Anonymous wrote:I don't think it matters who she had sex with. If they were not exclusively dating, she can date as many people as she wants.
She can say to him that she would like to be exclusive with #1 if he is interested. If not, move on. I don't think anyone has the right to be annoyed unless they have already had the exclusive discussion.
Anonymous wrote:Alright OP now the question we all want answered: who is better in the sack guy 1 or guy 2?!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, kudos to you for putting yourself out there and being vulnerable, but keep your options open! He took for granted first that you were already exclusive and now he's doing it again. I agree with a PP, you shouldn't allow anyone to use you.
I'm sorry, how did he take for granted that they were exclusive? Did you read the whole thread? She said that she knew he assumed they were exclusive and she understood how he felt that way. She encouraged him to feel that way. I think what you meant to say was kudos to OP for manipulating another persons feelings.
Uh, no. If anything, I believe he assumed she was being monogamous and was riding the fence as well. So many women have been burned when making assumptions of exclusivity. OP, don't play that game with him. He should be "over" this quickly or he will string you along or punish you for the duration of the relationship (if there ever is one).
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For sure he did not like seeing me out with guy 2. He actually hated it.
As far as him using me like a couple of you said, well yeah, I thought about that. But you know I also thought even if he is, how is that really different than guy 2? With guy 2, it was all and only about sex. With Mr 1, it's now sex AND more. So I don't think it's fair to slam him because now we had sex. Does this make sense?
Is this the first time you had sex with #1? I'm having a hard time following.
Did #1 think you were exclusive but you weren't even sleeping with him?
Does that matter? We're "inventing" what determines exclusivity all of a sudden?
He inferred exclusivity by time spent (wrong on his part), but if you're asking if he slept with her and that's why he thought it, then guy #2 could have easily believed he had exclusivity with her, considering she kept coming back for more.
Seems like guy #1 is damned either way, according to DCUM.
Angry woman 1: Women are allowed to have casual sex.
Angry woman 2: Why would guy #1 think it's something more if he didn't sleep with her?
Angry woman 3: It's called taking your time and getting to know someone before sex. If he likes her, he'd respect that.
Seems like women will define sex to mean whatever they want it to mean during an argument.
Pick ONE argument at stick with it, if you're going to keep attacking guy 1's predicament in all this.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:OP, kudos to you for putting yourself out there and being vulnerable, but keep your options open! He took for granted first that you were already exclusive and now he's doing it again. I agree with a PP, you shouldn't allow anyone to use you.
I'm sorry, how did he take for granted that they were exclusive? Did you read the whole thread? She said that she knew he assumed they were exclusive and she understood how he felt that way. She encouraged him to feel that way. I think what you meant to say was kudos to OP for manipulating another persons feelings.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:For sure he did not like seeing me out with guy 2. He actually hated it.
As far as him using me like a couple of you said, well yeah, I thought about that. But you know I also thought even if he is, how is that really different than guy 2? With guy 2, it was all and only about sex. With Mr 1, it's now sex AND more. So I don't think it's fair to slam him because now we had sex. Does this make sense?
Is this the first time you had sex with #1? I'm having a hard time following.
Did #1 think you were exclusive but you weren't even sleeping with him?