Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Tons of couples DO want that baby to love and care for. TONS.

So a woman owes the results of an unwanted pregnancy to other people? So infertile people should have first dibs over another woman's bodily integrity?

How about giving a fetus a shot at a happy, meaningful life vs. sure death?

Exactly. How about practicing some non-violence and allowing the baby her life?

Terminating the life of a baby before birth is horrifically brutal. For mother AND child.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:
Tons of couples DO want that baby to love and care for. TONS.

So a woman owes the results of an unwanted pregnancy to other people? So infertile people should have first dibs over another woman's bodily integrity?

How about giving a fetus a shot at a happy, meaningful life vs. sure death?

Anonymous wrote:And I don't debate the terminology. Call it a baby if you want. An unwanted baby.

Terminology is legally important though. It's illegal to kill a baby for example. So to call an embryo or fetus a baby is insinuating abortions are illegal. The entire premise behind pro-life or pro-choice is based upon the terminology.

Anonymous wrote:
Tons of couples DO want that baby to love and care for. TONS.

So a woman owes the results of an unwanted pregnancy to other people? So infertile people should have first dibs over another woman's bodily integrity?

Anonymous wrote:
+1.

The left has tried for decades to remove any concept of responsibility or morality with sex. If you don't want to get pregnant, then don't have sex. If you choose to have sex and not use protection, you might make a baby. Be an adult and accept the responsibility for your action, not try to terminate the innocent life that was produced as a result of your actions.

-1

I know it feels good to put people in tidy little boxes, but most people, of all political stripes, have enjoyed premarital and/or non-procreational intercourse. And for a few decades, we've had reliable birth control. Many avail themselves of these options - again, from all political parties. And for many, having an abortion is acting responsibly. You disagree. FTR, have you heard the stories told by staff at abortion-providing clinics? Lots and lots of anti-choice protesters have abortions, then get back out harrassing women. So it seems that even anti-choice people is "irresponsible" and "immoral" with sex.

And I never understand why anti-choice people - who profess to love life! - basically see a baby as a punishment. It's gross.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

takoma wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Major snowstorm with potential blizzard conditions forecasted for Friday-Saturday.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2016/01/19/forecasts-converging-on-serious-friday-saturday-snowstorm/?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_cwg-1115am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

Sounds like God has spoken against the march

I checked the website http://marchforlife.org/mfl-2016/. It says "Despite the winter storm prediction, the March for Life will not be cancelled."

So there willing to endanger and possibly kill the already born?

They don't care once the baby is born.

How much time/energy/money do the spend supporting children at risk?

Which neighborhood are you in?

Me? I support a few local groups that help women/children. And I'm also 100% pro-choice.

How about these pro-lifers? How much time marching vs. time volunteering for live children?

How does abortion "help" the aborted child?

Saves them from a lifetime of being unwanted.

So how many hours a month do you volunteer to help needy living children?

What a disgusting post. I was born to an unwed mother in 1980, and spent most of my childhood at various relatives' houses, before aging out of the foster care system. No one wanted me, so I guess it just would have been better if I'd have been killed. How horrible.

I am pro-life and anti-death penalty for future reference. Also, I am pro-choice. The vast majority of people who have abortions made the choice to have sex. That was the choice of those people.

+1.

The left has tried for decades to remove any concept of responsibility or morality with sex. If you don't want to get pregnant, then don't have sex. If you choose to have sex and not use protection, you might make a baby. Be an adult and accept the responsibility for your action, not try to terminate the innocent life that was produced as a result of your actions.

Agree 100% but I still wouldn't prevent a woman from getting an abortion if she decides that is the best choice for her.

And I don't debate the terminology. Call it a baby if you want. An unwanted baby.

Tons of couples DO want that baby to love and care for. TONS.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every child a wanted child.

I guess you've adopted one or two of those Wednesday's children.

You do not know your history.

Oh that's great - how many kids have you adopted?

Please explain your response, otherwise it is a non-sequitur.

So you haven't adopted any children? Then STFU.

You do realize that 'every child a wanted child' is a PLanned Parenthood phrase, don't you?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every child a wanted child.

I guess you've adopted one or two of those Wednesday's children.

You do not know your history.

Oh that's great - how many kids have you adopted?

Please explain your response, otherwise it is a non-sequitur.

So you haven't adopted any children? Then STFU.

Why is there a requirement for adoption if one believes every child should be wanted? If every child is wanted, there would be no need for Wednesday's child.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

takoma wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Major snowstorm with potential blizzard conditions forecasted for Friday-Saturday.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2016/01/19/forecasts-converging-on-serious-friday-saturday-snowstorm/?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_cwg-1115am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

Sounds like God has spoken against the march

I checked the website http://marchforlife.org/mfl-2016/. It says "Despite the winter storm prediction, the March for Life will not be cancelled."

So there willing to endanger and possibly kill the already born?

They don't care once the baby is born.

How much time/energy/money do the spend supporting children at risk?

Which neighborhood are you in?

Me? I support a few local groups that help women/children. And I'm also 100% pro-choice.

How about these pro-lifers? How much time marching vs. time volunteering for live children?

How does abortion "help" the aborted child?

Saves them from a lifetime of being unwanted.

So how many hours a month do you volunteer to help needy living children?

What a disgusting post. I was born to an unwed mother in 1980, and spent most of my childhood at various relatives' houses, before aging out of the foster care system. No one wanted me, so I guess it just would have been better if I'd have been killed. How horrible.

I am pro-life and anti-death penalty for future reference. Also, I am pro-choice. The vast majority of people who have abortions made the choice to have sex. That was the choice of those people.

+1.

The left has tried for decades to remove any concept of responsibility or morality with sex. If you don't want to get pregnant, then don't have sex. If you choose to have sex and not use protection, you might make a baby. Be an adult and accept the responsibility for your action, not try to terminate the innocent life that was produced as a result of your actions.

Agree 100% but I still wouldn't prevent a woman from getting an abortion if she decides that is the best choice for her.

And I don't debate the terminology. Call it a baby if you want. An unwanted baby.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every child a wanted child.

I guess you've adopted one or two of those Wednesday's children.

You do not know your history.

Oh that's great - how many kids have you adopted?

Please explain your response, otherwise it is a non-sequitur.

So you haven't adopted any children? Then STFU.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

takoma wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Major snowstorm with potential blizzard conditions forecasted for Friday-Saturday.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/capital-weather-gang/wp/2016/01/19/forecasts-converging-on-serious-friday-saturday-snowstorm/?hpid=hp_rhp-top-table-main_cwg-1115am%3Ahomepage%2Fstory

Sounds like God has spoken against the march

I checked the website http://marchforlife.org/mfl-2016/. It says "Despite the winter storm prediction, the March for Life will not be cancelled."

So there willing to endanger and possibly kill the already born?

They don't care once the baby is born.

How much time/energy/money do the spend supporting children at risk?

Which neighborhood are you in?

Me? I support a few local groups that help women/children. And I'm also 100% pro-choice.

How about these pro-lifers? How much time marching vs. time volunteering for live children?

How does abortion "help" the aborted child?

Saves them from a lifetime of being unwanted.

So how many hours a month do you volunteer to help needy living children?

What a disgusting post. I was born to an unwed mother in 1980, and spent most of my childhood at various relatives' houses, before aging out of the foster care system. No one wanted me, so I guess it just would have been better if I'd have been killed. How horrible.

I am pro-life and anti-death penalty for future reference. Also, I am pro-choice. The vast majority of people who have abortions made the choice to have sex. That was the choice of those people.

+1.

The left has tried for decades to remove any concept of responsibility or morality with sex. If you don't want to get pregnant, then don't have sex. If you choose to have sex and not use protection, you might make a baby. Be an adult and accept the responsibility for your action, not try to terminate the innocent life that was produced as a result of your actions.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Every child a wanted child.

I guess you've adopted one or two of those Wednesday's children.

If every child is a wanted child there will be no Wednesday's children- they will all be with a family.

Anonymous wrote:So many couples are unable to conceive their own biological child, and are desperate to adopt a child of any race.

It's actually the opposite of what you say. There are many desperate children waiting to be adopted.
2014 statistics:

415,129 children in foster care
107,918 children waiting to be adopted

Source - http://www.acf.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/cb/afcarsreport22.pdf

Prolife and I have adopted one. I also support charities that help people raise their kids, for example diaper banks and educational charities. There is much more I could do, but it is a start.

Who wants children to live?
Every compassionate human being.