Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trying to be so exclusive is offensive to those who are kept out.
It’s not exclusive to define yourself as an ethnoreligious group. Not everyone can be a part of every group. Jews don’t proselytize for a reason; we’re happy to be who we are, and don’t feel we need tons and tons of us.
I also agree with PP; most of this thread is hugely offensive to the Jewish people.
As in, why dare you question who we think we are?
Exactly, actually. If we say, "Hey, you can be Jewish if you engage with one of the following: our religion, our ethnicity/culture, and/or you have certain genetic backgrounds (essentially Ashkenazi or Sephardic)" we would appreciate it if you would just say "ok, cool." We do not appreciate it when you say, "That's horrible/alt-right of you to say! How dare you! You are only a religion and nothing else!"
We're allowed to define what it means to be part of our group. We don't push our criteria on anyone else; in fact, we don't proselytize at all. If you want to be part of our group, you can convert. Those of us who have genetic backgrounds that are Jewish don't need to convert. This is simply how we define what it means to be Jewish. It's how we've defined it for thousands of years.
You're also allowed to argue endlessly among yourselves about who is more Jewish than whom.
Is there any sort of "authority" to settle this age old dispute? No.
Jews argue. It’s what we do, a piece of evidence that we hold education in high regard. Better to argue from a place of knowledge than sit back and just nod along. One of the most important documents in Judaism, the Talmud, is a collection of learned arguments.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trying to be so exclusive is offensive to those who are kept out.
It’s not exclusive to define yourself as an ethnoreligious group. Not everyone can be a part of every group. Jews don’t proselytize for a reason; we’re happy to be who we are, and don’t feel we need tons and tons of us.
I also agree with PP; most of this thread is hugely offensive to the Jewish people.
As in, why dare you question who we think we are?
Exactly, actually. If we say, "Hey, you can be Jewish if you engage with one of the following: our religion, our ethnicity/culture, and/or you have certain genetic backgrounds (essentially Ashkenazi or Sephardic)" we would appreciate it if you would just say "ok, cool." We do not appreciate it when you say, "That's horrible/alt-right of you to say! How dare you! You are only a religion and nothing else!"
We're allowed to define what it means to be part of our group. We don't push our criteria on anyone else; in fact, we don't proselytize at all. If you want to be part of our group, you can convert. Those of us who have genetic backgrounds that are Jewish don't need to convert. This is simply how we define what it means to be Jewish. It's how we've defined it for thousands of years.
You're also allowed to argue endlessly among yourselves about who is more Jewish than whom.
Is there any sort of "authority" to settle this age old dispute? No.
Jews argue. It’s what we do, a piece of evidence that we hold education in high regard. Better to argue from a place of knowledge than sit back and just nod along. One of the most important documents in Judaism, the Talmud, is a collection of learned arguments.

Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trying to be so exclusive is offensive to those who are kept out.
It’s not exclusive to define yourself as an ethnoreligious group. Not everyone can be a part of every group. Jews don’t proselytize for a reason; we’re happy to be who we are, and don’t feel we need tons and tons of us.
I also agree with PP; most of this thread is hugely offensive to the Jewish people.
As in, why dare you question who we think we are?
Exactly, actually. If we say, "Hey, you can be Jewish if you engage with one of the following: our religion, our ethnicity/culture, and/or you have certain genetic backgrounds (essentially Ashkenazi or Sephardic)" we would appreciate it if you would just say "ok, cool." We do not appreciate it when you say, "That's horrible/alt-right of you to say! How dare you! You are only a religion and nothing else!"
We're allowed to define what it means to be part of our group. We don't push our criteria on anyone else; in fact, we don't proselytize at all. If you want to be part of our group, you can convert. Those of us who have genetic backgrounds that are Jewish don't need to convert. This is simply how we define what it means to be Jewish. It's how we've defined it for thousands of years.
You're also allowed to argue endlessly among yourselves about who is more Jewish than whom.
Is there any sort of "authority" to settle this age old dispute? No.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trying to be so exclusive is offensive to those who are kept out.
It’s not exclusive to define yourself as an ethnoreligious group. Not everyone can be a part of every group. Jews don’t proselytize for a reason; we’re happy to be who we are, and don’t feel we need tons and tons of us.
I also agree with PP; most of this thread is hugely offensive to the Jewish people.
As in, why dare you question who we think we are?
Exactly, actually. If we say, "Hey, you can be Jewish if you engage with one of the following: our religion, our ethnicity/culture, and/or you have certain genetic backgrounds (essentially Ashkenazi or Sephardic)" we would appreciate it if you would just say "ok, cool." We do not appreciate it when you say, "That's horrible/alt-right of you to say! How dare you! You are only a religion and nothing else!"
We're allowed to define what it means to be part of our group. We don't push our criteria on anyone else; in fact, we don't proselytize at all. If you want to be part of our group, you can convert. Those of us who have genetic backgrounds that are Jewish don't need to convert. This is simply how we define what it means to be Jewish. It's how we've defined it for thousands of years.
Anonymous wrote:The idea that Ashkenazim are white but Sephardim are not white is a little nutty. Jews are generally speaking (not including Ethiopian, Indian, etc.) a population who have not been considered white for much of our history, e.g., like Armenians, Arabs, Roma, Southern Italians, etc., but who are broadly acknowledged as white for at least the last 50 years.
Also, the idea that Jews are happy with are few numbers is BS. We have these numbers because of, e.g., the Shoah, Farhud, inquisitions, pogroms, kidnappings, terrorism, forced conversions, childhood military conscriptions, etc. We could use more members. Would trade Javanka for minyans of Mexican anusim.
Anonymous wrote:To the above idea: here is one perspective (https://blogs.timesofisrael.com/ashkenazi-jews-are-not-white-response-to-haaretz-article/).
It notes that as late as 1987, the US Government did not consider Ashkenazi Jews white.
Here is one excerpt (she writes in the second person because it’s addressed to Ashkenazi Jews):
You are Jews not because of your “religion” (are you even religious?), but because you were born into a tribe/people called the Nation of Israel. You are not “white people” with a “Jewish religion”, you are Jews – members of a people who origniated in Judea, whether you adhere to the laws of the tribe or not.
Anonymous wrote:So if you are Jewish and marry a white catholic, it's an interracial marriage as the Jewish person is not white?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trying to be so exclusive is offensive to those who are kept out.
It’s not exclusive to define yourself as an ethnoreligious group. Not everyone can be a part of every group. Jews don’t proselytize for a reason; we’re happy to be who we are, and don’t feel we need tons and tons of us.
I also agree with PP; most of this thread is hugely offensive to the Jewish people.
As in, why dare you question who we think we are?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trying to be so exclusive is offensive to those who are kept out.
It’s not exclusive to define yourself as an ethnoreligious group. Not everyone can be a part of every group. Jews don’t proselytize for a reason; we’re happy to be who we are, and don’t feel we need tons and tons of us.
I also agree with PP; most of this thread is hugely offensive to the Jewish people.
This is well stated.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Trying to be so exclusive is offensive to those who are kept out.
It’s not exclusive to define yourself as an ethnoreligious group. Not everyone can be a part of every group. Jews don’t proselytize for a reason; we’re happy to be who we are, and don’t feel we need tons and tons of us.
I also agree with PP; most of this thread is hugely offensive to the Jewish people.