This level of arrogance is just astonishing from someone in a high position. They really have no clue of how toxic it is for the office when they use abuse their position.
What happened to the AP who was promoted? How does someone like her continue to even want to work there when people know how she got there and are disgusted by it?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Is AP pregnant? Her spouse should know then.
She's pregnant but apparently it's her husbands, not OPs dh.
They did a fetal paternity test? No hanky panky for a month? Or how apparently?
*shrug* ask OP. I still doubt the married hot 20-something is f***ing and/or pregnant by OPs old ass DH.
Some of you on this thread really have zero idea how a man in his 50s might be attractive to a woman in her 20s and you love making assumptions about what he looks like as well as assuming she's so "hot" she'd never have sex with someone older. You're actually pretty naive as well as prone to stereotyping. And you ignore the fact there might be some power dynamics at play here between them. You can only imagine that 20s equals hot and 50s equals "old ass" and unable to get it up.
LOL. Are you a 50-something trying to pretend you're still hot? Gross lol.
Give it a rest. OP called the 20-something hot. She did not call her 50+ DH hot.
That person wants to believe a 20-something hot woman is chasing a 50+yo old guy for his body. Unless you have $$$, no 20+yo woman is chasing your 50+yo a$$ for your looks. The average guy in his 50s, doesn't look like Clooney or Pitt when they were in their 50s. No 20-something woman is checking you out in your 50s (mid-40s, too), unless she has an idea regarding your checking account.
That person thinks you do not comprehend that hot bodies are not the only reason people screw. But an explanation of things like power dynamics between APs would be lost on you.
Anonymous wrote:Why would it destroy his career?
I can't imagine anyone caring about a colleague's workplace affair...
You would care plenty if the affair impacted (or appeared to impact) your career. I used to work for one of the Big Four accounting firms, and the national head of our specialty tax group was fired about four years ago because he had helped get his AP promoted.
The AP had not earned the promotion, and two of the people passed over so she could get promoted complained via our national ethics hotline. He (the national head of the group) was super sleazy and thought he was powerful enough to never get caught (even when HR came to him with proof of what he had done). It was awful and embarrassing for the firm and his office (Philadephia) since we had to tell clients he was "no longer with the Firm" after one day's notice that he was canned.
Why would it destroy his career?
I can't imagine anyone caring about a colleague's workplace affair...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:
Why would it destroy his career?
I can't imagine anyone caring about a colleague's workplace affair...
I cared about my colleagues’ affair and I got a promotion because the slut got one so why couldn’t I?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:"Won't someone please think of the homewreckers!?" --DCUM cheaters (or wannabe cheaters) thinking it's perfectly fine for OP's life to be destroyed, but don't dare hurt the people who were the destroyers.
The moment you cheat on your spouse, is the moment you forego any consideration by your spouse. The spouse who has been betrayed, gets to decide how they react, not some stranger whose own marriage is undoubtedly unhappy and you empathize w/ a cheater because you are one or want to be one.
OP, don't do anything before you really think about it, but ultimately, do what you think is best for you and your family.
I think people are thinking about the OW's husband. OP seems to be gleeful about wrecking that marriage without regard to the innocent people involved. I, for one, am not sure I'd want to know if my spouse were cheating.
The cheating whore had zero regard to the innocent wife and kids.
You seem to miss the point. The OW's husband is an innocent party here, and OP is getting her revenge at his expense. She is pretending that she's doing it in part to help him, but the reality is that she is doing it for spite and without regard to the OW's husband. That's selfish. It makes OP less sympathetic.
I disagree. There are a few people who say they wouldn't want to know their partner is cheating, but the vast majority seem to want to know. It's not getting revenge at his expense - it's giving him the option to liberate himself from a cheating whore who doesnt respect him or their marriage vows. It's not pretending to help him - it IS helping him. If he chooses to stay, he chooses with full knowledge of what shes done and capable of. He can adjust expectations accordingly. Keeping him in the dark only benefits the cheaters. Don't be a cheater and you dont have to worry about it.
100%
Cheating wives are often secretly plotting divorce for when kids go to college or lining things up for a hopeful exit affair. They are positioning themselves to get spouses $$, even meeting attornies and will use the “grew apart” while he is hit out of the blue and zero agency or knowledge she has been cheating. Some are even siphoning $ off.
It’s best they know.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:There is a better than 100% chance that this is the same OP of the “Husband and his partner” thread.
https://www.dcurbanmom.com/jforum/posts/list/1219915.page
If OP is also the OP of this thread, damn, the AP is pregnant. After OP outs the affair, I'd want to know whose baby it is, and I'd bet the AP's husband will want to know the same thing.
Anonymous wrote:Sleep with the AP's husband.
Anonymous wrote:
Why would it destroy his career?
I can't imagine anyone caring about a colleague's workplace affair...
You just assert that OW's husband should know, but you don't know that he wants to or needs to know. It's just what a selfish person says to justify hurting someone else for your own spiteful purposes. "The obvious" is that OP doesn't care about hurting someone else for her own pleasure -- ironically, just like the cheaters. You just want to suggest it is righteous by asserting, without any basis, that the husband wants to or "should" know.