Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:They are literally planning on deporting random Asian people to Africa for no reason. This policy does not make any sense.
Anonymous wrote:
It’s a deterrent against illegally migrating here for economic reasons and claiming you’re a refugee. If you were a refugee then you’d be happy in any safe country that wasn’t your own dangerous country that you’re leaving. Trump is calling their bluff. Australia does the same thing by the way, and has done so for decades. It dropped their “asylum seekers” numbers dramatically when they started doing refugee swaps and other programs like that. Basically Australia has a policy that if you come to Australia without proper documentation, you will never actually live in Australia - if you’re an economic migrant then you’ll be sent home and if you’re believed to be a refugee then you’ll be swapped for other refugees in a random other country. That’s how they keep the illegal immigration numbers down. It’s not worth it to make the journey through other safe countries to get to Australia when you won’t be able to stay there. We need to do exactly the same thing here.
Funny, how liberals don't think twice about having non-immigrants transplant to the US but scream about having them transplant somewhere else. Oh, no but their families la di da.
Funny how RWNJs like you support the offering of asylum to WHITES from South Africa who claim "racial discrimination" but don't recognize any other basis for asylum, especially when the person requesting asylum is black/brown.
Anonymous wrote:What about "non-immigrant". Thats a good round sounding term. That's whats stamped on the visas.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It’s just semantics. If you want us to say no human is illegal, that’s fine. But humans can be illegal immigrants, right? Humans can do illegal things, right?
If a human enters the US illegally, that’s a criminal action. Would you prefer we can them “criminals”. That would be accurate, no?
How about saying "undocumented" instead? When you get down to it the distinction is whether or not they have a birth certificate.
Anonymous wrote:Why is this basic message getting lost in the current news?