Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Wasn't this the party of "F your feelings," or did I misremember that?

F your feelings
Snowflakes
Sheeple
Own the libs

Anonymous wrote:Wasn't this the party of "F your feelings," or did I misremember that?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Sorry, does the DNC really think something like this is going to resonate with normal people?

[twitter] https://x.com/joshraby/status/1815889888207892619?s=46&t=pauDPTlVqSRnQcIdMZswBw[/twitter]

Maybe democrats just need to talk about Kamala's record.

Ohhh... wait...

Right. They don’t want to elevate the debate to politics and the issues because they know they’ll lose. Americans aren’t going to fall for a candidate being “weird” from the candidate marketing herself as the “ brat”. It makes Kamala sound like she is in 7th grade and that’s what her maturity seems like so it fits.

They want to keep enjoying the fake news that they’re weird and bang couches. Meanwhile, their party allows you to be gender free or have no sexuality or have all of them all at once. That’s not weird though. Being non binary , vegan, pro Palestine, trans, BLM/defund the cops all at once is so not weird.

From what I can gather, it appears Jd Vance was a progressive /Democrat and like many millennials became conservative after the progressives went too far left regarding gender and kids. Lots of progressives left the Democrat party in the past 10 years and lots of millennials and white males too but the Dems haven’t realized they’re bleeding out members yet which is why their Vp shortlists are a struggle to get anyone young. Or maybe they have realized it and that’s why they want automatic citizenship for illegal aliens.

Anonymous wrote:The “weird” thing isn’t merely a talking point. It’s a visceral response to something that’s very, very off.

I suspect the GOP has no idea just how familiar the visceral “ick” is for women, and how attuned we are to the feeling. It’s not something that we get talked out of, either. It’s too palpable.

GOP, we’re trying to tell you: something’s really wrong with your guys.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at the right wing desperately trying to distract from Trump creeping on children and bragging about it.

Again, the issues are being discussed all over the political forum, but you only want to "TaLk AbOuT tHe IsSuEs" when we point out how f**king WEIRD these guys are. Go cry somewhere else, snowflakes. If hearing this is too uncomfortable look at who you support.

It's a little difficult to take your faux outrage seriously when the left has no issue with biological men walking freely around lockers rooms with women and sharing their restrooms.

One is abusing children, the other is using a fitting room. I can't take you seriously if you can't tell the difference. Also, why are you defending a guy who abused children? Do you have children? If this is normal in your house, get help, and maybe turn your kids over to a trusted family member.

Weirdo. It's WEIRD that you're brushing off a guy looking at kids undressing and bragging about it. It's WEIRD that you're making this into a trans issue. It's WEIRD that you're comparing a hypothetical to something that happened.

Therapy.

I think we know this is not a hypothetical. It happens far too often. And, the left endorses it.
Truth hurts, I know.

Trump lives it. He clearly has all the hallmarks of a pedo.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at the right wing desperately trying to distract from Trump creeping on children and bragging about it.

Again, the issues are being discussed all over the political forum, but you only want to "TaLk AbOuT tHe IsSuEs" when we point out how f**king WEIRD these guys are. Go cry somewhere else, snowflakes. If hearing this is too uncomfortable look at who you support.

It's a little difficult to take your faux outrage seriously when the left has no issue with biological men walking freely around lockers rooms with women and sharing their restrooms.

One is abusing children, the other is using a fitting room. I can't take you seriously if you can't tell the difference. Also, why are you defending a guy who abused children? Do you have children? If this is normal in your house, get help, and maybe turn your kids over to a trusted family member.

Weirdo. It's WEIRD that you're brushing off a guy looking at kids undressing and bragging about it. It's WEIRD that you're making this into a trans issue. It's WEIRD that you're comparing a hypothetical to something that happened.

Therapy.

I think we know this is not a hypothetical. It happens far too often. And, the left endorses it.
Truth hurts, I know.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Look at the right wing desperately trying to distract from Trump creeping on children and bragging about it.

Again, the issues are being discussed all over the political forum, but you only want to "TaLk AbOuT tHe IsSuEs" when we point out how f**king WEIRD these guys are. Go cry somewhere else, snowflakes. If hearing this is too uncomfortable look at who you support.

It's a little difficult to take your faux outrage seriously when the left has no issue with biological men walking freely around lockers rooms with women and sharing their restrooms.

One is abusing children, the other is using a fitting room. I can't take you seriously if you can't tell the difference. Also, why are you defending a guy who abused children? Do you have children? If this is normal in your house, get help, and maybe turn your kids over to a trusted family member.

Weirdo. It's WEIRD that you're brushing off a guy looking at kids undressing and bragging about it. It's WEIRD that you're making this into a trans issue. It's WEIRD that you're comparing a hypothetical to something that happened.

Therapy.

I think we know this is not a hypothetical. It happens far too often. And, the left endorses it.
Truth hurts, I know.

Anonymous wrote:I'm pretty sure this thread is supposed to be about how weird Vance and Trump are, right?

On a scale of 1 to 10, that will be charm quark hamburgers, Alex.

Anonymous wrote:Wasn't this the party of "F your feelings," or did I misremember that?

Anonymous wrote:You know, there's always the option of not being creepy. It's a choice. You could get out of your echo-chamber bubble and get deprogrammed from the absurdity that you've been living and promoting.

The problem isn't the naming of the "weird;" it's the weird itself.