Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure he's running because he's an Arlington native with two young kids in the system and he's frustrated because APS is rapidly going downhill. I'm sure he would run against any of them. In my mind the entire board gets a vote of no confidence.
But Reid in particular is really weak. He may have that one good vote against Murphy to his credit, but he's still not an effective advocate for anything.
Anonymous wrote:I does blow my mind how one of the most well financed school systems in the country continues to eff up so much stuff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I does blow my mind how one of the most well financed school systems in the country continues to eff up so much stuff.
^^^ This. Every time I am with a group of APS parents the constant refrain is how pissed off we all are at APS and what a crappy job Murphy is doing with what used to be a great system. I am voting for David Priddy for school board and I hope you all join me. Consistency and transparency -- that's what I want!
I would vote for him if he were up against NVD for sure. It looks like Priddy is running against Goldstein specifically because he has a grudge against him, though. Not a great reason to run for school board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I does blow my mind how one of the most well financed school systems in the country continues to eff up so much stuff.
^^^ This. Every time I am with a group of APS parents the constant refrain is how pissed off we all are at APS and what a crappy job Murphy is doing with what used to be a great system. I am voting for David Priddy for school board and I hope you all join me. Consistency and transparency -- that's what I want!
I would vote for him if he were up against NVD for sure. It looks like Priddy is running against Goldstein specifically because he has a grudge against him, though. Not a great reason to run for school board.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I does blow my mind how one of the most well financed school systems in the country continues to eff up so much stuff.
^^^ This. Every time I am with a group of APS parents the constant refrain is how pissed off we all are at APS and what a crappy job Murphy is doing with what used to be a great system. I am voting for David Priddy for school board and I hope you all join me. Consistency and transparency -- that's what I want!
Anonymous wrote:I does blow my mind how one of the most well financed school systems in the country continues to eff up so much stuff.
Anonymous wrote:I does blow my mind how one of the most well financed school systems in the country continues to eff up so much stuff.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:If they’re actually going to eliminate any option programs, that’s going to be a crazy battle. Moving immersion may happen eventually, but that doesn’t have to be done during this round of boundary changes. Maybe it will be, but it may be logistically too nightmarish. I think the concept of a swap was shown to be a lot of effort for little return and I would be surprised if they went back to that plan. Giving it a completely new location thereby displacing an existing neighborhood school, on the other hand, will be a huge disruption as well. I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.
I think they've finally reached the point where there is no non-disruptive option available anymore. There were various points where they could have made a different decision (Wilson site for a new elementary instead of HB Woodlawn, leaving some form of neighborhood preference at Key and Claremont, not promising Reed as a neighborhood school, stripping option status from ATS the same time as ASFS, not emphasizing the sanctity of walkzones, etc), but now they have painted themselves in a corner. It's going to be a show.
Anonymous wrote:If they’re actually going to eliminate any option programs, that’s going to be a crazy battle. Moving immersion may happen eventually, but that doesn’t have to be done during this round of boundary changes. Maybe it will be, but it may be logistically too nightmarish. I think the concept of a swap was shown to be a lot of effort for little return and I would be surprised if they went back to that plan. Giving it a completely new location thereby displacing an existing neighborhood school, on the other hand, will be a huge disruption as well. I guess we’ll just have to wait and see.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I know they've been all-consumed with the budget, but after the brouhaha that was "paused" in January, I'm surprised they're still just sitting on this with zero update.
Why is there no movement at all? I thought something is happening in June??
June is the K-12 pathways, which will presumably inform what options/programs APS will offer and/or expand. That has to happen before they decide if any programs/schools move.
So will they likely announce option school locations with pathways?