Anonymous wrote:
And when it’s pointed out that a full 20% of Proud Boys memberships are people of color, those people get attacked as race traitors. So, apparently, you have to be the right kind of person of color
Anonymous wrote:Four years ago... topic- white supremacy
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People here and GOP in the Senate may want to make excuses and rationalize Trump's words.
The actual "Proud Boys"understood exactly what he said and are making appropriate preparations.
Great, do let us know when/if they actually take action and do anything illegal. You know, like the violent rioters *actually did*.
The moment Georgetown or Northwest is under attack by Antifa, the same people outraged would welcome the Proud Boys if it helped quell the violence, looting and burning. Remember, police aren’t welcome either
Nope, I can take care of my house and my family if needed.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People here and GOP in the Senate may want to make excuses and rationalize Trump's words.
The actual "Proud Boys"understood exactly what he said and are making appropriate preparations.
Great, do let us know when/if they actually take action and do anything illegal. You know, like the violent rioters *actually did*.
The moment Georgetown or Northwest is under attack by Antifa, the same people outraged would welcome the Proud Boys if it helped quell the violence, looting and burning. Remember, police aren’t welcome either
You are absolutely out of your deranged mind. You sound like you are describing the plot of an action movie.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People here and GOP in the Senate may want to make excuses and rationalize Trump's words.
The actual "Proud Boys"understood exactly what he said and are making appropriate preparations.
Great, do let us know when/if they actually take action and do anything illegal. You know, like the violent rioters *actually did*.
The moment Georgetown or Northwest is under attack by Antifa, the same people outraged would welcome the Proud Boys if it helped quell the violence, looting and burning. Remember, police aren’t welcome either
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People here and GOP in the Senate may want to make excuses and rationalize Trump's words.
The actual "Proud Boys"understood exactly what he said and are making appropriate preparations.
Great, do let us know when/if they actually take action and do anything illegal. You know, like the violent rioters *actually did*.
The moment Georgetown or Northwest is under attack by Antifa, the same people outraged would welcome the Proud Boys if it helped quell the violence, looting and burning. Remember, police aren’t welcome either
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:People here and GOP in the Senate may want to make excuses and rationalize Trump's words.
The actual "Proud Boys"understood exactly what he said and are making appropriate preparations.
Great, do let us know when/if they actually take action and do anything illegal. You know, like the violent rioters *actually did*.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I don’t really know what to make of the statement. It isn’t a clear message of anything. It seems to be open to a variety of interruptions, which is possible what he intended. Biden didn’t make a clear statement or message in regards to Antifa either. It looks like neither wants to burn bridges with their scum voters.
Biden very clearly denounced violence. Did Trump?
“Violence” is very general. Yes of course Trump did many times.
Can you please quote the words he used?
Restoring law and order, stopping looting, rioting, violence, sending in the national guard to stop the violence, etc. It was a huge talking point that went on and on, how did you miss it?
+100
The debate was a chaotic mess, but that segment stood out because he was very clear and firm about this point.
Sorry man, Trump doesn't get a pass for failing to denounce violence on all sides. Right wing nuts are not law and order, any which way you look at it. Restoring law and order means neighborhood watch has to stand down with their AK 47s.
And your delusion is showing with your "he was very clear and firm about this" statement. He was very clear and firm about nothing at all.
Sorry, man (I’m a woman, btw) - he was indeed clear and firm about stopping the violence caused by riots. How long did it take you to even admit the riots were happening? You people are disgusting and disgraceful. You refused to call out ACTUAL LEFTIST RIOTERS but now you want everyone to be outraged about semantics? No wonder no one takes you seriously.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Stand By is what your commander says when he wants you ready for action. Trump is commander in chief. He just told them to be ready for further instructions.
I took it as ‘take note’ and stand by as ‘you are being accused and attacked - be ready to defend yourself’. Had there not been a defense of Antifa, I would agree with you
DP. I took it as “stand back and let law enforcement do their job.”
Your white hood is too tight and restricting your ability to breath.
Or, you're a racist moron.
Interesting that the only people frothing at the mouth about this are crazed liberals, desperate for the drama which they desperately need to exist. All of these wacko Nazi websites and Twitter accounts - the people clicking on them and passing them around in a tizzy are LIBERALS. I’m a moderate conservative and wouldn’t click on one of these obscure garbage sites if I was paid to do so. It’s always you leftists who know all about the extremists. No one normal pays any attention to them. I’m glad you’re getting some entertainment out of this nothingburger.
You know who else is crazed and desperately needs drama to exist and pays attention to extremists...
All trolling aside, Trump spoke directly to the Proud Boys at the debate. Your argument is demonstrably false.
Anonymous wrote:Token? He's the chairman.
I guess Thomas Sowell is another, as is Larry Elder, Walter Williams, and the millions of other black conservatives.
There is only one party of slavery, KKK, Jim Crow, segregation, etc. It's the democratic party. Please review actual history and not propaganda and rhetoric.