Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let the child be American. Not some ridiculous refugee.
They cannot. This is a violation of International law. The US court system cannot support what is essentially an egregious case of child trafficking. The Masts kidnapped the child and brought the child across international borders. There is no legitimate legal claim by the Masts that would allow them to keep the child. If the court system does not void the adoption, this will be terrible for the US internationally.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:jAnonymous wrote:The child is five now. Likely some shared custody might be in the best interest of the child. For the sake of the child, being ripped away from your family to stay with people you don't know at 5 would be quite traumatic.
You can’t just go around stealing other people’s babies.
The Mast's adoption, guardianship, and custody have all been voided now. She will go to her family in Texas, after the hearing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The child is five now. Likely some shared custody might be in the best interest of the child. For the sake of the child, being ripped away from your family to stay with people you don't know at 5 would be quite traumatic.
Living in a child-stealing family would be traumatic. Leaving them to live with her family is in her best interests.
Anonymous wrote:Let the child be American. Not some ridiculous refugee.
Anonymous wrote:jAnonymous wrote:The child is five now. Likely some shared custody might be in the best interest of the child. For the sake of the child, being ripped away from your family to stay with people you don't know at 5 would be quite traumatic.
You can’t just go around stealing other people’s babies.
Anonymous wrote:Update: an appellate court has ruled that a U.S. Marine should never have been granted an adoption of an Afghan war orphan and voided the custody order he’s relied on to raise the girl for nearly three years.
https://wset.com/news/local/court-rules-against-virginia-marines-adoption-of-afghan-orphan-separated-from-her-family-joshua-mast-fluvanna-county-central-virginia-taliban-war-july-2024
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The child is five now. Likely some shared custody might be in the best interest of the child. For the sake of the child, being ripped away from your family to stay with people you don't know at 5 would be quite traumatic.
That was the Masts goal in delaying the case and keeping her this long, so it would be rewarding them.
At the end of the day rewarding or punishing the adults should be secondary to limiting the trauma to the child. Ripping a five year old away from the only family they have known would be horrible for the child and would likely have long lasting impacts.
Anonymous wrote:Let the child be American. Not some ridiculous refugee.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The child is five now. Likely some shared custody might be in the best interest of the child. For the sake of the child, being ripped away from your family to stay with people you don't know at 5 would be quite traumatic.
That was the Masts goal in delaying the case and keeping her this long, so it would be rewarding them.
At the end of the day rewarding or punishing the adults should be secondary to limiting the trauma to the child. Ripping a five year old away from the only family they have known would be horrible for the child and would likely have long lasting impacts.
jAnonymous wrote:The child is five now. Likely some shared custody might be in the best interest of the child. For the sake of the child, being ripped away from your family to stay with people you don't know at 5 would be quite traumatic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The child is five now. Likely some shared custody might be in the best interest of the child. For the sake of the child, being ripped away from your family to stay with people you don't know at 5 would be quite traumatic.
That was the Masts goal in delaying the case and keeping her this long, so it would be rewarding them.
At the end of the day rewarding or punishing the adults should be secondary to limiting the trauma to the child. Ripping a five year old away from the only family they have known would be horrible for the child and would likely have long lasting impacts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:The child is five now. Likely some shared custody might be in the best interest of the child. For the sake of the child, being ripped away from your family to stay with people you don't know at 5 would be quite traumatic.
That was the Masts goal in delaying the case and keeping her this long, so it would be rewarding them.
At the end of the day rewarding or punishing the adults should be secondary to limiting the trauma to the child. Ripping a five year old away from the only family they have known would be horrible for the child and would likely have long lasting impacts.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Let the child be American. Not some ridiculous refugee.
This is not our call to make. She is Afghani, with living Afghani relatives who want to raise her. We can't just keep her here because 'we're better."