview does not seem confident. The Sheriff is using our internet tips. The dna inside the home could be from the factory who built a piece of furniture or anyone who is a neighbor, church friend, anyone. Close acquaintance rule out means nothing when it’s random dna and a home that has had visitors for decades.
https://people.com/nancy-guthrie-captor-had-target-says-sheriff-11908498
You really think so? Basically he thinks internet sleuths are making a mess and re victimizing the family.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/18/us/nancy-guthrie-kidnapping-theories-true-crime.html?unlocked_article_code=1.NVA.a8DV.8XrHITkCZMvT&smid=nytcore-ios-share
The family is not the victim. Nancy is the victim. This sheriff may be overlooking the suspects by absolving family as potential suspects
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:This interview does not seem confident. The Sheriff is using our internet tips. The dna inside the home could be from the factory who built a piece of furniture or anyone who is a neighbor, church friend, anyone. Close acquaintance rule out means nothing when it’s random dna and a home that has had visitors for decades.
https://people.com/nancy-guthrie-captor-had-target-says-sheriff-11908498
You really think so? Basically he thinks internet sleuths are making a mess and re victimizing the family.
https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/18/us/nancy-guthrie-kidnapping-theories-true-crime.html?unlocked_article_code=1.NVA.a8DV.8XrHITkCZMvT&smid=nytcore-ios-share
Anonymous wrote:This interview does not seem confident. The Sheriff is using our internet tips. The dna inside the home could be from the factory who built a piece of furniture or anyone who is a neighbor, church friend, anyone. Close acquaintance rule out means nothing when it’s random dna and a home that has had visitors for decades.
https://people.com/nancy-guthrie-captor-had-target-says-sheriff-11908498
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's hilarious that a company as sleazy as 23andme is suddenly pretending it has principles.
It’s not principles - it’s a sales tactic. People might be deterred from submitting their dna samples if they knew that the company would use it for these things. Not that a criminal would ever submit their dna to begin with.
Relatives do. That's how they found the BTK killer..
I think you mean the Golden State Killer, who was found b/c of relatives in GEDMatch, which is one of the databases that has granted law enforcement access.
Both were found through partial DNA matches.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's hilarious that a company as sleazy as 23andme is suddenly pretending it has principles.
It’s not principles - it’s a sales tactic. People might be deterred from submitting their dna samples if they knew that the company would use it for these things. Not that a criminal would ever submit their dna to begin with.
Relatives do. That's how they found the BTK killer..
I think you mean the Golden State Killer, who was found b/c of relatives in GEDMatch, which is one of the databases that has granted law enforcement access.
Both were found through partial DNA matches.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's hilarious that a company as sleazy as 23andme is suddenly pretending it has principles.
It’s not principles - it’s a sales tactic. People might be deterred from submitting their dna samples if they knew that the company would use it for these things. Not that a criminal would ever submit their dna to begin with.
Relatives do. That's how they found the BTK killer..
I think you mean the Golden State Killer, who was found b/c of relatives in GEDMatch, which is one of the databases that has granted law enforcement access.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's hilarious that a company as sleazy as 23andme is suddenly pretending it has principles.
It’s not principles - it’s a sales tactic. People might be deterred from submitting their dna samples if they knew that the company would use it for these things. Not that a criminal would ever submit their dna to begin with.
Relatives do. That's how they found the BTK killer..
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's hilarious that a company as sleazy as 23andme is suddenly pretending it has principles.
23 n Me has nothing to do with random DNA checks. You all are living in ignorance. No, police cannot just send DNA through a private"database"- it does not ever work that way. Your medical records with your blood lab and dr's office has already been hacked numerous times. But no one is finding criminals in Ancestry or 23 n Me or any of the private companies.
They run it through public databases to make a match with some very extended relative and work back from there with public records. The perp doesn't even need to have had any DNA test done. It takes a very short time to narrow down a person from one hit.
Here's what none of you get- you don't have to have ever taken a test at all. If any of your extended relatives has DNA on any site, public or private, you do too. Game is over. Your DNA is already out there, and anyone can locate anyone connected from one hit distant hit. It would take me maybe an hour to figure out who you are. Maybe less.
No one said they had anything to do with random DNA checks. The police has historically had to get a warrant but now 23andme is claiming "privacy" issues (much like apple has) and they don't want to give it. But it's not about privacy... As someone noted earlier, it's about optics for business. Sleazy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It's hilarious that a company as sleazy as 23andme is suddenly pretending it has principles.
23 n Me has nothing to do with random DNA checks. You all are living in ignorance. No, police cannot just send DNA through a private"database"- it does not ever work that way. Your medical records with your blood lab and dr's office has already been hacked numerous times. But no one is finding criminals in Ancestry or 23 n Me or any of the private companies.
They run it through public databases to make a match with some very extended relative and work back from there with public records. The perp doesn't even need to have had any DNA test done. It takes a very short time to narrow down a person from one hit.
Here's what none of you get- you don't have to have ever taken a test at all. If any of your extended relatives has DNA on any site, public or private, you do too. Game is over. Your DNA is already out there, and anyone can locate anyone connected from one hit distant hit. It would take me maybe an hour to figure out who you are. Maybe less.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:no longer on the cnn homepage
The glove was a bust I assume
Yes that’s what I’m seeing - the glove is a bust and next step is to determine if there’s any dna that could identify family members who might know who the perp is.
Also, how could someone have been in her home for 30 minutes, presumably handling Nancy, and not left any DNA?
It is not in CODIS is what I have read. Not sure why they are not running it through 23andme (yes, I know they are bankrupt) or something like them.
So many people with zero understanding gave their DNA to them. I would bet a connection could be made.