Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:The children don’t want to be with Brad bc of parental alienation. That’s why we don’t see Brad with the kids now.

The kids have heard years and years of Jolie bad mouthing Brad and painting herself as the victim. Their crazy, deranged “mother” purposefully ruined their relationship with their father because of her own mental issues and need to get revenge against Brad. She has used the legal system, the kids, and the winery in order to try to hurt Brad, because she’s a vengeful, angry woman who cannot move on.

Anonymous wrote:The children don’t want to be with Brad bc of parental alienation. That’s why we don’t see Brad with the kids now.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brad fought for custody for years. Angelina fought him every step of the way. A lot of mothers would be thrilled to have a father who wanted to be present in their children’s lives, but Angelina fought to alienate her children from their father. She didn’t want him to have any custody. She repeated the same behavior she saw from her mother - alienate her children from their father over her bitterness from the divorce. I also think she saw those children as hers, and once she was done with Brad, she didn’t want him in their lives. I think she’s a very controlling person who does not know how to co-parent or share. She should have stayed a single mom.

She also purposely sold her share of the winery to a business partner he had already turned down. She is the instigator of the years-long, acrimonious divorce. She first involved law enforcement in the divorce to attempt to get her ex-husband prosecuted. When that didn’t work, she refused to come to a mutually beneficial agreement regarding custody and the winery, leading to years-long bitter legal proceedings. Hurting her ex and “winning” seem to be more important to her than the well-being of her family. She is always putting out PR about wanting the family to “heal”, but her actions won’t let the family heal. It’s astounding that she acts as if she is a victim and blames everything on Brad, when it is her actions that have most damaged her family.

My BFF makes 50k and her ex has her in court seemingly every other week on custody. Amazing that Brad Putt can't afford to do that.

It’s possible that he thought that fighting that way would be worse do the kids. I don’t know what’s going on with them but I think it’s hard to be a divorcing parent of kids if the other parent’s main goal is to hurt you — fighting them just makes things worse for the kids. It’s why a lot of parents won’t contest custody even if their ex is a crappy parent.

Give me a break. The way some of you women cap for these no-good fathers is beyond disgusting. I guess that’s why so many women are duped because they continuously make excuses for the worse behavior in men. Brad Pitt has spent years fighting for a winery and has not given two shiits about how such a fight would impact his children’s psyche, but now he won’t spend half that effort and spend time with them because he was concerned how fighting would impact the same children. Pathetic.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

Money has nothing to do with anything. Yes, she can restrict his custody/visits/access through the courts or just hide the kids or refuse to let him see them. She constantly traveled and if he was working (and he had to work to support her lifestyle), he couldn't just drop everything and travel to her in hopes of seeing the kids for a few minutes. She kept them out out of school so there was no parents day, homecoming, etc and even so, yes, dads who don't have joint custody need an order if the school refuses as they go by what mom puts on the paperwork.

DP. You can’t be this naive. You don’t wonder why he found the strength to continue the winery lawsuit but gave up on taking her to court to custody? She can’t just hide the kids or restrict custody. If anything if he documented that behavior he would probably be able to use that to get some custody. You can’t even legally take a kid out if the country in this type of scenario without a signed consent letter from the other parent. He does not care and it isn’t a priority to him. I think some of the negative opinions of Angelina Jolie are accurate but it’s crazy to me how someone can pretend that Brad Pitt didn’t have the resources to try harder. If he wanted to he would.

Of course she can hide the kids. No court will do anything to mom.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brad fought for custody for years. Angelina fought him every step of the way. A lot of mothers would be thrilled to have a father who wanted to be present in their children’s lives, but Angelina fought to alienate her children from their father. She didn’t want him to have any custody. She repeated the same behavior she saw from her mother - alienate her children from their father over her bitterness from the divorce. I also think she saw those children as hers, and once she was done with Brad, she didn’t want him in their lives. I think she’s a very controlling person who does not know how to co-parent or share. She should have stayed a single mom.

She also purposely sold her share of the winery to a business partner he had already turned down. She is the instigator of the years-long, acrimonious divorce. She first involved law enforcement in the divorce to attempt to get her ex-husband prosecuted. When that didn’t work, she refused to come to a mutually beneficial agreement regarding custody and the winery, leading to years-long bitter legal proceedings. Hurting her ex and “winning” seem to be more important to her than the well-being of her family. She is always putting out PR about wanting the family to “heal”, but her actions won’t let the family heal. It’s astounding that she acts as if she is a victim and blames everything on Brad, when it is her actions that have most damaged her family.

My BFF makes 50k and her ex has her in court seemingly every other week on custody. Amazing that Brad Putt can't afford to do that.

She may have a free lawyer and not much he can do once the kids are alienated.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brad fought for custody for years. Angelina fought him every step of the way. A lot of mothers would be thrilled to have a father who wanted to be present in their children’s lives, but Angelina fought to alienate her children from their father. She didn’t want him to have any custody. She repeated the same behavior she saw from her mother - alienate her children from their father over her bitterness from the divorce. I also think she saw those children as hers, and once she was done with Brad, she didn’t want him in their lives. I think she’s a very controlling person who does not know how to co-parent or share. She should have stayed a single mom.

She also purposely sold her share of the winery to a business partner he had already turned down. She is the instigator of the years-long, acrimonious divorce. She first involved law enforcement in the divorce to attempt to get her ex-husband prosecuted. When that didn’t work, she refused to come to a mutually beneficial agreement regarding custody and the winery, leading to years-long bitter legal proceedings. Hurting her ex and “winning” seem to be more important to her than the well-being of her family. She is always putting out PR about wanting the family to “heal”, but her actions won’t let the family heal. It’s astounding that she acts as if she is a victim and blames everything on Brad, when it is her actions that have most damaged her family.

Doesn't matter. Plenty of people with contentious divorces still manage to see and be with their children, not to mention texts, emails, facetime, etc .

And who are you? How do you know some of these things didn’t or aren’t happening? Ffs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brad fought for custody for years. Angelina fought him every step of the way. A lot of mothers would be thrilled to have a father who wanted to be present in their children’s lives, but Angelina fought to alienate her children from their father. She didn’t want him to have any custody. She repeated the same behavior she saw from her mother - alienate her children from their father over her bitterness from the divorce. I also think she saw those children as hers, and once she was done with Brad, she didn’t want him in their lives. I think she’s a very controlling person who does not know how to co-parent or share. She should have stayed a single mom.

She also purposely sold her share of the winery to a business partner he had already turned down. She is the instigator of the years-long, acrimonious divorce. She first involved law enforcement in the divorce to attempt to get her ex-husband prosecuted. When that didn’t work, she refused to come to a mutually beneficial agreement regarding custody and the winery, leading to years-long bitter legal proceedings. Hurting her ex and “winning” seem to be more important to her than the well-being of her family. She is always putting out PR about wanting the family to “heal”, but her actions won’t let the family heal. It’s astounding that she acts as if she is a victim and blames everything on Brad, when it is her actions that have most damaged her family.

My BFF makes 50k and her ex has her in court seemingly every other week on custody. Amazing that Brad Putt can't afford to do that.

It’s possible that he thought that fighting that way would be worse do the kids. I don’t know what’s going on with them but I think it’s hard to be a divorcing parent of kids if the other parent’s main goal is to hurt you — fighting them just makes things worse for the kids. It’s why a lot of parents won’t contest custody even if their ex is a crappy parent.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

Money has nothing to do with anything. Yes, she can restrict his custody/visits/access through the courts or just hide the kids or refuse to let him see them. She constantly traveled and if he was working (and he had to work to support her lifestyle), he couldn't just drop everything and travel to her in hopes of seeing the kids for a few minutes. She kept them out out of school so there was no parents day, homecoming, etc and even so, yes, dads who don't have joint custody need an order if the school refuses as they go by what mom puts on the paperwork.

DP. You can’t be this naive. You don’t wonder why he found the strength to continue the winery lawsuit but gave up on taking her to court to custody? She can’t just hide the kids or restrict custody. If anything if he documented that behavior he would probably be able to use that to get some custody. You can’t even legally take a kid out if the country in this type of scenario without a signed consent letter from the other parent. He does not care and it isn’t a priority to him. I think some of the negative opinions of Angelina Jolie are accurate but it’s crazy to me how someone can pretend that Brad Pitt didn’t have the resources to try harder. If he wanted to he would.

Of course she can hide the kids. No court will do anything to mom.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

Money has nothing to do with anything. Yes, she can restrict his custody/visits/access through the courts or just hide the kids or refuse to let him see them. She constantly traveled and if he was working (and he had to work to support her lifestyle), he couldn't just drop everything and travel to her in hopes of seeing the kids for a few minutes. She kept them out out of school so there was no parents day, homecoming, etc and even so, yes, dads who don't have joint custody need an order if the school refuses as they go by what mom puts on the paperwork.

DP. You can’t be this naive. You don’t wonder why he found the strength to continue the winery lawsuit but gave up on taking her to court to custody? She can’t just hide the kids or restrict custody. If anything if he documented that behavior he would probably be able to use that to get some custody. You can’t even legally take a kid out if the country in this type of scenario without a signed consent letter from the other parent. He does not care and it isn’t a priority to him. I think some of the negative opinions of Angelina Jolie are accurate but it’s crazy to me how someone can pretend that Brad Pitt didn’t have the resources to try harder. If he wanted to he would.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brad fought for custody for years. Angelina fought him every step of the way. A lot of mothers would be thrilled to have a father who wanted to be present in their children’s lives, but Angelina fought to alienate her children from their father. She didn’t want him to have any custody. She repeated the same behavior she saw from her mother - alienate her children from their father over her bitterness from the divorce. I also think she saw those children as hers, and once she was done with Brad, she didn’t want him in their lives. I think she’s a very controlling person who does not know how to co-parent or share. She should have stayed a single mom.

She also purposely sold her share of the winery to a business partner he had already turned down. She is the instigator of the years-long, acrimonious divorce. She first involved law enforcement in the divorce to attempt to get her ex-husband prosecuted. When that didn’t work, she refused to come to a mutually beneficial agreement regarding custody and the winery, leading to years-long bitter legal proceedings. Hurting her ex and “winning” seem to be more important to her than the well-being of her family. She is always putting out PR about wanting the family to “heal”, but her actions won’t let the family heal. It’s astounding that she acts as if she is a victim and blames everything on Brad, when it is her actions that have most damaged her family.

My BFF makes 50k and her ex has her in court seemingly every other week on custody. Amazing that Brad Putt can't afford to do that.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brad fought for custody for years. Angelina fought him every step of the way. A lot of mothers would be thrilled to have a father who wanted to be present in their children’s lives, but Angelina fought to alienate her children from their father. She didn’t want him to have any custody. She repeated the same behavior she saw from her mother - alienate her children from their father over her bitterness from the divorce. I also think she saw those children as hers, and once she was done with Brad, she didn’t want him in their lives. I think she’s a very controlling person who does not know how to co-parent or share. She should have stayed a single mom.

She also purposely sold her share of the winery to a business partner he had already turned down. She is the instigator of the years-long, acrimonious divorce. She first involved law enforcement in the divorce to attempt to get her ex-husband prosecuted. When that didn’t work, she refused to come to a mutually beneficial agreement regarding custody and the winery, leading to years-long bitter legal proceedings. Hurting her ex and “winning” seem to be more important to her than the well-being of her family. She is always putting out PR about wanting the family to “heal”, but her actions won’t let the family heal. It’s astounding that she acts as if she is a victim and blames everything on Brad, when it is her actions that have most damaged her family.

Doesn't matter. Plenty of people with contentious divorces still manage to see and be with their children, not to mention texts, emails, facetime, etc .

And who are you? How do you know some of these things didn’t or aren’t happening? Ffs.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brad fought for custody for years. Angelina fought him every step of the way. A lot of mothers would be thrilled to have a father who wanted to be present in their children’s lives, but Angelina fought to alienate her children from their father. She didn’t want him to have any custody. She repeated the same behavior she saw from her mother - alienate her children from their father over her bitterness from the divorce. I also think she saw those children as hers, and once she was done with Brad, she didn’t want him in their lives. I think she’s a very controlling person who does not know how to co-parent or share. She should have stayed a single mom.

She also purposely sold her share of the winery to a business partner he had already turned down. She is the instigator of the years-long, acrimonious divorce. She first involved law enforcement in the divorce to attempt to get her ex-husband prosecuted. When that didn’t work, she refused to come to a mutually beneficial agreement regarding custody and the winery, leading to years-long bitter legal proceedings. Hurting her ex and “winning” seem to be more important to her than the well-being of her family. She is always putting out PR about wanting the family to “heal”, but her actions won’t let the family heal. It’s astounding that she acts as if she is a victim and blames everything on Brad, when it is her actions that have most damaged her family.

Doesn't matter. Plenty of people with contentious divorces still manage to see and be with their children, not to mention texts, emails, facetime, etc .

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:If you read past the headline, you’ll see they added all she’s received since they split in 2016: the $67 mil she got for the winery sale, $11 mil for a Churchill painting he gifted her which she sold at auction and so on. Not additional monies from the divorce settlement.

She came out of the marriage much richer than she entered it. And she made his life a living h*ll. The article is right she put him through the ringer by constantly trashing him in the press, keeping him away from his children, and selling his beloved winery to a business partner that she knew he didn’t want. She has some nerve playing the victim and acting as if she has been wronged. She has been on a never-ending mission to destroy her ex since she filed for divorce.

You are really a delusional fool, or you think others are. To think, a man with Pitt's financial, political, and public stature could not have access to his children. People with far, far less have shared custody and visiting and some of those people are undeniably no-shat parents and partners. Jolie could not legally keep him away from his children. In fact, he was granted access from the court, and he did Pitt did not follow through. It is truly disingenuous to blame the mother when the father does not show up for visitation rights. It was not Jolie's responsibility to get her children to Pitt. It was Pitt, the parent, to get to his children. He did not show up at this baby girl's Broadway production. All, he had to do was buy a ticket to the show. He has not appeared in Atlanta for his oldest daughter for any of her big days. He did not need Jolie's permission to go to parent's day, homecoming, high school graduation, etc. When he was supposed to be spending time with the twins, Brad chose to be in Europe to work on a film. Stop blaming mothers for the bad-behavior of deadbeat fathers.

We have no idea if he’s seen his kids. He doesn’t parade them around like Jolie. And we know some of his kids were at his beach house (I think celebrating grandma 80 bday) and his nieces took them back home when the week was over. Jolie served them lunch.

The kids didn’t go to their gma’s party. Jolie hosted the GMA and nieces at her house another day. One of the nieces commented on this

Not from what I saw in their IG storylines. And no way Jolie would host a party for GMA.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Brad fought for custody for years. Angelina fought him every step of the way. A lot of mothers would be thrilled to have a father who wanted to be present in their children’s lives, but Angelina fought to alienate her children from their father. She didn’t want him to have any custody. She repeated the same behavior she saw from her mother - alienate her children from their father over her bitterness from the divorce. I also think she saw those children as hers, and once she was done with Brad, she didn’t want him in their lives. I think she’s a very controlling person who does not know how to co-parent or share. She should have stayed a single mom.

She also purposely sold her share of the winery to a business partner he had already turned down. She is the instigator of the years-long, acrimonious divorce. She first involved law enforcement in the divorce to attempt to get her ex-husband prosecuted. When that didn’t work, she refused to come to a mutually beneficial agreement regarding custody and the winery, leading to years-long bitter legal proceedings. Hurting her ex and “winning” seem to be more important to her than the well-being of her family. She is always putting out PR about wanting the family to “heal”, but her actions won’t let the family heal. It’s astounding that she acts as if she is a victim and blames everything on Brad, when it is her actions that have most damaged her family.

My BFF makes 50k and her ex has her in court seemingly every other week on custody. Amazing that Brad Putt can't afford to do that.

It’s possible that he thought that fighting that way would be worse do the kids. I don’t know what’s going on with them but I think it’s hard to be a divorcing parent of kids if the other parent’s main goal is to hurt you — fighting them just makes things worse for the kids. It’s why a lot of parents won’t contest custody even if their ex is a crappy parent.