Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are collectively Sh_tting their pants at the thought of a young hungry Vivek absolutely eviscerating Biden.

I mean, it would be so bad for the Dems if Biden had to debate an opponent over 40 years younger than him who is a way wayyyyyyy better public speaker with more intelligence. The dems would have to call in the police for elderly abuse. Vivek would absolutely obliterate Biden on stage.

Who writes and thinks like this? This reads like it was written be a meathead moron keyboard warrior. It's a bunch of macho crap that may work for the insecure male, but it's laughable.

One thing people don't like to admit with Trump is that his macho bullying and posturing worked because he's white. He also has no class. He didn't have to fake that and it's one thing that actually resonated with poor whites and aggrieved whites. Considering the aggrieved whites will see the kid that went to TJ instead of their kid and the poor whites won't identify with Ramaswamy at all, I don't think he has a shot.

Wow, I think you win progressive bingo in a single post! In only a few words, you were able to include "whites", "males", "aggrieved whites", and insecurity... I'm so woke now I don't even need a triple espresso to make up this morning.

Loooove to see Vivek vs Joey. An 85 year old senile bat getting abused in a debate by a 38 year old in his prime who is max lucid and quick witted with a razor tongue. They'd have to hide Biden from the embarrassment.

Biden may be senile and embarrassing at times but he'd destroy Vivek in an election

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slick indeed.

Tech bros with no political experience have not been vetted as intensely as politicians. As his past is scrutinized, there will be suggestions of self-dealing, insider trading, fraud, etc. because that’s how fortunes are made.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Maybe not a simple-minded fool, but a grifter targeting simple-minded fools. There is a big market for these dumbed-down greed, anger, and delusion narratives.

News flash...the vast majority of voters, regardless of party, are simple-minded fools that can't really be bothered with detailed Liz Warren style proposals. Targeting them is called campaigning. It isn't a dissertation defense.

He is saying stupid things. Very stupid things showing no understanding of any policy issues.

What stupid things? You know how many very stupid things were said on the campaign trail by both major-party candidates in 2020?

Not even sure what you're referring to, but he's not running to be Chief Policy Advisor of the U.S. You hire that crap out. He's running for President. All he needs right now is to set the tone, to hit on themes that resonate with people and traction to get on the debate state. He's trying to appeal to values and common sense, in a way that resonates. Leave the wonkery to DC types he can eventually hire if he gets enough traction to put a cute little "issues" page on his website and policy proposals that you can have fun eviscerating.

This dude is not a politician; not even sure he actually wants to be President. His campaign is in startup mode right now and things can look a little funky in the beginning stages of a startup, especially for an outsider without a name brand. Andrew Yang became relevant by 4 chan memes, random podcasts and some twitter exuberance. Vivek needs to find a similar path, because I don't think he's rich enough to just bankroll the whole thing like a Tom Steyer. He's already a little ahead in that regard, because Fox and others have been giving him airtime, but I don't think he has as fervent a fanbase as Yang did. Right now, he's just trying to get to the next milestone, for now more attention and visibility; eventually getting on debate stages.

Anyone claiming that eliminating the Department of Education is a solution for anything is not a serious person. The President is head of the government. This narcissist knows nothing about government. He’s just a literate version of MTG. None of his points are even original. It’s the same stupid shit that the dumbest Republican have been saying for 40 years.

PP here and THANK YOU. 100% spot on. I am not impressed by Harvard or Yale anymore. Nor am I impressed that someone made a lot of money in startups or tech. I am interested in someone that wants to get things done for the US and the American people in a reality-based manner. And that's not what Ramaswamy is interested in.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is just insane.

This is what happens to ANY Republican who rises in the ranks.... the media attacks. In desperate ways.

[…]

Republicans are getting dumber. I’m not sure how that’s even possible, but it’s the truth.

I don't know.
I think the dumb ones are the ones on the left who call someone a "neo-Nazi" for stating that his parents came to the US legally and did well.

Anonymous wrote:Ramaswamy is insincere and an outright liar, I am amazed at the people who are impressed by him. His snake oil sales charm is so visible.

Anonymous wrote:He’s annoying and comes off like the guy who thinks he’s smarter than everyone else in the room and won’t stop telling you that, even when he doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slick indeed.

Tech bros with no political experience have not been vetted as intensely as politicians. As his past is scrutinized, there will be suggestions of self-dealing, insider trading, fraud, etc. because that’s how fortunes are made.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slick indeed.

Tech bros with no political experience have not been vetted as intensely as politicians. As his past is scrutinized, there will be suggestions of self-dealing, insider trading, fraud, etc. because that’s how fortunes are made.

FIFY

Tech bros with no political experience have not been vetted as intensely as other Republican politicians. As his past is scrutinized, there will be false accusations of self-dealing, insider trading, fraud, etc. because that’s how the MSM will treat any Republican running for office.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are collectively Sh_tting their pants at the thought of a young hungry Vivek absolutely eviscerating Biden.

I mean, it would be so bad for the Dems if Biden had to debate an opponent over 40 years younger than him who is a way wayyyyyyy better public speaker with more intelligence. The dems would have to call in the police for elderly abuse. Vivek would absolutely obliterate Biden on stage.

Who writes and thinks like this? This reads like it was written be a meathead moron keyboard warrior. It's a bunch of macho crap that may work for the insecure male, but it's laughable.

One thing people don't like to admit with Trump is that his macho bullying and posturing worked because he's white. He also has no class. He didn't have to fake that and it's one thing that actually resonated with poor whites and aggrieved whites. Considering the aggrieved whites will see the kid that went to TJ instead of their kid and the poor whites won't identify with Ramaswamy at all, I don't think he has a shot.

Wow, I think you win progressive bingo in a single post! In only a few words, you were able to include "whites", "males", "aggrieved whites", and insecurity... I'm so woke now I don't even need a triple espresso to make up this morning.

Loooove to see Vivek vs Joey. An 85 year old senile bat getting abused in a debate by a 38 year old in his prime who is max lucid and quick witted with a razor tongue. They'd have to hide Biden from the embarrassment.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Slick indeed.

Tech bros with no political experience have not been vetted as intensely as politicians. As his past is scrutinized, there will be suggestions of self-dealing, insider trading, fraud, etc. because that’s how fortunes are made.

Anonymous wrote:Slick indeed.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Democrats are collectively Sh_tting their pants at the thought of a young hungry Vivek absolutely eviscerating Biden.

I mean, it would be so bad for the Dems if Biden had to debate an opponent over 40 years younger than him who is a way wayyyyyyy better public speaker with more intelligence. The dems would have to call in the police for elderly abuse. Vivek would absolutely obliterate Biden on stage.

Who writes and thinks like this? This reads like it was written be a meathead moron keyboard warrior. It's a bunch of macho crap that may work for the insecure male, but it's laughable.

One thing people don't like to admit with Trump is that his macho bullying and posturing worked because he's white. He also has no class. He didn't have to fake that and it's one thing that actually resonated with poor whites and aggrieved whites. Considering the aggrieved whites will see the kid that went to TJ instead of their kid and the poor whites won't identify with Ramaswamy at all, I don't think he has a shot.

Wow, I think you win progressive bingo in a single post! In only a few words, you were able to include "whites", "males", "aggrieved whites", and insecurity... I'm so woke now I don't even need a triple espresso to make up this morning.

Loooove to see Vivek vs Joey. An 85 year old senile bat getting abused in a debate by a 38 year old in his prime who is max lucid and quick witted with a razor tongue. They'd have to hide Biden from the embarrassment.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This is just insane.

This is what happens to ANY Republican who rises in the ranks.... the media attacks. In desperate ways.

[…]

Republicans are getting dumber. I’m not sure how that’s even possible, but it’s the truth.

I don't know.
I think the dumb ones are the ones on the left who call someone a "neo-Nazi" for stating that his parents came to the US legally and did well.

Anonymous wrote:Serious countries don’t elect someone with zero political experience to be president. Oh wait….