Anonymous wrote:A more interesting discussion- what is the psychology behind the husband. ( Pls ignore the Goldwater rude). He’s smart enough- law enforcement training. His alleged affair partner not as attractive.
Is he simply a dumbass? Sorry for not being more polite
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The story about going to another room and him feeding her the combo for the safe and her quickly opening the gun safe under duress is not particularly believable. Nor is the time for delay re: the above if JR posed a true ongoing threat.
For practical reasons, BB, trained LE, had his loaded weapon in hand and could have fired again if need be. I think he did not want to fire the definitive kill shot so that if need be AP would take the fall for the more easily proved homicide, not him. Shooting someone on the ground who has been shot in the head when there was an ability to retreat (proved by going into another room) is going to be hard for her to skate on. BB really set up 3 people. And, he did not marry her during the time they were playing house before her arrest.
BB was rendering aid to CB while the AP was covering Joe.
Rendering aid while covering Joe? Ok…Brendan the LE didn’t just shoot Joe again? Instead Brendan told Juliana to go get a different gun, in a different room, in a locked safe and then come back and shoot Joe who was on the ground. Make that make sense.
And why wouldn’t have the AP render aid since she had a trained to be a nurse in Brazil?
Good question.
Unless having her take a shot to increase chances of her silence was the goal rather than CB's well being.
BB needed the AP to take the kill shot with the gun that wasn’t his service weapon. That way she sits in jail and then prison while he continues to manipulate her and possibly get away with murder. Like a previous poster said. BB set up 3 people that day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The story about going to another room and him feeding her the combo for the safe and her quickly opening the gun safe under duress is not particularly believable. Nor is the time for delay re: the above if JR posed a true ongoing threat.
For practical reasons, BB, trained LE, had his loaded weapon in hand and could have fired again if need be. I think he did not want to fire the definitive kill shot so that if need be AP would take the fall for the more easily proved homicide, not him. Shooting someone on the ground who has been shot in the head when there was an ability to retreat (proved by going into another room) is going to be hard for her to skate on. BB really set up 3 people. And, he did not marry her during the time they were playing house before her arrest.
BB was rendering aid to CB while the AP was covering Joe.
Rendering aid while covering Joe? Ok…Brendan the LE didn’t just shoot Joe again? Instead Brendan told Juliana to go get a different gun, in a different room, in a locked safe and then come back and shoot Joe who was on the ground. Make that make sense.
And why wouldn’t have the AP render aid since she had a trained to be a nurse in Brazil?
Good question.
Unless having her take a shot to increase chances of her silence was the goal rather than CB's well being.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The story about going to another room and him feeding her the combo for the safe and her quickly opening the gun safe under duress is not particularly believable. Nor is the time for delay re: the above if JR posed a true ongoing threat.
For practical reasons, BB, trained LE, had his loaded weapon in hand and could have fired again if need be. I think he did not want to fire the definitive kill shot so that if need be AP would take the fall for the more easily proved homicide, not him. Shooting someone on the ground who has been shot in the head when there was an ability to retreat (proved by going into another room) is going to be hard for her to skate on. BB really set up 3 people. And, he did not marry her during the time they were playing house before her arrest.
BB was rendering aid to CB while the AP was covering Joe.
Rendering aid while covering Joe? Ok…Brendan the LE didn’t just shoot Joe again? Instead Brendan told Juliana to go get a different gun, in a different room, in a locked safe and then come back and shoot Joe who was on the ground. Make that make sense.
And why wouldn’t have the AP render aid since she had a trained to be a nurse in Brazil?
Anonymous wrote:Even if there weren’t security cameras at the Banfield home and/or they were turned off that day, they had to have been someone in the neighborhood with a ring camera that shows when Joe came versus when AP came back versus when BB arrived
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Ap’s lawyer is paid for by the Banfields. There is a reason her lawyer isn’t trying to get her to flip. It wouldn’t bode well for their other paying client.
How do we know for certain AP’s lawyer is being paid by BB? And this may be naive in this day and age but would the lawyer be professionally and ethically bound to do the best for his client who is the AP no matter who is footing the bill?
The only people that know anything for certain are Brendan and unfortunately, deceased.
Anonymous wrote:I agree, husband planned murder set-up of his wife. If cops can’t figure that out, they’re dummies!
Anonymous wrote:Here is a theory reg the knife: what if BB stabs CB, leaves w the knife and gets rid of it ( at McDonalds, or something)—since he was counting on JR bringing his own knife, which then BB would make sure it had blood, etc— but then JR did not bring a knife, and they only found out after killing him— maybe the reason of the different 911s and hang ups, as the were trying to adjust the plan.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Ap’s lawyer is paid for by the Banfields. There is a reason her lawyer isn’t trying to get her to flip. It wouldn’t bode well for their other paying client.
How do we know for certain AP’s lawyer is being paid by BB? And this may be naive in this day and age but would the lawyer be professionally and ethically bound to do the best for his client who is the AP no matter who is footing the bill?