LOL at the PP saying that “people” shouldn’t be having sex if they aren’t 100% ready to have a child.

Come on, now. We all know you are referring to women. You think that WOMEN shouldn’t be having sex unless they are 100% ready to have a child. Because this reasoning will never deter men from having sex. Ever.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^Disagreeing with you is ignorant and not allowed? Are you the internet police? No one ever told you that you can get pregnant every single time you have sex and yeah a partner can leave/hit you/whatever? That never occurred to you? And if your state had banned abortion, you really couldn’t have come up with $50 to get to another state? Maybe you shouldn’t have been doing it then.

Discussing abortion in a political forum without knowing what Guttmacher is is ignorant. You do know what ignorant means, right?

I think having sex when you can’t 100% take responsibility for a baby on your own is irresponsible. You know what irresponsible means, right? And then justifying getting rid of said baby because it was an inconvenience, well — we know what kind of person you are.

We know what kind of person you are, too.

I’m not the one who got rid of a baby.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^Disagreeing with you is ignorant and not allowed? Are you the internet police? No one ever told you that you can get pregnant every single time you have sex and yeah a partner can leave/hit you/whatever? That never occurred to you? And if your state had banned abortion, you really couldn’t have come up with $50 to get to another state? Maybe you shouldn’t have been doing it then.

Discussing abortion in a political forum without knowing what Guttmacher is is ignorant. You do know what ignorant means, right?

I think having sex when you can’t 100% take responsibility for a baby on your own is irresponsible. You know what irresponsible means, right? And then justifying getting rid of said baby because it was an inconvenience, well — we know what kind of person you are.

We know what kind of person you are, too.

People are having way too much irresponsible sex because in the back of their heads they know if anything happens — abortion or Plan B, NBD. Not the worst thing in the world to make access a little harder, though I fully think there need to be exceptions for the health of the mother and child and for crimes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:^Disagreeing with you is ignorant and not allowed? Are you the internet police? No one ever told you that you can get pregnant every single time you have sex and yeah a partner can leave/hit you/whatever? That never occurred to you? And if your state had banned abortion, you really couldn’t have come up with $50 to get to another state? Maybe you shouldn’t have been doing it then.

Discussing abortion in a political forum without knowing what Guttmacher is is ignorant. You do know what ignorant means, right?

I think having sex when you can’t 100% take responsibility for a baby on your own is irresponsible. You know what irresponsible means, right? And then justifying getting rid of said baby because it was an inconvenience, well — we know what kind of person you are.

Anonymous wrote:^Disagreeing with you is ignorant and not allowed? Are you the internet police? No one ever told you that you can get pregnant every single time you have sex and yeah a partner can leave/hit you/whatever? That never occurred to you? And if your state had banned abortion, you really couldn’t have come up with $50 to get to another state? Maybe you shouldn’t have been doing it then.

Discussing abortion in a political forum without knowing what Guttmacher is is ignorant. You do know what ignorant means, right?

^Disagreeing with you is ignorant and not allowed? Are you the internet police? No one ever told you that you can get pregnant every single time you have sex and yeah a partner can leave/hit you/whatever? That never occurred to you? And if your state had banned abortion, you really couldn’t have come up with $50 to get to another state? Maybe you shouldn’t have been doing it then.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don’t support the ban, but reading #youknowme —maybe people ought to consider having less sex with strangers? For every one person on there saying it was rape or a fetus with medical issues, there’s 50 saying — well I barely knew the guy . . . Uh maybe then he keeps it in his pants and you keep your underwear on?!

What makes you think abortions are the product of sex with strangers? 45% of the women having abortions are married or living with a partner.
https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-united-states

They’re fine marrying him or living with him and sleeping with him until there’s a baby and then it’s — oh I don’t want a kid with him. Read the hashtag — it really isn’t about medical problems or rape for the majority talking about it. Is it no longer taught that you can pregnant EVERY time you have sex no matter how many BC methods you’re using, so if you don’t want a baby or child support, don’t do it?!

I’m sorry, are you trying to imply that the HASHTAG YOU’RE READING has better information about who the women are who get abortions and why they get them than The Guttmacher Institute?

Don’t know who Guttmacher is but it’s in line with what I’m reading. Sex is all well and good until it’s — ew I don’t want a baby with HIM?!

Shut your ignorant mouth.

The Guttmacher Institute is the foremost authority on research into the topics of women’s health and reproductive rights.
https://www.guttmacher.org

25 years ago I had an accidental pregnancy, while on the pill, with someone I had been dating for more than a year. When I told him I was pregnant was the first time he punched me in the face - because I was ruining his future.

So no, I didn’t want to have a baby with him.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don’t support the ban, but reading #youknowme —maybe people ought to consider having less sex with strangers? For every one person on there saying it was rape or a fetus with medical issues, there’s 50 saying — well I barely knew the guy . . . Uh maybe then he keeps it in his pants and you keep your underwear on?!

What makes you think abortions are the product of sex with strangers? 45% of the women having abortions are married or living with a partner.
https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-united-states

They’re fine marrying him or living with him and sleeping with him until there’s a baby and then it’s — oh I don’t want a kid with him. Read the hashtag — it really isn’t about medical problems or rape for the majority talking about it. Is it no longer taught that you can pregnant EVERY time you have sex no matter how many BC methods you’re using, so if you don’t want a baby or child support, don’t do it?!

I’m sorry, are you trying to imply that the HASHTAG YOU’RE READING has better information about who the women are who get abortions and why they get them than The Guttmacher Institute?

Don’t know who Guttmacher is but it’s in line with what I’m reading. Sex is all well and good until it’s — ew I don’t want a baby with HIM?!

Men who create unwanted pregnancies need to be jailed so they can't do it again.

Did not read the entire thread - just first two pages and last two pages.

I have never had an abortion but know many women who have.

BECAUSE MEN CANNOT GET PREGNANT.

I would not have one unless I was raped, a victim of incest or knew my baby or I would die if I gave birth.

HOWEVER! To have 25 WHITE REPUBLICAN MEN vote on this bill outlawing it in every instance is simply disgusting.

MEN should not have a say over what WOMEN do with their bodies and how they do it.

Guess those inbreds in Alabama are afraid of limiting their future inbreds. So sick and disgusting.

An abomination quite truly.

How many abortions do you think Drump and his ugly boys have paid for? How many abortions do you think Melania has had? What an effing bunch of hypocrites and criminals.

How many of those 25 Alabama hicks do you think have paid for abortions for their "women."

Mother effers all of them.

Face it, republicans, this is not a winning issue for you.

Anonymous wrote:Don’t support the ban, but reading #youknowme —maybe people ought to consider having less sex with strangers? For every one person on there saying it was rape or a fetus with medical issues, there’s 50 saying — well I barely knew the guy . . . Uh maybe then he keeps it in his pants and you keep your underwear on?!

How about asking a woman who was the victim of one of the 1,928 rapes in Alabama last year if she ought to consider having less sex with strangers.
https://www.alea.gov/sites/default/files/inline-files/2017%20CIA.pdf

There’s a 5% likelihood that she’ll become pregnant.
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8765248

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

No, you got it all wrong. We don't want you to procreate at all. Use birth control, have as much sex as you want, don't procreate.

Bullshit. The right loses its mind every time you try to teach kids about birth control or make birth control more easily available. These are the same assholes who oppose the HPV vaccine even though it prevents cervical cancer because getting the vaccine encourages promiscuity.

We don't want it for our kids. You can do whatever you want. As long as you are sterilized.

Even sterilization has failure rates.

Ummm, no it wouldn't, because both partners would get sterilized.

What if they’re not done having children yet?

They forfeited their right to have children by allowing slaughter of over 60 million of Americans since RwW. Despite historically unprecedented freedom of choice of contraceptives, despite all rights and amazing opportunities, you chose careless sex and abortion as a form of contraception. The more choices you had to not procreate at a whim the more disdain you showed for unborn life. Sometimes having too many choices clearly leads to complete moral demise. No, please don't start with rape and incest. Everyone knows this is the tiny percentage of all abortions. Stop using rape and incest as proxy for easy access to murder for convenience.

Your "convenience" is my body and my life. You don't get to control it.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Don’t support the ban, but reading #youknowme —maybe people ought to consider having less sex with strangers? For every one person on there saying it was rape or a fetus with medical issues, there’s 50 saying — well I barely knew the guy . . . Uh maybe then he keeps it in his pants and you keep your underwear on?!

What makes you think abortions are the product of sex with strangers? 45% of the women having abortions are married or living with a partner.
https://www.guttmacher.org/fact-sheet/induced-abortion-united-states

They’re fine marrying him or living with him and sleeping with him until there’s a baby and then it’s — oh I don’t want a kid with him. Read the hashtag — it really isn’t about medical problems or rape for the majority talking about it. Is it no longer taught that you can pregnant EVERY time you have sex no matter how many BC methods you’re using, so if you don’t want a baby or child support, don’t do it?!

I’m sorry, are you trying to imply that the HASHTAG YOU’RE READING has better information about who the women are who get abortions and why they get them than The Guttmacher Institute?