Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am just chuckling at all the Vanilla crowd saying it's just smut. Um, maybe tune out from Bridgerton. Or are we only offended when the leads are gay?
FWIW, I think this and Bridgerton are exactly the same - a smutty romance targeted at a largely female audience with no deep meaning behind it despite trying to throw in a little for respectability (racial stuff for Bridgerton, homophobia issues for HR.)
Neither is much my thing but there is nothing wrong with them. But all the “it is so deep it might as well be the second coming of Shakespeare!” posts here and elsewhere crack me up. It’s not. You don’t need to justify with how intellectual and meaningful and this and that it is to allow yourself to enjoy it. It’s OK to like a trashy, romancy bit of fun and admit this is what that is.
To me, the books read like that, but not the show. It feels deeper and makes audiences emotionally invested because of the incredible acting and all the little details that were changed and added in the TV adaptation.
One of the characters struggles with a language barrier and the other is on the spectrum, so verbal communication is not their forte, but the viewer is able to discern their feelings of love, longing, worry, frustration, hope, hurt etc. because of how well the actors portray them with their micro expressions, body language, and choice of specific words and inflection in he dialogue. I forget that I am watching TV; it feels like I am intruding on someone’s private relationship.
Add to that the really hot sex scenes and fresh beautiful faces (and bodies, lol), and you get a global streaming phenomenon.
It's not a global streaming phenomenon because it's deep or particularly high quality. It's a show with good acting (not great dialogue for most of it) that was well done and deserves some praise. It's not more than that. To compare it to an earlier comment, it's not The Wire. It's not making it on any top 10 lists other than popularity right now until the next big thing comes along.
Anonymous wrote:People in Canada are going nuts for this show. Canadian NHL teams have started selling team jerseys with the characters' names on them.[/quote
I saw that! They are selling them for the same price as an actual hockey jersey with a players name ($250). Craziness.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am just chuckling at all the Vanilla crowd saying it's just smut. Um, maybe tune out from Bridgerton. Or are we only offended when the leads are gay?
FWIW, I think this and Bridgerton are exactly the same - a smutty romance targeted at a largely female audience with no deep meaning behind it despite trying to throw in a little for respectability (racial stuff for Bridgerton, homophobia issues for HR.)
Neither is much my thing but there is nothing wrong with them. But all the “it is so deep it might as well be the second coming of Shakespeare!” posts here and elsewhere crack me up. It’s not. You don’t need to justify with how intellectual and meaningful and this and that it is to allow yourself to enjoy it. It’s OK to like a trashy, romancy bit of fun and admit this is what that is.
To me, the books read like that, but not the show. It feels deeper and makes audiences emotionally invested because of the incredible acting and all the little details that were changed and added in the TV adaptation.
One of the characters struggles with a language barrier and the other is on the spectrum, so verbal communication is not their forte, but the viewer is able to discern their feelings of love, longing, worry, frustration, hope, hurt etc. because of how well the actors portray them with their micro expressions, body language, and choice of specific words and inflection in he dialogue. I forget that I am watching TV; it feels like I am intruding on someone’s private relationship.
Add to that the really hot sex scenes and fresh beautiful faces (and bodies, lol), and you get a global streaming phenomenon.
He is not on the spectrum! That is something the fans made up and then the actor rolled with it. The author siad that no, she didn't write him as autistic but she was fine with people understanding her characters in whatever way made sense to them.
They are good actors but people are insane in how deeply invested they have become in this show and the people involved. That level of investment is so unhealthy. I feel for the actors. Instead of being able to appreciate a successful work of art, they are needing to deal with insanity, their families nad partners getting death threats, and people over relating to them and not even realizing that the show is FICTION, it is FICTION. This isn't a love story between Connor and Hudson. I kind of despair for humanity when I read posts about this show. It is too bad people can't just appreciate it and enjoy it for what it is. Should just be a nice fun well acted fictional positive distraction from the mess of the world - but instead like everything people have to take it too far and turn it into something it isn't.
I wonder if the actors will even want to do a season 2. Realizing how insane people are and the many to distinguish between real life and fiction and seeing how doing this has harmed the people they care about in real life - it would be brave to go through with another season. Probably contractually obligated but it is a scary world - fanbase of this show included.
+1000
He is very much in tune with his parents' emotions (when they're discussing Wimbledon or something at the restaurant), he makes direct eye contact with just about everyone, etc. He is not autistic. He's a bit OCD and has anxiety, but those aren't the same things.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am just chuckling at all the Vanilla crowd saying it's just smut. Um, maybe tune out from Bridgerton. Or are we only offended when the leads are gay?
FWIW, I think this and Bridgerton are exactly the same - a smutty romance targeted at a largely female audience with no deep meaning behind it despite trying to throw in a little for respectability (racial stuff for Bridgerton, homophobia issues for HR.)
Neither is much my thing but there is nothing wrong with them. But all the “it is so deep it might as well be the second coming of Shakespeare!” posts here and elsewhere crack me up. It’s not. You don’t need to justify with how intellectual and meaningful and this and that it is to allow yourself to enjoy it. It’s OK to like a trashy, romancy bit of fun and admit this is what that is.
To me, the books read like that, but not the show. It feels deeper and makes audiences emotionally invested because of the incredible acting and all the little details that were changed and added in the TV adaptation.
One of the characters struggles with a language barrier and the other is on the spectrum, so verbal communication is not their forte, but the viewer is able to discern their feelings of love, longing, worry, frustration, hope, hurt etc. because of how well the actors portray them with their micro expressions, body language, and choice of specific words and inflection in he dialogue. I forget that I am watching TV; it feels like I am intruding on someone’s private relationship.
Add to that the really hot sex scenes and fresh beautiful faces (and bodies, lol), and you get a global streaming phenomenon.
He is not on the spectrum! That is something the fans made up and then the actor rolled with it. The author siad that no, she didn't write him as autistic but she was fine with people understanding her characters in whatever way made sense to them.
They are good actors but people are insane in how deeply invested they have become in this show and the people involved. That level of investment is so unhealthy. I feel for the actors. Instead of being able to appreciate a successful work of art, they are needing to deal with insanity, their families nad partners getting death threats, and people over relating to them and not even realizing that the show is FICTION, it is FICTION. This isn't a love story between Connor and Hudson. I kind of despair for humanity when I read posts about this show. It is too bad people can't just appreciate it and enjoy it for what it is. Should just be a nice fun well acted fictional positive distraction from the mess of the world - but instead like everything people have to take it too far and turn it into something it isn't.
I wonder if the actors will even want to do a season 2. Realizing how insane people are and the many to distinguish between real life and fiction and seeing how doing this has harmed the people they care about in real life - it would be brave to go through with another season. Probably contractually obligated but it is a scary world - fanbase of this show included.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I am just chuckling at all the Vanilla crowd saying it's just smut. Um, maybe tune out from Bridgerton. Or are we only offended when the leads are gay?
FWIW, I think this and Bridgerton are exactly the same - a smutty romance targeted at a largely female audience with no deep meaning behind it despite trying to throw in a little for respectability (racial stuff for Bridgerton, homophobia issues for HR.)
Neither is much my thing but there is nothing wrong with them. But all the “it is so deep it might as well be the second coming of Shakespeare!” posts here and elsewhere crack me up. It’s not. You don’t need to justify with how intellectual and meaningful and this and that it is to allow yourself to enjoy it. It’s OK to like a trashy, romancy bit of fun and admit this is what that is.
To me, the books read like that, but not the show. It feels deeper and makes audiences emotionally invested because of the incredible acting and all the little details that were changed and added in the TV adaptation.
One of the characters struggles with a language barrier and the other is on the spectrum, so verbal communication is not their forte, but the viewer is able to discern their feelings of love, longing, worry, frustration, hope, hurt etc. because of how well the actors portray them with their micro expressions, body language, and choice of specific words and inflection in he dialogue. I forget that I am watching TV; it feels like I am intruding on someone’s private relationship.
Add to that the really hot sex scenes and fresh beautiful faces (and bodies, lol), and you get a global streaming phenomenon.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The unbelievable acting and chemistry makes this show/story/love so addictive. I am re-watching it as we speak.
They have great chemistry indeed. They touch and kiss each other so sensually. I don't think I have ever seen kisses this beautiful and passionate in ANY show or film.
Yes! Their intimacy and all the touches - big and small - make the show. They’re so sensual and tactile that it’s ruined other onscreen couples for me (I am straight by the way).
Has it ruined your real life relationship as well?
No, though I do occasionally wake up with sadness in my heart because I am never going to be a hot, fit, young, millionaire Canadian hockey player in love with an even hotter, fitter Russian hockey player, relaxing at my gorgeous lakeside cottage and....multiple times a day.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The unbelievable acting and chemistry makes this show/story/love so addictive. I am re-watching it as we speak.
They have great chemistry indeed. They touch and kiss each other so sensually. I don't think I have ever seen kisses this beautiful and passionate in ANY show or film.
Yes! Their intimacy and all the touches - big and small - make the show. They’re so sensual and tactile that it’s ruined other onscreen couples for me (I am straight by the way).
Has it ruined your real life relationship as well?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a trivia tidbit. The actor who was the figure skating for the scene where Shane and his hosckey teammares watch the figure skating at the 2014 Olympics is a Canadian figure skater who won a silver medal at the 2014 Olympics!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/c50wVojJ3rI
He also breaks the sterotype of a male figure skater - not gay, and quite rugged.
Anotehr tidbit - Most of the actual hockey players were students from the University of Guelph - they put out a call for students who wanted to be extras in the show.
That skater, Dylan Moscovitch, is a pairs skater. The gay stereotype applies to male singles skaters, not pairs skaters. It’s funny how they made Dylan appear to be a singles skater when he wasn’t.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:As a trivia tidbit. The actor who was the figure skating for the scene where Shane and his hosckey teammares watch the figure skating at the 2014 Olympics is a Canadian figure skater who won a silver medal at the 2014 Olympics!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/c50wVojJ3rI
He also breaks the sterotype of a male figure skater - not gay, and quite rugged.
Anotehr tidbit - Most of the actual hockey players were students from the University of Guelph - they put out a call for students who wanted to be extras in the show.
That skater, Dylan Moscovitch, is a pairs skater. The gay stereotype applies to male singles skaters, not pairs skaters. It’s funny how they made Dylan appear to be a singles skater when he wasn’t.
Anonymous wrote:As a trivia tidbit. The actor who was the figure skating for the scene where Shane and his hosckey teammares watch the figure skating at the 2014 Olympics is a Canadian figure skater who won a silver medal at the 2014 Olympics!
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/c50wVojJ3rI
He also breaks the sterotype of a male figure skater - not gay, and quite rugged.
Anotehr tidbit - Most of the actual hockey players were students from the University of Guelph - they put out a call for students who wanted to be extras in the show.