Anonymous wrote:It also means your grandma at 80...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Baby at 41 means you are 60 when child graduates HS.
In DC all the moms in Pre-K are early 40's, every single last one. If you have a baby in your twenties in Washington its like WHAT were YOU thinking ?? What no masters degree , no law partnership….what a loser.
Inside the beltway teh average 60 year old looks like a 35 year old in Iowa, maybe better. LOL
Hardly. But they all tell themselves that and seem to actually believe that other people think they are younger than they are.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Baby at 41 means you are 60 when child graduates HS.
In DC all the moms in Pre-K are early 40's, every single last one. If you have a baby in your twenties in Washington its like WHAT were YOU thinking ?? What no masters degree , no law partnership….what a loser.
Inside the beltway teh average 60 year old looks like a 35 year old in Iowa, maybe better. LOL
Anonymous wrote:It would be for me. I'd also be way too nervous about all the possible birth defects.
Anonymous wrote:Baby at 41 means you are 60 when child graduates HS.
Anonymous wrote:Ever occur to you that your mom was deeply depressed and unhappy because she had her kids so late in life and at that time cut off from her friends and relatives whose kids were grown and out of the nest. Do you think she wanted to be at an Elementary school PTA meeting when she was 50 and your dad 55?Anonymous wrote:
Ever think your dear dad might have worked himself to death supporting you? Still with kids in high school at 65? Still paying for college in his late 60s? Sounds restful to me. No wonder he finally rested at age 73. Sounds like he just barely got you through college, assuming you did go to college. He had 5 years not supporting you! Dear old Dad and depressed old Mom!
No, age doesn't make a difference when all you think about is yourself.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I think it is way too old. You have a greater risk of having a Down Syndrome's baby. My dad was 42 when we were born. It was gross having an older dad than everyone else. Too, it is selfish. You won't be around for your grandkids. Why not adopt a child who needs parents and is already here?
The dumbest post ever
no - THIS is the dumbest post ever:
This seems to be the thread that never dies. If you get pregnant at 41 and the baby born at 42, it really, really helps to have excellent health. I think it works better if you are either rich or poor. If you are poor, you can always put the kid to work helping around the house and keeping you company as you age. Not so great for the kid, but oh well. If you are rich, someone else can do the heavy lifting. For a middle class person, saving for college and retirement at the same time can be difficult. Right now for someone in their 40s, college is looking like $1M, and retirement like $2M. That is a lot of saving.
funny!
Anonymous wrote:Had my first and only at 22 but I am now thinking about having my second at 41 .. I've always thought having a baby in your 40's was not a wise decision .. (to put it mildly) but now I find myself thinking about it and I NEVER wanted any more children .. I think it has a lot to do with the fact that I am now with someone that Im really in love with and that can change EVERYTHING .. Im really just pondering the idea
for right now but I need to hurry up and make a decision because Im not getting any younger! Everyone says I look 28 or 29 and I have Alot of energy and Im in pretty good shape but the fact remains Im STILL 41 so I have Alot to think about ...
Anonymous wrote:I think it is way too old. You have a greater risk of having a Down Syndrome's baby. My dad was 42 when we were born. It was gross having an older dad than everyone else. Too, it is selfish. You won't be around for your grandkids. Why not adopt a child who needs parents and is already here?
Anonymous wrote:Depends on your energy level. I'm 35 with 2 and I wouldn't want to have one in my 40s. Just make sure you know what you are signing up for and don't be offended if people ask if you are grandma.
When I was a teacher, I had teenagers whose parents were my age. (I had toddlers at the time.)
You also need to think about your age from the child's perspective. You will be about 62/63 when he/she is about 20. Providing he/she has kids later in life, you won't necessarily get to be a grandma. Just something to think about. My MIL only enjoyed her grandchild for a couple of years before she passed. My DH was her last child and he married late in life and became a Dad at 33.
Ever occur to you that your mom was deeply depressed and unhappy because she had her kids so late in life and at that time cut off from her friends and relatives whose kids were grown and out of the nest. Do you think she wanted to be at an Elementary school PTA meeting when she was 50 and your dad 55?Anonymous wrote: