Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are people here trying to defend this clearly poor behavior on the part of LS? Keeping at least some dues for the travel portion of the program, where they actually provided a service with zoom meetings and home training is at least something tangible in terms of service.
The Rec kids got zippy from the Spring program. Nothing. That money should be refunded completely and the sentiment here should be unanimous on that, unless you are a travel or ECNL parent concerned that the refund of that money would cause the club to go under, which it shouldn’t since the club was also eligible for and took up some of the government’s low interest financing.
Because it’s $82? And the vitriolic posts seem completely incongruous with what is at stake?
It’s $160 and it’s robbery. Sorry LS homer. We don’t exist to subsidize your club.
If its "your" club, how were you affected and subsidizing? Very telling, FCV guy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are people here trying to defend this clearly poor behavior on the part of LS? Keeping at least some dues for the travel portion of the program, where they actually provided a service with zoom meetings and home training is at least something tangible in terms of service.
The Rec kids got zippy from the Spring program. Nothing. That money should be refunded completely and the sentiment here should be unanimous on that, unless you are a travel or ECNL parent concerned that the refund of that money would cause the club to go under, which it shouldn’t since the club was also eligible for and took up some of the government’s low interest financing.
Because it’s $82? And the vitriolic posts seem completely incongruous with what is at stake?
It’s $160 and it’s robbery. Sorry LS homer. We don’t exist to subsidize your club.
If its "your" club, how were you affected and subsidizing? Very telling, FCV guy.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are people here trying to defend this clearly poor behavior on the part of LS? Keeping at least some dues for the travel portion of the program, where they actually provided a service with zoom meetings and home training is at least something tangible in terms of service.
The Rec kids got zippy from the Spring program. Nothing. That money should be refunded completely and the sentiment here should be unanimous on that, unless you are a travel or ECNL parent concerned that the refund of that money would cause the club to go under, which it shouldn’t since the club was also eligible for and took up some of the government’s low interest financing.
Because it’s $82? And the vitriolic posts seem completely incongruous with what is at stake?
It’s $160 and it’s robbery. Sorry LS homer. We don’t exist to subsidize your club.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Why are people here trying to defend this clearly poor behavior on the part of LS? Keeping at least some dues for the travel portion of the program, where they actually provided a service with zoom meetings and home training is at least something tangible in terms of service.
The Rec kids got zippy from the Spring program. Nothing. That money should be refunded completely and the sentiment here should be unanimous on that, unless you are a travel or ECNL parent concerned that the refund of that money would cause the club to go under, which it shouldn’t since the club was also eligible for and took up some of the government’s low interest financing.
Because it’s $82? And the vitriolic posts seem completely incongruous with what is at stake?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Has loudoun done any follow up commication regarding this?
No
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am happy to say this morning my entire LS spring rec fee was refunded by my credit card. This was a Navy FCU card. The charge was made back in December and I disputed as soon as they indicated LS wouldn't refund which was way past the 60 day limit Navy FCU has. So it seems banks will work with you if you can show the chargeback is legitimate.
Did they ask you for some type of proof they didn’t render services?
Anonymous wrote:Why are people here trying to defend this clearly poor behavior on the part of LS? Keeping at least some dues for the travel portion of the program, where they actually provided a service with zoom meetings and home training is at least something tangible in terms of service.
The Rec kids got zippy from the Spring program. Nothing. That money should be refunded completely and the sentiment here should be unanimous on that, unless you are a travel or ECNL parent concerned that the refund of that money would cause the club to go under, which it shouldn’t since the club was also eligible for and took up some of the government’s low interest financing.
Anonymous wrote:I am happy to say this morning my entire LS spring rec fee was refunded by my credit card. This was a Navy FCU card. The charge was made back in December and I disputed as soon as they indicated LS wouldn't refund which was way past the 60 day limit Navy FCU has. So it seems banks will work with you if you can show the chargeback is legitimate.
Anonymous wrote:Has loudoun done any follow up commication regarding this?