Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op seems to be exaggerating a bit as Sidwell list looks good but definitely has schools outside T50.
Much of the impressive Sidwell list is hooked.
You have no firsthand knowledge to back up this claim. There’s no way in the world you know where all of their parents attended college. None…so stop it.
LinkedIn & the internet in general exist. You search the last name & “DC” and, say, Dartmouth alumni dinner attendance lists come up.
Complete BS. At least half of Sidwell’s posted Ivy admits have common surnames, are not URMs, and do not mention sports in the future college plans. There’s zero chance that you can be certain that Sidwell student, “John Robinson,” (fictional name) is a Brown University legacy. There are simply too many Robinsons in DC. Further, John Robinson’s parents may actually live and work in Maryland or Virginia.
As a Sidwell insider, you can be quite certain, however.
You’re a Sidwell insider who has to use LinkedIn and internet searches to find parental information? Mmmkay.
Once again, complete and utter BS. Sidwell doesn’t ask about parents’ education background on admissions applications. The only way that administrators, teachers, other students, and you would know the parents’ colleges is if they ask the students. You DID not ask all of the aforementioned students for that information.
Now, get off Al Gore’s internet and go do something productive with your Sunday.
What?? You do realize that parents talk to each other, right? And aren't necessarily secretive about their backgrounds?
Np. Sidwell asks about parents’ educations and work profiles on applications (standard for private schools) and I frequently Google search the parents of the kids who I go to school with…Why not? If someone mentions that all their siblings went to Georgetown or something like that I’ll Google to see if their family donated a building (this actually happened and their family did donate a building).
My rising 9th grader applied/was accepted to Sidwell this past March. There are exactly zero questions on Sidwell’s application that ask where the applicant’s parents attended school. ZERO
You have not even joined the school and you are yapping like some expert.
In 11th and 12th grade, the college counselors ask for this information blatantly.
Unlike you I have strong reading comprehension skills. I replied to the post that stated that Sidwell asks about APPLICANTS’ parents college attendance on the admissions application. That statement is blatantly and demonstrably false. Period.
I'm not the PP - but I am pretty sure our application asked these details but that was pre-COVID
Anonymous wrote:The title of this post is BS. GDS parent here and GDS had a bad year. No going to lie or sugar coat it- last year was stellar, this year is not anywhere near that in terms of ivy league and top 15 schools. Lackluster overall. Of course the school's party line is that this was a "weak class" which is not true. Maybe less connected than last year i.e. no Supreme Court Justice's kids... but not weak. I know for a fact Sidwell and St Albans also had worse years than in the past despite the boosterism in these posts.
I think GDS's arrogance (and this goes for the other Big 3's as well) in thinking that all the colleges "know how hard GDS is" is coming home to roost. Nope. They don't know and don't care that many GDS teachers don't give A's. And our kids are seeing the impact. Case in point: Kids with 36 and 35 ACT or 1570 SAT's with high (for GDS) GPA's in the most rigorous classes (we don't have AP's anymore) are getting shut out at schools they would have gotten into 5 years ago. It's a new world, and GDS needs to keep up with the competition- which in part, is public school kids with 5.0 weighted GPA's. I'm not knocking the public schools or even saying the grade inflation is a bad thing, it's just that colleges are not comparing apples with apples when it comes to rigor. GDS kids are not getting credit for how ridiculously hard the classes are. And frankly, yes, I'm happy my kid will be well prepared but getting into a good college that is a good match for them is ALSO part of the equation of sending your kid to private. At this point I actually feel being in a private is a negative when it comes to the admissions game. Whether or not it will be a positive as my kid moves through life, who knows.
Anonymous wrote:To Maret and GDS parents above - setting admissions aside - are your kids glad they attended Maret/GDS? Did they enjoy the experience, teachers, classmates? I know it was tricky because of COVID (especially those who started in 9th) - so I understand that there is also that factor.
This is a genuine question - trying to determine HS placement in next few years for our younger children - already familiar with Sidwell/STA-NCS.
Anonymous wrote:The title of this post is BS. GDS parent here and GDS had a bad year. No going to lie or sugar coat it- last year was stellar, this year is not anywhere near that in terms of ivy league and top 15 schools. Lackluster overall. Of course the school's party line is that this was a "weak class" which is not true. Maybe less connected than last year i.e. no Supreme Court Justice's kids... but not weak. I know for a fact Sidwell and St Albans also had worse years than in the past despite the boosterism in these posts.
I think GDS's arrogance (and this goes for the other Big 3's as well) in thinking that all the colleges "know how hard GDS is" is coming home to roost. Nope. They don't know and don't care that many GDS teachers don't give A's. And our kids are seeing the impact. Case in point: Kids with 36 and 35 ACT or 1570 SAT's with high (for GDS) GPA's in the most rigorous classes (we don't have AP's anymore) are getting shut out at schools they would have gotten into 5 years ago. It's a new world, and GDS needs to keep up with the competition- which in part, is public school kids with 5.0 weighted GPA's. I'm not knocking the public schools or even saying the grade inflation is a bad thing, it's just that colleges are not comparing apples with apples when it comes to rigor. GDS kids are not getting credit for how ridiculously hard the classes are. And frankly, yes, I'm happy my kid will be well prepared but getting into a good college that is a good match for them is ALSO part of the equation of sending your kid to private. At this point I actually feel being in a private is a negative when it comes to the admissions game. Whether or not it will be a positive as my kid moves through life, who knows.
Anonymous wrote:The title of this post is BS. GDS parent here and GDS had a bad year. No going to lie or sugar coat it- last year was stellar, this year is not anywhere near that in terms of ivy league and top 15 schools. Lackluster overall. Of course the school's party line is that this was a "weak class" which is not true. Maybe less connected than last year i.e. no Supreme Court Justice's kids... but not weak. I know for a fact Sidwell and St Albans also had worse years than in the past despite the boosterism in these posts.
I think GDS's arrogance (and this goes for the other Big 3's as well) in thinking that all the colleges "know how hard GDS is" is coming home to roost. Nope. They don't know and don't care that many GDS teachers don't give A's. And our kids are seeing the impact. Case in point: Kids with 36 and 35 ACT or 1570 SAT's with high (for GDS) GPA's in the most rigorous classes (we don't have AP's anymore) are getting shut out at schools they would have gotten into 5 years ago. It's a new world, and GDS needs to keep up with the competition- which in part, is public school kids with 5.0 weighted GPA's. I'm not knocking the public schools or even saying the grade inflation is a bad thing, it's just that colleges are not comparing apples with apples when it comes to rigor. GDS kids are not getting credit for how ridiculously hard the classes are. And frankly, yes, I'm happy my kid will be well prepared but getting into a good college that is a good match for them is ALSO part of the equation of sending your kid to private. At this point I actually feel being in a private is a negative when it comes to the admissions game. Whether or not it will be a positive as my kid moves through life, who knows.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Op seems to be exaggerating a bit as Sidwell list looks good but definitely has schools outside T50.
Much of the impressive Sidwell list is hooked.
You have no firsthand knowledge to back up this claim. There’s no way in the world you know where all of their parents attended college. None…so stop it.
LinkedIn & the internet in general exist. You search the last name & “DC” and, say, Dartmouth alumni dinner attendance lists come up.
Complete BS. At least half of Sidwell’s posted Ivy admits have common surnames, are not URMs, and do not mention sports in the future college plans. There’s zero chance that you can be certain that Sidwell student, “John Robinson,” (fictional name) is a Brown University legacy. There are simply too many Robinsons in DC. Further, John Robinson’s parents may actually live and work in Maryland or Virginia.
As a Sidwell insider, you can be quite certain, however.
You’re a Sidwell insider who has to use LinkedIn and internet searches to find parental information? Mmmkay.
Once again, complete and utter BS. Sidwell doesn’t ask about parents’ education background on admissions applications. The only way that administrators, teachers, other students, and you would know the parents’ colleges is if they ask the students. You DID not ask all of the aforementioned students for that information.
Now, get off Al Gore’s internet and go do something productive with your Sunday.
What?? You do realize that parents talk to each other, right? And aren't necessarily secretive about their backgrounds?
Np. Sidwell asks about parents’ educations and work profiles on applications (standard for private schools) and I frequently Google search the parents of the kids who I go to school with…Why not? If someone mentions that all their siblings went to Georgetown or something like that I’ll Google to see if their family donated a building (this actually happened and their family did donate a building).
My rising 9th grader applied/was accepted to Sidwell this past March. There are exactly zero questions on Sidwell’s application that ask where the applicant’s parents attended school. ZERO
You have not even joined the school and you are yapping like some expert.
In 11th and 12th grade, the college counselors ask for this information blatantly.
Unlike you I have string reading comprehension skills. I replied to the post that stated that Sidwell asks about APPLICANTS’ parents college attendance on the admissions application. That statement is blatantly and demonstrably false. Period.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My daughter is at NCS.
From what I can tell:
20% Ivies
10% U of Chicago
10% other top 20 universities
10% top 10 liberal arts colleges
Etc.
That is 50% of the class into TOP20 colleges/universities. Minimum.
Even with the deflated GPAs (well under 4.0), almost no APs, etc.
STA is similar.
Sidwell has pretty much gotten the entire class in top50 schools.
GDS is a bit uneven.
Am I the only one that actually thinks the %age going to top 20 schools should be much higher than 50%?
Curious if anyone knows the %age from 10 or 20 years ago.
No. Why should going to a freaking $50,000/year private high school entitle you to go to a top 20 school?
You are missing the point…OP is bragging that the school did so well with top 20 admissions…I thought they were going to say 80%+ were accepted Top 20…50% is fine, but I bet it was much higher in previous years.
Not pp but I don’t think t20 colleges are accepting 50% of a particular high school’s class anymore. The admissions landscape & priorities have changed dramatically over the past 10-20 years.
Yeah, but we are only talking about 40 kids. Remove U Chicago and it is 36 kids at 19 colleges. NCS and STA have done a great job tightening the relationship with U Chicago.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My daughter is at NCS.
From what I can tell:
20% Ivies
10% U of Chicago
10% other top 20 universities
10% top 10 liberal arts colleges
Etc.
That is 50% of the class into TOP20 colleges/universities. Minimum.
Even with the deflated GPAs (well under 4.0), almost no APs, etc.
STA is similar.
Sidwell has pretty much gotten the entire class in top50 schools.
GDS is a bit uneven.
Am I the only one that actually thinks the %age going to top 20 schools should be much higher than 50%?
Curious if anyone knows the %age from 10 or 20 years ago.
No. Why should going to a freaking $50,000/year private high school entitle you to go to a top 20 school?
You are missing the point…OP is bragging that the school did so well with top 20 admissions…I thought they were going to say 80%+ were accepted Top 20…50% is fine, but I bet it was much higher in previous years.
Not pp but I don’t think t20 colleges are accepting 50% of a particular high school’s class anymore. The admissions landscape & priorities have changed dramatically over the past 10-20 years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My daughter is at NCS.
From what I can tell:
20% Ivies
10% U of Chicago
10% other top 20 universities
10% top 10 liberal arts colleges
Etc.
That is 50% of the class into TOP20 colleges/universities. Minimum.
Even with the deflated GPAs (well under 4.0), almost no APs, etc.
STA is similar.
Sidwell has pretty much gotten the entire class in top50 schools.
GDS is a bit uneven.
Am I the only one that actually thinks the %age going to top 20 schools should be much higher than 50%?
Curious if anyone knows the %age from 10 or 20 years ago.
No. Why should going to a freaking $50,000/year private high school entitle you to go to a top 20 school?
You are missing the point…OP is bragging that the school did so well with top 20 admissions…I thought they were going to say 80%+ were accepted Top 20…50% is fine, but I bet it was much higher in previous years.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My daughter is at NCS.
From what I can tell:
20% Ivies
10% U of Chicago
10% other top 20 universities
10% top 10 liberal arts colleges
Etc.
That is 50% of the class into TOP20 colleges/universities. Minimum.
Even with the deflated GPAs (well under 4.0), almost no APs, etc.
STA is similar.
Sidwell has pretty much gotten the entire class in top50 schools.
GDS is a bit uneven.
Am I the only one that actually thinks the %age going to top 20 schools should be much higher than 50%?
Curious if anyone knows the %age from 10 or 20 years ago.
No. Why should going to a freaking $50,000/year private high school entitle you to go to a top 20 school?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:My daughter is at NCS.
From what I can tell:
20% Ivies
10% U of Chicago
10% other top 20 universities
10% top 10 liberal arts colleges
Etc.
That is 50% of the class into TOP20 colleges/universities. Minimum.
Even with the deflated GPAs (well under 4.0), almost no APs, etc.
STA is similar.
Sidwell has pretty much gotten the entire class in top50 schools.
GDS is a bit uneven.
Am I the only one that actually thinks the %age going to top 20 schools should be much higher than 50%?
Curious if anyone knows the %age from 10 or 20 years ago.