Anonymous
08/02/2025 15:50
Subject: Epstein Files
Maybe the Russians were aware and the Epstein file is the pee tape.
Anonymous
08/02/2025 15:49
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:So many pathetic attempts to distract from the fact that Trump was at the center of Epsteins pedo ring and now he’s covering it up.
He doesn't even have to be at the center of it. Just being AWARE of what Epstein was doing and SAYING NOTHING is enough. What a scumbag.
Anonymous
08/02/2025 15:39
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Expose them all. There is no reason in the world that so many of the most vile humans alive are in charge of something as important as governing our country.
Voters: hold your public servants to a higher standard, quit voting for the class bullies and douches
But if we can't vote for Republicans and Democrats, who are we to vote for?
Anonymous
08/02/2025 15:37
Subject: Epstein Files
Expose them all. There is no reason in the world that so many of the most vile humans alive are in charge of something as important as governing our country.
Voters: hold your public servants to a higher standard, quit voting for the class bullies and douches
Voters: hold your public servants to a higher standard, quit voting for the class bullies and douches
Anonymous
08/02/2025 15:26
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So many pathetic attempts to distract from the fact that Trump was at the center of Epsteins pedo ring and now he’s covering it up.
I’m a PP that made the national security comment, not with the intention of distraction, or defending non-disclosure, but rather to highlight the relevancy and magnitude of the type of conflict of interest(s) that we should expect.
Our entire political system and government needs to brace for the impact of what could be a terrible fallout of public trust in general once the files are released.
We are at a crux in history. I see the trees, I see the forest, even seedlings of the weeds… but was thinking from an eagle eyed view. I personally think we the people need to know, for the very reason you emphasized. IMO, he has always been unfit, but as a sitting president, the implications are grave.
I keep hoping the stress will burst both his carodid and aorta arteries.
+1 But not until he’s publicly, universally, and profoundly humiliated. I don’t want him to be spared that.
Absolutely, of course. I want the Trump name/brand to drown in a sea of ignobility.
Anonymous
08/02/2025 14:50
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous
08/02/2025 14:34
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So many pathetic attempts to distract from the fact that Trump was at the center of Epsteins pedo ring and now he’s covering it up.
I’m a PP that made the national security comment, not with the intention of distraction, or defending non-disclosure, but rather to highlight the relevancy and magnitude of the type of conflict of interest(s) that we should expect.
Our entire political system and government needs to brace for the impact of what could be a terrible fallout of public trust in general once the files are released.
We are at a crux in history. I see the trees, I see the forest, even seedlings of the weeds… but was thinking from an eagle eyed view. I personally think we the people need to know, for the very reason you emphasized. IMO, he has always been unfit, but as a sitting president, the implications are grave.
I keep hoping the stress will burst both his carodid and aorta arteries.
+1 But not until he’s publicly, universally, and profoundly humiliated. I don’t want him to be spared that.
Anonymous
08/02/2025 14:25
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:So many pathetic attempts to distract from the fact that Trump was at the center of Epsteins pedo ring and now he’s covering it up.
I’m a PP that made the national security comment, not with the intention of distraction, or defending non-disclosure, but rather to highlight the relevancy and magnitude of the type of conflict of interest(s) that we should expect.
Our entire political system and government needs to brace for the impact of what could be a terrible fallout of public trust in general once the files are released.
We are at a crux in history. I see the trees, I see the forest, even seedlings of the weeds… but was thinking from an eagle eyed view. I personally think we the people need to know, for the very reason you emphasized. IMO, he has always been unfit, but as a sitting president, the implications are grave.
I keep hoping the stress will burst both his carodid and aorta arteries.
Anonymous
08/02/2025 13:47
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m starting to wonder how much Hillary Clinton knew about Epstein and her husband’s and Trump’s involvement.
Back in the day she and Bill were friends with Trump. She was willing to overlook the whole Monica Lewinsky thing and stand by Bill and it’s making me wonder if she is part of the cover up - or even part of running the damn thing along with Trump and Maxwell.
It would make sense why neither party has put it all out there.
https://www.newsweek.com/jeffrey-epstein-dirt-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-brother-mark-2105478
Anything is possible but the most likely reason why these files haven't been released to the public is that there are people associated with political mega-donating entities implicated in those files. If there is one thing in this world a GOP or Dem politician will protect, it's their donors who spoil them with cash.
+1. I suspect that the files could be argued as a national security risk if whats in the documents creates a deeper unraveling of public trust in general. I also suspect not just donors being protected but also big business corporations that would experience backlash if exposed and public connects dots. I think the list runs the whole gamut of powerful, popular, influential leaders, and don’t think its limited to just US politicians.
public trust =\= national security
Public trust should 'unravel' if the recipients of the trust are, in fact, untrustworthy.
Hi, yes you’re making my point.
Anonymous
08/02/2025 13:46
Subject: Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:So many pathetic attempts to distract from the fact that Trump was at the center of Epsteins pedo ring and now he’s covering it up.
I’m a PP that made the national security comment, not with the intention of distraction, or defending non-disclosure, but rather to highlight the relevancy and magnitude of the type of conflict of interest(s) that we should expect.
Our entire political system and government needs to brace for the impact of what could be a terrible fallout of public trust in general once the files are released.
We are at a crux in history. I see the trees, I see the forest, even seedlings of the weeds… but was thinking from an eagle eyed view. I personally think we the people need to know, for the very reason you emphasized. IMO, he has always been unfit, but as a sitting president, the implications are grave.
Anonymous
Anonymous
08/02/2025 13:30
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m starting to wonder how much Hillary Clinton knew about Epstein and her husband’s and Trump’s involvement.
Back in the day she and Bill were friends with Trump. She was willing to overlook the whole Monica Lewinsky thing and stand by Bill and it’s making me wonder if she is part of the cover up - or even part of running the damn thing along with Trump and Maxwell.
It would make sense why neither party has put it all out there.
https://www.newsweek.com/jeffrey-epstein-dirt-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-brother-mark-2105478
Anything is possible but the most likely reason why these files haven't been released to the public is that there are people associated with political mega-donating entities implicated in those files. If there is one thing in this world a GOP or Dem politician will protect, it's their donors who spoil them with cash.
+1. I suspect that the files could be argued as a national security risk if whats in the documents creates a deeper unraveling of public trust in general. I also suspect not just donors being protected but also big business corporations that would experience backlash if exposed and public connects dots. I think the list runs the whole gamut of powerful, popular, influential leaders, and don’t think its limited to just US politicians.
public trust =\= national security
Public trust should 'unravel' if the recipients of the trust are, in fact, untrustworthy.
Anonymous
08/02/2025 13:28
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m starting to wonder how much Hillary Clinton knew about Epstein and her husband’s and Trump’s involvement.
Back in the day she and Bill were friends with Trump. She was willing to overlook the whole Monica Lewinsky thing and stand by Bill and it’s making me wonder if she is part of the cover up - or even part of running the damn thing along with Trump and Maxwell.
It would make sense why neither party has put it all out there.
https://www.newsweek.com/jeffrey-epstein-dirt-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-brother-mark-2105478
Anything is possible but the most likely reason why these files haven't been released to the public is that there are people associated with political mega-donating entities implicated in those files. If there is one thing in this world a GOP or Dem politician will protect, it's their donors who spoil them with cash.
+1. I suspect that the files could be argued as a national security risk if whats in the documents creates a deeper unraveling of public trust in general. I also suspect not just donors being protected but also big business corporations that would experience backlash if exposed and public connects dots. I think the list runs the whole gamut of powerful, popular, influential leaders, and don’t think its limited to just US politicians.
Withholding the information is also creating a deep unraveling of public trust. It's surely not limited to politicians, but no one should be protected regardless of their fame, wealth, or power.
Anonymous
08/02/2025 13:19
Subject: Re:Epstein Files
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I’m starting to wonder how much Hillary Clinton knew about Epstein and her husband’s and Trump’s involvement.
Back in the day she and Bill were friends with Trump. She was willing to overlook the whole Monica Lewinsky thing and stand by Bill and it’s making me wonder if she is part of the cover up - or even part of running the damn thing along with Trump and Maxwell.
It would make sense why neither party has put it all out there.
https://www.newsweek.com/jeffrey-epstein-dirt-donald-trump-hillary-clinton-brother-mark-2105478
Just stop with blaming Hillary distraction? This is all about trump and Epstein. If bill Clinton was a pedophile them bring it out but stop covering for Trump!
I’m not. I hate Trump and everything about this administration and it’s clear to me at least that he is heavily involved. I’m just starting to wonder who else is involved in the crimes or cover up. I think the corruption is far reaching and I wish everyone involved would be outed and in jail.
+100. Of course they knew. They are all involved. Trump, Clinton, the left, the right.
+200. Also suspect people in other industries that could be compromised by engaging with Epstein, et al.
Anonymous
08/02/2025 13:17
Subject: Epstein Files
So many pathetic attempts to distract from the fact that Trump was at the center of Epsteins pedo ring and now he’s covering it up.