Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope the Democrats know what they are doing here. For every action there is a reaction. To go after Trump like the way they are doing. It’s going to bite the current admin come next year. Just saying. 🌈

"democrats" aren't doing this. Law Enforcement, however, is.

Law is blind to anything but facts uncovering crimes.

Can you call Fox News and info wars and relay that on a call in show? Because the media that trump fans consume doesn’t include that type of information.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fact:

What does this have to do with anything?

Does the law suddenly not apply to Donnie just because, at some later date, he might announce he is running for president?

I don't recall Republicans complaining that HRC was under investigation when she was running for president or that Bill Clinton was under investigation when he was in the White House.

Her home was never searched and it should have been because she had a “private server” at her home holding public records. But they didn’t. This is absolutely politically motivated. Garland has weaponized the justice department to a degree not seen since Hoover. Well done.

Because she turned over an image of the entire server. It's been over 18 months and he was still intentionally not complying. That's a huge distinction.

Another distinction is that the classified documents she was deemed to have had were retroactively classified as secret and could be counted on one hand. He had hundreds of documents that were code word classified at the time he took them. That's three more huge distinctions.

Putting this together with the fact that the DOJ Chief of Counterintelligence and Export Control visited Mar-A-Lago in June leads one to believe that they're looking at more than violations of the Presidential Records Act.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fact:

What does this have to do with anything?

Does the law suddenly not apply to Donnie just because, at some later date, he might announce he is running for president?

I don't recall Republicans complaining that HRC was under investigation when she was running for president or that Bill Clinton was under investigation when he was in the White House.

Her home was never searched and it should have been because she had a “private server” at her home holding public records. But they didn’t. This is absolutely politically motivated. Garland has weaponized the justice department to a degree not seen since Hoover. Well done.

Find new sources of information. The ones you are using have put you on earth prime. Please come back to earth. Your family misses you.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I hope the Democrats know what they are doing here. For every action there is a reaction. To go after Trump like the way they are doing. It’s going to bite the current admin come next year. Just saying. 🌈

I hope Trump knew what he was doing when he took boxes of classified documents home. For every action there is a reaction. To break the law like he did, it's going to bite him.

It really is some amazing mental ju jitsu that they think Trump's rampant criming, and him finally, FINALLY being held accountable (maybe?) is bad news for Democrats.

Anyway you know who it's good news for? Ron DeSantis. He is loving this.

Anonymous wrote:I hope the Democrats know what they are doing here. For every action there is a reaction. To go after Trump like the way they are doing. It’s going to bite the current admin come next year. Just saying. 🌈

"democrats" aren't doing this. Law Enforcement, however, is.

Law is blind to anything but facts uncovering crimes.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

that FBI agents went to Mar-a-Lago and looked in every single office, safe, and grabbed documents and boxes without going through them on the property. They took boxes and documents to go through them later.

No matter your politics, no one has an issue with this? The police taking stuff just to see if anything is there? Wow.

They get a search warrant from the courts, dummy. Which means they had to show probable cause that a crime was committed (like stealing 15 boxes of classified material, then not returning all of it).

Irony: if a “Trump judge” issued the search warrant 😆

If you have not forgotten. Judge's rulings are not supposed to be influenced by their politics/sponsor.

Hmmm, tell it to the Federalist Society Supreme Court.

Anonymous wrote:I hope the Democrats know what they are doing here. For every action there is a reaction. To go after Trump like the way they are doing. It’s going to bite the current admin come next year. Just saying. 🌈

What if they’re just going after top secret documents he stole? I mean at least the ones he wasn’t able to flush down the toilet.

Anonymous wrote:I read comments that the president or a presidential candidate can't be charged with crimes. If that is true, please help my boggled mind understand it. No matter what party you are affiliated with, you should think that is bad.

He is not The President or a Candidate at this point....

Is there any chance that incriminating documents would still be at Mar-A-Lago at this point?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s on the front page (web and paper) of every news organization this morning?

The FBI raid or Biden’s IRA legislation??

The legislation didn’t pass yesterday so it’s going to be the search warrant (stop calling it a raid.)

Even liberal news sources (ex: CNN) are referring to the “raid by FBI”. Keep up.

Because that’s how Trump referred to it.

Interesting….Andrew Cuomo (Democrat): “DOJ must immediately explain the reason for its raid & it must be more than a search for inconsequential archives or it will be viewed as a political tactic and undermine any future credible investigation & legitimacy of January 6 investigations.”

I guess the liberals didn’t get your memo not to use the word “raid”. Maybe send them an email.

I read comments that the president or a presidential candidate can't be charged with crimes. If that is true, please help my boggled mind understand it. No matter what party you are affiliated with, you should think that is bad.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:Fact:

What does this have to do with anything?

Does the law suddenly not apply to Donnie just because, at some later date, he might announce he is running for president?

I don't recall Republicans complaining that HRC was under investigation when she was running for president or that Bill Clinton was under investigation when he was in the White House.

Her home was never searched and it should have been because she had a “private server” at her home holding public records. But they didn’t. This is absolutely politically motivated. Garland has weaponized the justice department to a degree not seen since Hoover. Well done.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:What’s on the front page (web and paper) of every news organization this morning?

The FBI raid or Biden’s IRA legislation??

The legislation didn’t pass yesterday so it’s going to be the search warrant (stop calling it a raid.)

Even liberal news sources (ex: CNN) are referring to the “raid by FBI”. Keep up.

Because that’s how Trump referred to it.

Why did Trump continue to refuse to return all the documents? What is he hiding?