Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The leaking on the left is so predictable...

You worry about the leaking, not the criminal behavior and lying by POTUS. So typical of a Republican. No one in the WH with access to the manuscript has been shown to be liberal anyway. It's probably a conservative who is concerned about a criminal "president." LOL. He's being out played at every turn.

This. So typical of the GOP. Don’t worry about the misdeed - or crime - and instead worry about the messenger who had the courage to call it out. Shameless, criminal, cowards.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The leaking on the left is so predictable...

The left? It is Bolton's book and there was a copy sent to the white house. Who on the left is involved?

The publisher? The agent? Some Obama-holdout in State?

? I thought the leak came from the WH. And I'm pretty sure Trump has gotten rid of all Obama era holdouts.

You seem to think only liberals are leakers. No. Sure, Trump cult members wouldn't leak, but there are Rs who are not Trump fans (Bolton, #neverTrumpers) who would gladly see Trump fall.

There's also Trump acolytes who have been encouraged to backstab and infight in order to get ahead. Not to mention that this is the same political team that released the "transcript" and keeps telling us to read it.

Anonymous wrote:It's incredible to me that you Trumpsters can disavow Bolton, one of the longest serving GOP advisers.

The lengths you will go for Cult Trump are really amazing.

Reagan himself could come back from the dead and criticize Trump, and you'd call him a RINO.

+1000

Anonymous wrote:Fantasy books are not evidence

"If you want a sense of how big the news is that we've heard in the last 12 or 14 hours, just listen to the Trump supporters... spinning like crazy. You get a sense that this is really an important development in this case," said Wallace.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/chris-wallace-john-bolton-claim-trump-spinning

It's incredible to me that you Trumpsters can disavow Bolton, one of the longest serving GOP advisers.

The lengths you will go for Cult Trump are really amazing.

Reagan himself could come back from the dead and criticize Trump, and you'd call him a RINO.

Anonymous wrote:Fantasy books are not evidence

You call Bolton's book "fantasy" -- yet only Republicans have suggested it be entered as evidence.

Democrats want Bolton to testify. Under oath.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fantasy books are not evidence

It's Trump "I didn't do it" and Mulvaney's "Yes he did it, get over it" defense against a solid group of witnesses and documents. The Bolton book is part of that group.

Hmm, which to believe.... this is really hard!!!

Trump supporters choose to believe one man with a long track record of lying (with easily verifiable proof of lying) vs. 100s of people who have been in his employ and orbit and have witnessed his actions firsthand who tell us unsavory things about Trump. Somehow those 100s of people, many with stellar character reputations, are all lying, and the man who lies constantly, on a daily basis, about little and big things, is the one we're supposed to believe.

Very very curious. That Trump could attract so many lying people into his orbit. Why is that?

Anonymous wrote:Fantasy books are not evidence

Then call the witness to verify under oath what was reported in the book. If it isn't true, he would say so, and then Trump would be back to not having any firsthand witnesses, other than the ones who already testified.

Anonymous wrote:Fantasy books are not evidence

It's Trump "I didn't do it" and Mulvaney's "Yes he did it, get over it" defense against a solid group of witnesses and documents. The Bolton book is part of that group.

Hmm, which to believe.... this is really hard!!!

Fantasy books are not evidence

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The leaking on the left is so predictable...

The left? It is Bolton's book and there was a copy sent to the white house. Who on the left is involved?

The publisher? The agent? Some Obama-holdout in State?

? I thought the leak came from the WH. And I'm pretty sure Trump has gotten rid of all Obama era holdouts.

You seem to think only liberals are leakers. No. Sure, Trump cult members wouldn't leak, but there are Rs who are not Trump fans (Bolton, #neverTrumpers) who would gladly see Trump fall.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The leaking on the left is so predictable...

The left? It is Bolton's book and there was a copy sent to the white house. Who on the left is involved?

The publisher? The agent? Some Obama-holdout in State?

Maybe I guess. What I would like to believe is that it is a conservative with a conscience. Fewer of them around than I would have thought but they aren’t an extinct species.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The leaking on the left is so predictable...

The left? It is Bolton's book and there was a copy sent to the white house. Who on the left is involved?

The publisher? The agent? Some Obama-holdout in State?

Wow, you are really reaching now!

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The leaking on the left is so predictable...

You worry about the leaking, not the criminal behavior and lying by POTUS. So typical of a Republican. No one in the WH with access to the manuscript has been shown to be liberal anyway. It's probably a conservative who is concerned about a criminal "president." LOL. He's being out played at every turn.

"If you can't attack the facts, attack the process."

-signed a R

Seriously. R's somehow think that if they could control leakers, then they can acquit Trump, act totally shocked when the book comes out, and then they are off the hook for not calling Bolton to testify??

Bolton did you a favor by sending these drafts around now. He made it obvious that you have to call him.

No one on the White House legal team read the manuscript after it was distributed to them. #OnlyTheBestPeople

Well you know, ignorance is bliss! And then you can't be accused of lying, if you haven't read the contents of the book, when you make false statements that are contradicted by what's in the book.

"They didn't lie.. they just didn't know the truth." -signed KAC.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The leaking on the left is so predictable...

You worry about the leaking, not the criminal behavior and lying by POTUS. So typical of a Republican. No one in the WH with access to the manuscript has been shown to be liberal anyway. It's probably a conservative who is concerned about a criminal "president." LOL. He's being out played at every turn.

"If you can't attack the facts, attack the process."

-signed a R

Seriously. R's somehow think that if they could control leakers, then they can acquit Trump, act totally shocked when the book comes out, and then they are off the hook for not calling Bolton to testify??

Bolton did you a favor by sending these drafts around now. He made it obvious that you have to call him.

No one on the White House legal team read the manuscript after it was distributed to them. #OnlyTheBestPeople

Well you know, ignorance is bliss! And then you can't be accused of lying, if you haven't read the contents of the book, when you make false statements that are contradicted by what's in the book.