Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How, if in Texas everyone is ok with just buying an assault rifle at a local sporting goods store, do police not have a supply of them to bring to such a situation? Don’t they have those armored vehicles we bought them?
And couldn’t they have just gone to the same sporting goods store and picked up the same gun and rounds of ammunition as they leisurely drove to the school?
I am sure the truth of what happened is even worse than what the police are sharing, though it strains me to imagine how that could be at this point.
They had the weaponry. The did not have the tactical equipment to protect themselves. They still should have gone in
Why do we have a militarized police force that is too scared or unprepared to actually protect people when they need it.
Between these gutsy bad-ass heroes (pictured above) and, get this,![]()
![]()
"a proper perimeter fence" locked doors and "signs posted saying that adults on premise were armed and ready to engage"
![]()
![]()
and we're all set!
Oh, wait...
There were no locked doors, nor a proper perimeter fence aimed at deterrence. Nor signs. There was no equipment at the scene. And yes, their actions were a problem. I’m more concerned that the gunman had such easy access in this day and age. Was he known to law enforcement. He did pass a background check so that didn’t work.
Schools aren't built like prisons. In general, they don't have proper perimeter fences, since students walk in from the neighborhood. Some schools lock doors but not all - upper schools with open campuses cannot lock doors. Locally, in the DMV, nearly all elementary schools lock doors but nearly all also have trailers that are unsecured.
The solution is not to put up higher fences. Think outside of your box.
Robb Elementary had a perimeter fence! The shooter climbed the fence while holding an AR-15, then ran across the athletic field to the nearest building.
These idiots literally want our kids to go to school surrounded by razor wire, instead of banning semi-automatic weapons. It's so f#cking gross and narcissistic.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How, if in Texas everyone is ok with just buying an assault rifle at a local sporting goods store, do police not have a supply of them to bring to such a situation? Don’t they have those armored vehicles we bought them?
And couldn’t they have just gone to the same sporting goods store and picked up the same gun and rounds of ammunition as they leisurely drove to the school?
I am sure the truth of what happened is even worse than what the police are sharing, though it strains me to imagine how that could be at this point.
They had the weaponry. The did not have the tactical equipment to protect themselves. They still should have gone in
Why do we have a militarized police force that is too scared or unprepared to actually protect people when they need it.
Between these gutsy bad-ass heroes (pictured above) and, get this,![]()
![]()
"a proper perimeter fence" locked doors and "signs posted saying that adults on premise were armed and ready to engage"
![]()
![]()
and we're all set!
Oh, wait...
There were no locked doors, nor a proper perimeter fence aimed at deterrence. Nor signs. There was no equipment at the scene. And yes, their actions were a problem. I’m more concerned that the gunman had such easy access in this day and age. Was he known to law enforcement. He did pass a background check so that didn’t work.
Schools aren't built like prisons. In general, they don't have proper perimeter fences, since students walk in from the neighborhood. Some schools lock doors but not all - upper schools with open campuses cannot lock doors. Locally, in the DMV, nearly all elementary schools lock doors but nearly all also have trailers that are unsecured.
The solution is not to put up higher fences. Think outside of your box.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How, if in Texas everyone is ok with just buying an assault rifle at a local sporting goods store, do police not have a supply of them to bring to such a situation? Don’t they have those armored vehicles we bought them?
And couldn’t they have just gone to the same sporting goods store and picked up the same gun and rounds of ammunition as they leisurely drove to the school?
I am sure the truth of what happened is even worse than what the police are sharing, though it strains me to imagine how that could be at this point.
They had the weaponry. The did not have the tactical equipment to protect themselves. They still should have gone in
Why do we have a militarized police force that is too scared or unprepared to actually protect people when they need it.
Between these gutsy bad-ass heroes (pictured above) and, get this,![]()
![]()
"a proper perimeter fence" locked doors and "signs posted saying that adults on premise were armed and ready to engage"
![]()
![]()
and we're all set!
Oh, wait...
There were no locked doors, nor a proper perimeter fence aimed at deterrence. Nor signs. There was no equipment at the scene. And yes, their actions were a problem. I’m more concerned that the gunman had such easy access in this day and age. Was he known to law enforcement. He did pass a background check so that didn’t work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How, if in Texas everyone is ok with just buying an assault rifle at a local sporting goods store, do police not have a supply of them to bring to such a situation? Don’t they have those armored vehicles we bought them?
And couldn’t they have just gone to the same sporting goods store and picked up the same gun and rounds of ammunition as they leisurely drove to the school?
I am sure the truth of what happened is even worse than what the police are sharing, though it strains me to imagine how that could be at this point.
They had the weaponry. The did not have the tactical equipment to protect themselves. They still should have gone in
Why do we have a militarized police force that is too scared or unprepared to actually protect people when they need it.
Between these gutsy bad-ass heroes (pictured above) and, get this,![]()
![]()
"a proper perimeter fence" locked doors and "signs posted saying that adults on premise were armed and ready to engage"
![]()
![]()
and we're all set!
Oh, wait...
There were no locked doors, nor a proper perimeter fence aimed at deterrence. Nor signs. There was no equipment at the scene. And yes, their actions were a problem. I’m more concerned that the gunman had such easy access in this day and age. Was he known to law enforcement. He did pass a background check so that didn’t work.
Schools aren't built like prisons. In general, they don't have proper perimeter fences, since students walk in from the neighborhood. Some schools lock doors but not all - upper schools with open campuses cannot lock doors. Locally, in the DMV, nearly all elementary schools lock doors but nearly all also have trailers that are unsecured.
The solution is not to put up higher fences. Think outside of your box.
Anonymous wrote:Every school in America can simply lock their doors today. Easy, available, and very helpful. Or they can leave them all open. What you do a week from now is up to you. Where you send your money is up to you. What you support is up to you. But simply locking a door costs nothing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How, if in Texas everyone is ok with just buying an assault rifle at a local sporting goods store, do police not have a supply of them to bring to such a situation? Don’t they have those armored vehicles we bought them?
And couldn’t they have just gone to the same sporting goods store and picked up the same gun and rounds of ammunition as they leisurely drove to the school?
I am sure the truth of what happened is even worse than what the police are sharing, though it strains me to imagine how that could be at this point.
They had the weaponry. The did not have the tactical equipment to protect themselves. They still should have gone in
Why do we have a militarized police force that is too scared or unprepared to actually protect people when they need it.
Between these gutsy bad-ass heroes (pictured above) and, get this,![]()
![]()
"a proper perimeter fence" locked doors and "signs posted saying that adults on premise were armed and ready to engage"
![]()
![]()
and we're all set!
Oh, wait...
There were no locked doors, nor a proper perimeter fence aimed at deterrence. Nor signs. There was no equipment at the scene. And yes, their actions were a problem. I’m more concerned that the gunman had such easy access in this day and age. Was he known to law enforcement. He did pass a background check so that didn’t work.
Anonymous wrote:Every school in America can simply lock their doors today. Easy, available, and very helpful. Or they can leave them all open. What you do a week from now is up to you. Where you send your money is up to you. What you support is up to you. But simply locking a door costs nothing.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know what would solve this problem? Police in schools. OH we have police in schools? Well then, MORE police in schools. Maybe we should just make schools into police stations. That will solve our problems!
No, we need sharpshooters in every school. At every possible entrance.
Duh.
There was no armed officer inside the school and the doors were unlocked, and children died. No amount of your sarcasm can change that. But if the doors were locked and there was an armed officer inside, chances are that the gunman would not have gotten in at all.
If an 18yo couldn’t buy an AR-15 he wouldn’t have been there at all.
Exactly.
Do all these armed guard folks work for the gun industry? Funny how the nra solution involves thousands and thousands of schools districts having to buy more and more weapons. F off nra. We want less of these horrible weapons, not more
THANK YOU
I don't WANT to live in a world that is set up like a prison! I want people not to be walking around with military weapons that any violent yahoo can buy from a corner effing stoe!
There will still be violent crime. Plenty of it in fact. Who said prison? Do you lock your home doors and windows? Is there any sort of fence around your yard, perhaps to keep your pet from running off or simply for privacy? Do you have a house alarm? Ring doorbells? Cameras? Most private homes have at least a few of these preventative items/actions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know what would solve this problem? Police in schools. OH we have police in schools? Well then, MORE police in schools. Maybe we should just make schools into police stations. That will solve our problems!
No, we need sharpshooters in every school. At every possible entrance.
Duh.
There was no armed officer inside the school and the doors were unlocked, and children died. No amount of your sarcasm can change that. But if the doors were locked and there was an armed officer inside, chances are that the gunman would not have gotten in at all.
If an 18yo couldn’t buy an AR-15 he wouldn’t have been there at all.
Exactly.
Do all these armed guard folks work for the gun industry? Funny how the nra solution involves thousands and thousands of schools districts having to buy more and more weapons. F off nra. We want less of these horrible weapons, not more
THANK YOU
I don't WANT to live in a world that is set up like a prison! I want people not to be walking around with military weapons that any violent yahoo can buy from a corner effing stoe!
There will still be violent crime. Plenty of it in fact. Who said prison? Do you lock your home doors and windows? Is there any sort of fence around your yard, perhaps to keep your pet from running off or simply for privacy? Do you have a house alarm? Ring doorbells? Cameras? Most private homes have at least a few of these preventative items/actions.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How, if in Texas everyone is ok with just buying an assault rifle at a local sporting goods store, do police not have a supply of them to bring to such a situation? Don’t they have those armored vehicles we bought them?
And couldn’t they have just gone to the same sporting goods store and picked up the same gun and rounds of ammunition as they leisurely drove to the school?
I am sure the truth of what happened is even worse than what the police are sharing, though it strains me to imagine how that could be at this point.
They had the weaponry. The did not have the tactical equipment to protect themselves. They still should have gone in
Why do we have a militarized police force that is too scared or unprepared to actually protect people when they need it.
Between these gutsy bad-ass heroes (pictured above) and, get this,![]()
![]()
"a proper perimeter fence" locked doors and "signs posted saying that adults on premise were armed and ready to engage"
![]()
![]()
and we're all set!
Oh, wait...
There were no locked doors, nor a proper perimeter fence aimed at deterrence. Nor signs. There was no equipment at the scene. And yes, their actions were a problem. I’m more concerned that the gunman had such easy access in this day and age. Was he known to law enforcement. He did pass a background check so that didn’t work.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:You know what would solve this problem? Police in schools. OH we have police in schools? Well then, MORE police in schools. Maybe we should just make schools into police stations. That will solve our problems!
No, we need sharpshooters in every school. At every possible entrance.
Duh.
There was no armed officer inside the school and the doors were unlocked, and children died. No amount of your sarcasm can change that. But if the doors were locked and there was an armed officer inside, chances are that the gunman would not have gotten in at all.
If an 18yo couldn’t buy an AR-15 he wouldn’t have been there at all.
Exactly.
Do all these armed guard folks work for the gun industry? Funny how the nra solution involves thousands and thousands of schools districts having to buy more and more weapons. F off nra. We want less of these horrible weapons, not more
THANK YOU
I don't WANT to live in a world that is set up like a prison! I want people not to be walking around with military weapons that any violent yahoo can buy from a corner effing stoe!
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How, if in Texas everyone is ok with just buying an assault rifle at a local sporting goods store, do police not have a supply of them to bring to such a situation? Don’t they have those armored vehicles we bought them?
And couldn’t they have just gone to the same sporting goods store and picked up the same gun and rounds of ammunition as they leisurely drove to the school?
I am sure the truth of what happened is even worse than what the police are sharing, though it strains me to imagine how that could be at this point.
They had the weaponry. The did not have the tactical equipment to protect themselves. They still should have gone in
Why do we have a militarized police force that is too scared or unprepared to actually protect people when they need it.
Between these gutsy bad-ass heroes (pictured above) and, get this,![]()
![]()
"a proper perimeter fence" locked doors and "signs posted saying that adults on premise were armed and ready to engage"
![]()
![]()
and we're all set!
Oh, wait...
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How, if in Texas everyone is ok with just buying an assault rifle at a local sporting goods store, do police not have a supply of them to bring to such a situation? Don’t they have those armored vehicles we bought them?
And couldn’t they have just gone to the same sporting goods store and picked up the same gun and rounds of ammunition as they leisurely drove to the school?
I am sure the truth of what happened is even worse than what the police are sharing, though it strains me to imagine how that could be at this point.
They had the weaponry. The did not have the tactical equipment to protect themselves. They still should have gone in
Why do we have a militarized police force that is too scared or unprepared to actually protect people when they need it.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:How, if in Texas everyone is ok with just buying an assault rifle at a local sporting goods store, do police not have a supply of them to bring to such a situation? Don’t they have those armored vehicles we bought them?
And couldn’t they have just gone to the same sporting goods store and picked up the same gun and rounds of ammunition as they leisurely drove to the school?
I am sure the truth of what happened is even worse than what the police are sharing, though it strains me to imagine how that could be at this point.
They had the weaponry. The did not have the tactical equipment to protect themselves. They still should have gone in
Why do we have a militarized police force that is too scared or unprepared to actually protect people when they need it.
"a proper perimeter fence" locked doors and "signs posted saying that adults on premise were armed and ready to engage"
and we're all set!