Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:It is way to complicated to change it.
Also, it wouldn’t even eliminate the college swimmer issue since some have birthdays after swim season. If you want to eliminate college swimmers you could propose that rule directly but it won’t pass.
People were saying the same thing about kids wearing caps from their club teams. They changed that rule last year. So they do occasionally change the rules. With the lady whose son swam above age at nearly every level leading the rules committee I agree that a proposal related to reclassifying age groups won’t go far.
Anonymous wrote:It is way to complicated to change it.
Also, it wouldn’t even eliminate the college swimmer issue since some have birthdays after swim season. If you want to eliminate college swimmers you could propose that rule directly but it won’t pass.
Huh? So it's unfair that a kid is good enough to win at both 17 and 18 yo? You want them to sit out so your kid can win at 18 yo because your kid is old for their grade or were redshirted? What if the other kid wasn't winning at 17 yo but matures and then is good enough to win for the first time at 18 yo? Is that unfair?Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I skipped a grade and turned 18 in March of my freshman year of college. Why can’t I compete as an 18 year old in an 18 and under league? Not a 19 year old, or even an old 18 year old. I was a year and a half younger than most of my classmates - grew later, drove later, etc. Let me have this one thing!
So as a college sophomore you would have wanted to spend your summer participating in summer swim with a group of high school kids and younger, none of whom were your classmates? Sure![]()
Yes. I was the coach and taught swim lessons and lifeguarded. It was my summer job. And I swam in the meets, with people who I had been teammates with for years and were on my high school team. It’s not like I was competing against the 8 year olds. The funny thing is that even though I was a Division I swimmer, I was a distance swimmer, so I wasn’t very good at the summer league sprint races. But I wasn’t trying to rack up medals, it was something done for fun.
So were you getting first place in your events at All Stars, or were high schoolers beating you? I posted that I think it’s pathetic because I would have won my events easily being a stroke and IM swimmer. That would have felt so empty considering I had access to NCAA training with certified strength and conditioning coaches at a university in a power conference. I could see it being a little different if you’re a distance swimmer at a smaller D1 program. There’s a wide range even within D1.
The example of a 17 year old high schooler placing at National is different. That high schooler is doing USA club swim training like everyone else in high school. That’s a more even playing field.
I wasn’t winning. I swam random things like breaststroke that I didn’t swim in college. I think I swam 50 free and was like 4th or 5th. The others in the heat were also going to swim in college. We were the same age. My high school club swim training was basically the same as my DI college swim training, I’m not sure why people think there is a big difference. The senior groups at clubs like NCAP or RMSC are as high level training as you can get.
Also not sure why people think that regular swimmers don’t want to compete against high level swimmers. I know someone who swam against Katie Ledecky at a high school meet. Katie won easily without
even trying. But the other kids there thought it was cool, and they can always say they raced Katie Ledecky. What’s wrong with that?
A random high school meet is different from someone’s final summer swim meet after competing their entire childhood. It is in poor taste for someone who won their events (or close to it) at 17 to then come back after a year of D1 swimming and win everything again. That takes the opportunity away from an 18 year old senior who won’t be able to come back after a year of college. There’s a time to be in the spotlight and a time to let others shine.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I skipped a grade and turned 18 in March of my freshman year of college. Why can’t I compete as an 18 year old in an 18 and under league? Not a 19 year old, or even an old 18 year old. I was a year and a half younger than most of my classmates - grew later, drove later, etc. Let me have this one thing!
So as a college sophomore you would have wanted to spend your summer participating in summer swim with a group of high school kids and younger, none of whom were your classmates? Sure![]()
Yes. I was the coach and taught swim lessons and lifeguarded. It was my summer job. And I swam in the meets, with people who I had been teammates with for years and were on my high school team. It’s not like I was competing against the 8 year olds. The funny thing is that even though I was a Division I swimmer, I was a distance swimmer, so I wasn’t very good at the summer league sprint races. But I wasn’t trying to rack up medals, it was something done for fun.
So were you getting first place in your events at All Stars, or were high schoolers beating you? I posted that I think it’s pathetic because I would have won my events easily being a stroke and IM swimmer. That would have felt so empty considering I had access to NCAA training with certified strength and conditioning coaches at a university in a power conference. I could see it being a little different if you’re a distance swimmer at a smaller D1 program. There’s a wide range even within D1.
The example of a 17 year old high schooler placing at National is different. That high schooler is doing USA club swim training like everyone else in high school. That’s a more even playing field.
I wasn’t winning. I swam random things like breaststroke that I didn’t swim in college. I think I swam 50 free and was like 4th or 5th. The others in the heat were also going to swim in college. We were the same age. My high school club swim training was basically the same as my DI college swim training, I’m not sure why people think there is a big difference. The senior groups at clubs like NCAP or RMSC are as high level training as you can get.
Also not sure why people think that regular swimmers don’t want to compete against high level swimmers. I know someone who swam against Katie Ledecky at a high school meet. Katie won easily without
even trying. But the other kids there thought it was cool, and they can always say they raced Katie Ledecky. What’s wrong with that?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I skipped a grade and turned 18 in March of my freshman year of college. Why can’t I compete as an 18 year old in an 18 and under league? Not a 19 year old, or even an old 18 year old. I was a year and a half younger than most of my classmates - grew later, drove later, etc. Let me have this one thing!
So as a college sophomore you would have wanted to spend your summer participating in summer swim with a group of high school kids and younger, none of whom were your classmates? Sure![]()
Yes. I was the coach and taught swim lessons and lifeguarded. It was my summer job. And I swam in the meets, with people who I had been teammates with for years and were on my high school team. It’s not like I was competing against the 8 year olds. The funny thing is that even though I was a Division I swimmer, I was a distance swimmer, so I wasn’t very good at the summer league sprint races. But I wasn’t trying to rack up medals, it was something done for fun.
So were you getting first place in your events at All Stars, or were high schoolers beating you? I posted that I think it’s pathetic because I would have won my events easily being a stroke and IM swimmer. That would have felt so empty considering I had access to NCAA training with certified strength and conditioning coaches at a university in a power conference. I could see it being a little different if you’re a distance swimmer at a smaller D1 program. There’s a wide range even within D1.
The example of a 17 year old high schooler placing at National is different. That high schooler is doing USA club swim training like everyone else in high school. That’s a more even playing field.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the basic problem when it comes down to it is that there is a 24 month window for the 9-10, 11-12 and 13-14 groups. If the cutoff was sep 1 then you'd have "8" year olds in the 9-10 group. Right now, just like in ANY OTHER youth league you have the kids at the older end and yes, this means that a kid who has a july 1 birthday (and will turn 11 then) will be swimming the season as 9-10 and be 22 months older than a kid who turned 9 on may 1. There is no answer to fix this problem EXCEPT to make the groups smaller in age (12 month window instead of 24) but then things would take forever to run (unless you combined the heats, but then you'd have to figure out who "won" from the 9 year old sets later). And then you'll still have some kids 11 months older than others in their bracket. Taken to extremes you could have a separate category for every season or every month even with separate records/times for each but hopefully everyone thinks that is absurd.
No, it’s not like any other youth league. That’s bc club swim cuts it off whatever your age is the first day of a meet. It’s is not as if club swim - even ymca USA swimming- follows these rules for summer or any other time.
It's like every youth league that's a team sport. Summer swimming is a team sport, like baseball or soccer. Those all have age cut offs.Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:the basic problem when it comes down to it is that there is a 24 month window for the 9-10, 11-12 and 13-14 groups. If the cutoff was sep 1 then you'd have "8" year olds in the 9-10 group. Right now, just like in ANY OTHER youth league you have the kids at the older end and yes, this means that a kid who has a july 1 birthday (and will turn 11 then) will be swimming the season as 9-10 and be 22 months older than a kid who turned 9 on may 1. There is no answer to fix this problem EXCEPT to make the groups smaller in age (12 month window instead of 24) but then things would take forever to run (unless you combined the heats, but then you'd have to figure out who "won" from the 9 year old sets later). And then you'll still have some kids 11 months older than others in their bracket. Taken to extremes you could have a separate category for every season or every month even with separate records/times for each but hopefully everyone thinks that is absurd.
No, it’s not like any other youth league. That’s bc club swim cuts it off whatever your age is the first day of a meet. It’s is not as if club swim - even ymca USA swimming- follows these rules for summer or any other time.
Anonymous wrote:the basic problem when it comes down to it is that there is a 24 month window for the 9-10, 11-12 and 13-14 groups. If the cutoff was sep 1 then you'd have "8" year olds in the 9-10 group. Right now, just like in ANY OTHER youth league you have the kids at the older end and yes, this means that a kid who has a july 1 birthday (and will turn 11 then) will be swimming the season as 9-10 and be 22 months older than a kid who turned 9 on may 1. There is no answer to fix this problem EXCEPT to make the groups smaller in age (12 month window instead of 24) but then things would take forever to run (unless you combined the heats, but then you'd have to figure out who "won" from the 9 year old sets later). And then you'll still have some kids 11 months older than others in their bracket. Taken to extremes you could have a separate category for every season or every month even with separate records/times for each but hopefully everyone thinks that is absurd.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I skipped a grade and turned 18 in March of my freshman year of college. Why can’t I compete as an 18 year old in an 18 and under league? Not a 19 year old, or even an old 18 year old. I was a year and a half younger than most of my classmates - grew later, drove later, etc. Let me have this one thing!
So as a college sophomore you would have wanted to spend your summer participating in summer swim with a group of high school kids and younger, none of whom were your classmates? Sure![]()
Yes. I was the coach and taught swim lessons and lifeguarded. It was my summer job. And I swam in the meets, with people who I had been teammates with for years and were on my high school team. It’s not like I was competing against the 8 year olds. The funny thing is that even though I was a Division I swimmer, I was a distance swimmer, so I wasn’t very good at the summer league sprint races. But I wasn’t trying to rack up medals, it was something done for fun.
So were you getting first place in your events at All Stars, or were high schoolers beating you? I posted that I think it’s pathetic because I would have won my events easily being a stroke and IM swimmer. That would have felt so empty considering I had access to NCAA training with certified strength and conditioning coaches at a university in a power conference. I could see it being a little different if you’re a distance swimmer at a smaller D1 program. There’s a wide range even within D1.
The example of a 17 year old high schooler placing at National is different. That high schooler is doing USA club swim training like everyone else in high school. That’s a more even playing field.
Genuine question from a non club swim parent, a person who is ranked 2nd in the country right behind a decorated Olympian is doing the training as the kids on my local high school team? And the training that person is doing is less than a D1 swimmer?
E G is effectively doing D1 training, as are a lot of kids who aren't as good.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every kid who competes is normal and age appropriate. They all meet the cut off.Anonymous wrote:My kids make All Stars at the top and bottom of each age group, so I don’t have a personal stake in this. But I will say that the other kids who make Divisionals and All Stars are majority “older than the age group” kids. Which means normal non-star age-appropriate kids are not getting to swim those meets.
I would be in favor of a rule change for that reason. Swim your actual age.
Age appropriate like the PP said. If you are swimming 11-12, you should not be 13.
They are not the age that they are swimming. They generally are a grade ahead and they are older. Parents don't want to change it with the summer birthdays because now their child would have to swim against kids their own age and would not do as well.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Every kid who competes is normal and age appropriate. They all meet the cut off.Anonymous wrote:My kids make All Stars at the top and bottom of each age group, so I don’t have a personal stake in this. But I will say that the other kids who make Divisionals and All Stars are majority “older than the age group” kids. Which means normal non-star age-appropriate kids are not getting to swim those meets.
I would be in favor of a rule change for that reason. Swim your actual age.
Age appropriate like the PP said. If you are swimming 11-12, you should not be 13.
They are not the age that they are swimming. They generally are a grade ahead and they are older. Parents don't want to change it with the summer birthdays because now their child would have to swim against kids their own age and would not do as well.