Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great piece by Gov. Kemp in response to this court ruling.
Stacey Abrams lost her bid to become Georgia’s governor in 2018. Almost overnight she devoted herself to peddling the fiction that her defeat was the result of voter suppression. She peddled it in talk-show appearances, interviews and magazine articles and on glitzy book tours. Ms. Abrams created a false narrative that much of her target audience was willing to accept and echo over the past four years.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/there-was-no-jim-crow-2-0-in-georgia-kemp-stacey-abrams-fair-fight-judge-jones-district-court-voting-turnout-suppression-stolen-11664890546?page=1
The difference is the whole party didn’t play along with her beliefs. We just moved on.
Uh, no. Many of you absolutely idolize her. You have done anything but “move on.”
We moved on from her claims about the 2018 election. We didn’t fall all over ourselves to believe her claims about the election, or commit felonies to try to prove her right.
The left has a habit of running out the other end of the ship when their cause fizzles out. They just find a new one to scream about. They never own their mistakes.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great piece by Gov. Kemp in response to this court ruling.
Stacey Abrams lost her bid to become Georgia’s governor in 2018. Almost overnight she devoted herself to peddling the fiction that her defeat was the result of voter suppression. She peddled it in talk-show appearances, interviews and magazine articles and on glitzy book tours. Ms. Abrams created a false narrative that much of her target audience was willing to accept and echo over the past four years.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/there-was-no-jim-crow-2-0-in-georgia-kemp-stacey-abrams-fair-fight-judge-jones-district-court-voting-turnout-suppression-stolen-11664890546?page=1
The difference is the whole party didn’t play along with her beliefs. We just moved on.
Uh, no. Many of you absolutely idolize her. You have done anything but “move on.”
We moved on from her claims about the 2018 election. We didn’t fall all over ourselves to believe her claims about the election, or commit felonies to try to prove her right.
Anonymous wrote:Kemp is good at hiding his hood.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great piece by Gov. Kemp in response to this court ruling.
Stacey Abrams lost her bid to become Georgia’s governor in 2018. Almost overnight she devoted herself to peddling the fiction that her defeat was the result of voter suppression. She peddled it in talk-show appearances, interviews and magazine articles and on glitzy book tours. Ms. Abrams created a false narrative that much of her target audience was willing to accept and echo over the past four years.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/there-was-no-jim-crow-2-0-in-georgia-kemp-stacey-abrams-fair-fight-judge-jones-district-court-voting-turnout-suppression-stolen-11664890546?page=1
The difference is the whole party didn’t play along with her beliefs. We just moved on.
Uh, no. Many of you absolutely idolize her. You have done anything but “move on.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great piece by Gov. Kemp in response to this court ruling.
Stacey Abrams lost her bid to become Georgia’s governor in 2018. Almost overnight she devoted herself to peddling the fiction that her defeat was the result of voter suppression. She peddled it in talk-show appearances, interviews and magazine articles and on glitzy book tours. Ms. Abrams created a false narrative that much of her target audience was willing to accept and echo over the past four years.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/there-was-no-jim-crow-2-0-in-georgia-kemp-stacey-abrams-fair-fight-judge-jones-district-court-voting-turnout-suppression-stolen-11664890546?page=1
The difference is the whole party didn’t play along with her beliefs. We just moved on.
Uh, no. Many of you absolutely idolize her. You have done anything but “move on.”
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Great piece by Gov. Kemp in response to this court ruling.
Stacey Abrams lost her bid to become Georgia’s governor in 2018. Almost overnight she devoted herself to peddling the fiction that her defeat was the result of voter suppression. She peddled it in talk-show appearances, interviews and magazine articles and on glitzy book tours. Ms. Abrams created a false narrative that much of her target audience was willing to accept and echo over the past four years.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/there-was-no-jim-crow-2-0-in-georgia-kemp-stacey-abrams-fair-fight-judge-jones-district-court-voting-turnout-suppression-stolen-11664890546?page=1
The difference is the whole party didn’t play along with her beliefs. We just moved on.
Anonymous wrote:Great piece by Gov. Kemp in response to this court ruling.
Stacey Abrams lost her bid to become Georgia’s governor in 2018. Almost overnight she devoted herself to peddling the fiction that her defeat was the result of voter suppression. She peddled it in talk-show appearances, interviews and magazine articles and on glitzy book tours. Ms. Abrams created a false narrative that much of her target audience was willing to accept and echo over the past four years.
https://www.wsj.com/articles/there-was-no-jim-crow-2-0-in-georgia-kemp-stacey-abrams-fair-fight-judge-jones-district-court-voting-turnout-suppression-stolen-11664890546?page=1
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Kemp is good at hiding his hood.
Please provide evidence of this statement?!?
Anonymous wrote:Kemp is good at hiding his hood.
Anonymous wrote:With Kemp with a comfortable lead, when will the originator of this thread and all the rest assured she would win going to admit they were wrong.
Honestly, If the follow Abrams lead they will never concede they lost and were wrong!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Doesn’t she still claim she won the last election?
Yes. Which Democrats don't seem to mind, contrary to their outrage over "the big lie." So curious.
She acknowledged Brian Kemp was the governor of Georgia, wished him well, and went to work changing a system she believed to be unfair without calling on her supporters to march on the Georgia state capitol. So curious.
Oh, please. She had to acknowledge Kemp was the governor. But that's a backhanded acknowledgment if I ever saw one. And no, she never actually conceded. Stop making excuses.![]()
Abrams, in the wake of her 2018 loss to Kemp by 1.4 percentage points, acknowledged that Kemp, who then worked as Georgia secretary of state, would be the governor of Georgia. But she specifically said in her final speech that she was not concede due to persistent voter suppression allegations, adding that conceding would mean acknowledging "an action is right, true or proper" and "as a woman of conscience and faith, I cannot concede that."
During an interview with CNN's "New Day" on Friday, Abrams said Kemp "won under the rules of the game at the time, but the game was rigged against the voters of Georgia."
https://www.cnn.com/2021/12/03/politics/stacey-abrams-concession-2018-georgia/index.html
PP. And? Nothing you wrote addresses anything I said. The way SA handled her loss is in no way comparable to the way DT is handling his and to imply so is completely disingenuous.
So it's okay to deny the result of an election. There's just a procedural mattet of how to do it well. Is that what you're saying?
Did she and her supporters violently storm the statehouse to overturn the election? Or did I miss that?
No - considering most of her most fervent supporters are out of state, it wouldn't have been worth it for them.