Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Algeria was better off as a French colony than an independent nation, any Algerian will tell you that. It's why they begged to get their colonial status back.

Look what that got.

Now this Tunisian decides to kill the best thing about his heritage - his relationship to Western Civilization.

It's getting difficult to trust anyone who can't agree on the profound and fundamental importance of a civilization which has been through the Enlightenment, and one which has not. The philosophical underpinnings to even belonging in the 21st century apparently are missing.

Liberals base much of their political identity on protecting and promoting the rights of women. It is a complete mystery to me why they are not concerned about the fact that we are importing a culture that has disregard for the rights of women as a central tenet (and I say "culture," as we can have a discussion about whether that is based on Islam or tribal law -- but the fact remains). When I see women wearing headscarves and walking behind their husbands, it makes me sad. Many of these people have no intention of assimilating and adopting the western values of equality and freedom of speech and religion that we hold dear. I would have no problem with Muslims wearing scarves if men wore them, too. The whole practice is based upon the premise that a woman's sexuality must be hidden, and men can't be expected to control themselves. Do we really want to send the message to our daughters that repressing is ok if it's your "culture."

How exactly are we importing that?

And how exactly do you dictate to people what to wear and how to walk?

Clinton plans to bring in one million refugees in her first term. How many 'lone wolves' will be hiding among them?

Every one of the terrorists so far in the USA have been US citizens born here. That's the case in Europe too. It is the same as Stopping Dylan ROof or Timothy Mcveigh, American terrorists. The solution is to look inside and stop guns from reaching those on no fly list, felons, FBI watch list etc.

Show me a link which says Hillary accepted 1Million MUSLIM refugees. US hasn't even taken in 10000 but Canada has taken in 100,000. That's ten times more when Canada population is ten times less. How many terrorist attack happened in Canada? Do what Canada does. They don't go to foreign countries on an unjust war and kill millions of foreign civilians. Canada doesn't keep its military in the Middle East for oil. Would you like if Chinese military is stationed in TX to siphon off oil and also kill millions of Americans?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Algeria was better off as a French colony than an independent nation, any Algerian will tell you that. It's why they begged to get their colonial status back.

Look what that got.

Now this Tunisian decides to kill the best thing about his heritage - his relationship to Western Civilization.

It's getting difficult to trust anyone who can't agree on the profound and fundamental importance of a civilization which has been through the Enlightenment, and one which has not. The philosophical underpinnings to even belonging in the 21st century apparently are missing.

Liberals base much of their political identity on protecting and promoting the rights of women. It is a complete mystery to me why they are not concerned about the fact that we are importing a culture that has disregard for the rights of women as a central tenet (and I say "culture," as we can have a discussion about whether that is based on Islam or tribal law -- but the fact remains). When I see women wearing headscarves and walking behind their husbands, it makes me sad. Many of these people have no intention of assimilating and adopting the western values of equality and freedom of speech and religion that we hold dear. I would have no problem with Muslims wearing scarves if men wore them, too. The whole practice is based upon the premise that a woman's sexuality must be hidden, and men can't be expected to control themselves. Do we really want to send the message to our daughters that repressing is ok if it's your "culture."

How exactly are we importing that?

And how exactly do you dictate to people what to wear and how to walk?

Clinton plans to bring in one million refugees in her first term. How many 'lone wolves' will be hiding among them?

Every one of the terrorists so far in the USA have been US citizens born here. That's the case in Europe too. It is the same as Stopping Dylan ROof or Timothy Mcveigh, American terrorists. The solution is to look inside and stop guns from reaching those on no fly list, felons, FBI watch list etc.

Show me a link which says Hillary accepted 1Million MUSLIM refugees. US hasn't even taken in 10000 but Canada has taken in 100,000. That's ten times more when Canada population is ten times less. How many terrorist attack happened in Canada? Do what Canada does. They don't go to foreign countries on an unjust war and kill millions of foreign civilians. Canada doesn't keep its military in the Middle East for oil. Would you like if Chinese military is stationed in TX to siphon off oil and also kill millions of Americans?

So...by your logic...Canada IS the country that should take them. No bad blood, fresh start, no hard feelings that will make the who out and torture and kill people. Sounds good. Canada is the solution.

Also, many of those refugees in Canada are being sponsored privately. If the wealthiest liberals in this country want to start privately funding all aspects of refugee resettlement - housing, healthcare, schools, income, English classes, etc. that's fine with me. Just don't ask the middle class taxpayer to fund it. Or is this "do as I say not as I do?" Maybe because the wealthiest and loudest liberals in this country don't have to worry about their own schools, neighborhoods, healthcare and law enforcement being strained to the limits by an influx of immigrants.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Algeria was better off as a French colony than an independent nation, any Algerian will tell you that. It's why they begged to get their colonial status back.

Look what that got.

Now this Tunisian decides to kill the best thing about his heritage - his relationship to Western Civilization.

It's getting difficult to trust anyone who can't agree on the profound and fundamental importance of a civilization which has been through the Enlightenment, and one which has not. The philosophical underpinnings to even belonging in the 21st century apparently are missing.

Liberals base much of their political identity on protecting and promoting the rights of women. It is a complete mystery to me why they are not concerned about the fact that we are importing a culture that has disregard for the rights of women as a central tenet (and I say "culture," as we can have a discussion about whether that is based on Islam or tribal law -- but the fact remains). When I see women wearing headscarves and walking behind their husbands, it makes me sad. Many of these people have no intention of assimilating and adopting the western values of equality and freedom of speech and religion that we hold dear. I would have no problem with Muslims wearing scarves if men wore them, too. The whole practice is based upon the premise that a woman's sexuality must be hidden, and men can't be expected to control themselves. Do we really want to send the message to our daughters that repressing is ok if it's your "culture."

How exactly are we importing that?

And how exactly do you dictate to people what to wear and how to walk?

Clinton plans to bring in one million refugees in her first term. How many 'lone wolves' will be hiding among them?

Every one of the terrorists so far in the USA have been US citizens born here. That's the case in Europe too. It is the same as Stopping Dylan ROof or Timothy Mcveigh, American terrorists. The solution is to look inside and stop guns from reaching those on no fly list, felons, FBI watch list etc.

Show me a link which says Hillary accepted 1Million MUSLIM refugees. US hasn't even taken in 10000 but Canada has taken in 100,000. That's ten times more when Canada population is ten times less. How many terrorist attack happened in Canada? Do what Canada does. They don't go to foreign countries on an unjust war and kill millions of foreign civilians. Canada doesn't keep its military in the Middle East for oil. Would you like if Chinese military is stationed in TX to siphon off oil and also kill millions of Americans?

So...by your logic...Canada IS the country that should take them. No bad blood, fresh start, no hard feelings that will make the who out and torture and kill people. Sounds good. Canada is the solution.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Algeria was better off as a French colony than an independent nation, any Algerian will tell you that. It's why they begged to get their colonial status back.

Look what that got.

Now this Tunisian decides to kill the best thing about his heritage - his relationship to Western Civilization.

It's getting difficult to trust anyone who can't agree on the profound and fundamental importance of a civilization which has been through the Enlightenment, and one which has not. The philosophical underpinnings to even belonging in the 21st century apparently are missing.

Liberals base much of their political identity on protecting and promoting the rights of women. It is a complete mystery to me why they are not concerned about the fact that we are importing a culture that has disregard for the rights of women as a central tenet (and I say "culture," as we can have a discussion about whether that is based on Islam or tribal law -- but the fact remains). When I see women wearing headscarves and walking behind their husbands, it makes me sad. Many of these people have no intention of assimilating and adopting the western values of equality and freedom of speech and religion that we hold dear. I would have no problem with Muslims wearing scarves if men wore them, too. The whole practice is based upon the premise that a woman's sexuality must be hidden, and men can't be expected to control themselves. Do we really want to send the message to our daughters that repressing is ok if it's your "culture."

How exactly are we importing that?

And how exactly do you dictate to people what to wear and how to walk?

Clinton plans to bring in one million refugees in her first term. How many 'lone wolves' will be hiding among them?

Every one of the terrorists so far in the USA have been US citizens born here. That's the case in Europe too. It is the same as Stopping Dylan ROof or Timothy Mcveigh, American terrorists. The solution is to look inside and stop guns from reaching those on no fly list, felons, FBI watch list etc.

Show me a link which says Hillary accepted 1Million MUSLIM refugees. US hasn't even taken in 10000 but Canada has taken in 100,000. That's ten times more when Canada population is ten times less. How many terrorist attack happened in Canada? Do what Canada does. They don't go to foreign countries on an unjust war and kill millions of foreign civilians. Canada doesn't keep its military in the Middle East for oil. Would you like if Chinese military is stationed in TX to siphon off oil and also kill millions of Americans?

So...by your logic...Canada IS the country that should take them. No bad blood, fresh start, no hard feelings that will make the who out and torture and kill people. Sounds good. Canada is the solution.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Algeria was better off as a French colony than an independent nation, any Algerian will tell you that. It's why they begged to get their colonial status back.

Look what that got.

Now this Tunisian decides to kill the best thing about his heritage - his relationship to Western Civilization.

It's getting difficult to trust anyone who can't agree on the profound and fundamental importance of a civilization which has been through the Enlightenment, and one which has not. The philosophical underpinnings to even belonging in the 21st century apparently are missing.

Liberals base much of their political identity on protecting and promoting the rights of women. It is a complete mystery to me why they are not concerned about the fact that we are importing a culture that has disregard for the rights of women as a central tenet (and I say "culture," as we can have a discussion about whether that is based on Islam or tribal law -- but the fact remains). When I see women wearing headscarves and walking behind their husbands, it makes me sad. Many of these people have no intention of assimilating and adopting the western values of equality and freedom of speech and religion that we hold dear. I would have no problem with Muslims wearing scarves if men wore them, too. The whole practice is based upon the premise that a woman's sexuality must be hidden, and men can't be expected to control themselves. Do we really want to send the message to our daughters that repressing is ok if it's your "culture."

How exactly are we importing that?

And how exactly do you dictate to people what to wear and how to walk?

Clinton plans to bring in one million refugees in her first term. How many 'lone wolves' will be hiding among them?

Every one of the terrorists so far in the USA have been US citizens born here. That's the case in Europe too. It is the same as Stopping Dylan ROof or Timothy Mcveigh, American terrorists. The solution is to look inside and stop guns from reaching those on no fly list, felons, FBI watch list etc.

Show me a link which says Hillary accepted 1Million MUSLIM refugees. US hasn't even taken in 10000 but Canada has taken in 100,000. That's ten times more when Canada population is ten times less. How many terrorist attack happened in Canada? Do what Canada does. They don't go to foreign countries on an unjust war and kill millions of foreign civilians. Canada doesn't keep its military in the Middle East for oil. Would you like if Chinese military is stationed in TX to siphon off oil and also kill millions of Americans?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Algeria was better off as a French colony than an independent nation, any Algerian will tell you that. It's why they begged to get their colonial status back.

Look what that got.

Now this Tunisian decides to kill the best thing about his heritage - his relationship to Western Civilization.

It's getting difficult to trust anyone who can't agree on the profound and fundamental importance of a civilization which has been through the Enlightenment, and one which has not. The philosophical underpinnings to even belonging in the 21st century apparently are missing.

Liberals base much of their political identity on protecting and promoting the rights of women. It is a complete mystery to me why they are not concerned about the fact that we are importing a culture that has disregard for the rights of women as a central tenet (and I say "culture," as we can have a discussion about whether that is based on Islam or tribal law -- but the fact remains). When I see women wearing headscarves and walking behind their husbands, it makes me sad. Many of these people have no intention of assimilating and adopting the western values of equality and freedom of speech and religion that we hold dear. I would have no problem with Muslims wearing scarves if men wore them, too. The whole practice is based upon the premise that a woman's sexuality must be hidden, and men can't be expected to control themselves. Do we really want to send the message to our daughters that repressing is ok if it's your "culture."

How exactly are we importing that?

And how exactly do you dictate to people what to wear and how to walk?

Clinton plans to bring in one million refugees in her first term. How many 'lone wolves' will be hiding among them?

Every one of the terrorists so far in the USA have been US citizens born here. That's the case in Europe too. It is the same as Stopping Dylan ROof or Timothy Mcveigh, American terrorists. The solution is to look inside and stop guns from reaching those on no fly list, felons, FBI watch list etc.

Show me a link which says Hillary accepted 1Million MUSLIM refugees. US hasn't even taken in 10000 but Canada has taken in 100,000. That's ten times more when Canada population is ten times less. How many terrorist attack happened in Canada? Do what Canada does. They don't go to foreign countries on an unjust war and kill millions of foreign civilians. Canada doesn't keep its military in the Middle East for oil. Would you like if Chinese military is stationed in TX to siphon off oil and also kill millions of Americans?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Algeria was better off as a French colony than an independent nation, any Algerian will tell you that. It's why they begged to get their colonial status back.

Look what that got.

Now this Tunisian decides to kill the best thing about his heritage - his relationship to Western Civilization.

It's getting difficult to trust anyone who can't agree on the profound and fundamental importance of a civilization which has been through the Enlightenment, and one which has not. The philosophical underpinnings to even belonging in the 21st century apparently are missing.

Liberals base much of their political identity on protecting and promoting the rights of women. It is a complete mystery to me why they are not concerned about the fact that we are importing a culture that has disregard for the rights of women as a central tenet (and I say "culture," as we can have a discussion about whether that is based on Islam or tribal law -- but the fact remains). When I see women wearing headscarves and walking behind their husbands, it makes me sad. Many of these people have no intention of assimilating and adopting the western values of equality and freedom of speech and religion that we hold dear. I would have no problem with Muslims wearing scarves if men wore them, too. The whole practice is based upon the premise that a woman's sexuality must be hidden, and men can't be expected to control themselves. Do we really want to send the message to our daughters that repressing is ok if it's your "culture."

How exactly are we importing that?

And how exactly do you dictate to people what to wear and how to walk?

Clinton plans to bring in one million refugees in her first term. How many 'lone wolves' will be hiding among them?

Every one of the terrorists so far in the USA have been US citizens born here. That's the case in Europe too. It is the same as Stopping Dylan ROof or Timothy Mcveigh, American terrorists. The solution is to look inside and stop guns from reaching those on no fly list, felons, FBI watch list etc.

Show me a link which says Hillary accepted 1Million MUSLIM refugees. US hasn't even taken in 10000 but Canada has taken in 100,000. That's ten times more when Canada population is ten times less. How many terrorist attack happened in Canada? Do what Canada does. They don't go to foreign countries on an unjust war and kill millions of foreign civilians. Canada doesn't keep its military in the Middle East for oil. Would you like if Chinese military is stationed in TX to siphon off oil and also kill millions of Americans?

They were the children of immigrants. Both were Muslim. They did not have an allegiance to the US. Not really US citizens except on paper. The Orlando shooter cheered when 911 happened. Things have changed and so must we and our constitution may need to be amended as well to accomdate the changes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Algeria was better off as a French colony than an independent nation, any Algerian will tell you that. It's why they begged to get their colonial status back.

Look what that got.

Now this Tunisian decides to kill the best thing about his heritage - his relationship to Western Civilization.

It's getting difficult to trust anyone who can't agree on the profound and fundamental importance of a civilization which has been through the Enlightenment, and one which has not. The philosophical underpinnings to even belonging in the 21st century apparently are missing.

Liberals base much of their political identity on protecting and promoting the rights of women. It is a complete mystery to me why they are not concerned about the fact that we are importing a culture that has disregard for the rights of women as a central tenet (and I say "culture," as we can have a discussion about whether that is based on Islam or tribal law -- but the fact remains). When I see women wearing headscarves and walking behind their husbands, it makes me sad. Many of these people have no intention of assimilating and adopting the western values of equality and freedom of speech and religion that we hold dear. I would have no problem with Muslims wearing scarves if men wore them, too. The whole practice is based upon the premise that a woman's sexuality must be hidden, and men can't be expected to control themselves. Do we really want to send the message to our daughters that repressing is ok if it's your "culture."

How exactly are we importing that?

And how exactly do you dictate to people what to wear and how to walk?

Clinton plans to bring in one million refugees in her first term. How many 'lone wolves' will be hiding among them?

Every one of the terrorists so far in the USA have been US citizens born here. That's the case in Europe too. It is the same as Stopping Dylan ROof or Timothy Mcveigh, American terrorists. The solution is to look inside and stop guns from reaching those on no fly list, felons, FBI watch list etc.

Show me a link which says Hillary accepted 1Million MUSLIM refugees. US hasn't even taken in 10000 but Canada has taken in 100,000. That's ten times more when Canada population is ten times less. How many terrorist attack happened in Canada? Do what Canada does. They don't go to foreign countries on an unjust war and kill millions of foreign civilians. Canada doesn't keep its military in the Middle East for oil. Would you like if Chinese military is stationed in TX to siphon off oil and also kill millions of Americans?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:It appears he was only Muslim in the sense that he was born into that religion.

He wasn't practicing--he didn't attend mosque, didn't fast during Ramadan, drank, did drugs, and ate pork. He also had a violent criminal past and beat his wife. What he didn't have is any discernible connection to any Islamic groups, let alone ISIS.

He seems to fit the classic profile of the angry and alienated loner. This should sound familiar to Americans as most of the perpetrators of all the born and bred in the US incidents of mass violence fit this profile. And they are pretty much all white.

Those saying that he was Muslim explains all are very off in their analysis. It would be far more on target to say that he was a wife beater and that explains all.

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/world/nice-attacker-mohamed-lahouaiej-bouhlel-article-1.2712654

I listened to a segment on NPR where they were able to use some mathematical formula to track activity on social media. The expert (trained in physics) said they didn't believe in Lone Wolves b/c they are usually connected to some group - if even for a short time. These groups converge and then break apart, and there's usually more activity before some major event occurs. So he was most likely part of something.

What about the weapons and grenades found in his truck? Maybe I'm simple - But is it easy to get grenades?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Algeria was better off as a French colony than an independent nation, any Algerian will tell you that. It's why they begged to get their colonial status back.

Look what that got.

Now this Tunisian decides to kill the best thing about his heritage - his relationship to Western Civilization.

It's getting difficult to trust anyone who can't agree on the profound and fundamental importance of a civilization which has been through the Enlightenment, and one which has not. The philosophical underpinnings to even belonging in the 21st century apparently are missing.

Liberals base much of their political identity on protecting and promoting the rights of women. It is a complete mystery to me why they are not concerned about the fact that we are importing a culture that has disregard for the rights of women as a central tenet (and I say "culture," as we can have a discussion about whether that is based on Islam or tribal law -- but the fact remains). When I see women wearing headscarves and walking behind their husbands, it makes me sad. Many of these people have no intention of assimilating and adopting the western values of equality and freedom of speech and religion that we hold dear. I would have no problem with Muslims wearing scarves if men wore them, too. The whole practice is based upon the premise that a woman's sexuality must be hidden, and men can't be expected to control themselves. Do we really want to send the message to our daughters that repressing is ok if it's your "culture."

How exactly are we importing that?

And how exactly do you dictate to people what to wear and how to walk?

Clinton plans to bring in one million refugees in her first term. How many 'lone wolves' will be hiding among them?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Algeria was better off as a French colony than an independent nation, any Algerian will tell you that. It's why they begged to get their colonial status back.

Look what that got.

Now this Tunisian decides to kill the best thing about his heritage - his relationship to Western Civilization.

It's getting difficult to trust anyone who can't agree on the profound and fundamental importance of a civilization which has been through the Enlightenment, and one which has not. The philosophical underpinnings to even belonging in the 21st century apparently are missing.

Liberals base much of their political identity on protecting and promoting the rights of women. It is a complete mystery to me why they are not concerned about the fact that we are importing a culture that has disregard for the rights of women as a central tenet (and I say "culture," as we can have a discussion about whether that is based on Islam or tribal law -- but the fact remains). When I see women wearing headscarves and walking behind their husbands, it makes me sad. Many of these people have no intention of assimilating and adopting the western values of equality and freedom of speech and religion that we hold dear. I would have no problem with Muslims wearing scarves if men wore them, too. The whole practice is based upon the premise that a woman's sexuality must be hidden, and men can't be expected to control themselves. Do we really want to send the message to our daughters that repressing is ok if it's your "culture."

How exactly are we importing that?

And how exactly do you dictate to people what to wear and how to walk?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What about the weapons and grenades found in his truck? Maybe I'm simple - But is it easy to get grenades?

Who needs weapons and grenades when you have a truck and a large crowd?

He apparently thought he did b/c they found weapons and what not in his truck.

He had to get them from someone. As a peon myself, I have NO connections to anyone who can hook me up with grenades. So to say he wasn't connected to any group is probably not true.

Only there turned out to be no weapons on the truck. 2 handguns & a fake grenade. First news reports are usually not accurate & it ended up that the truck was not full of weapons.