Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:I heard on cnn the mother is dead.
I do not think this has been proven yet but I think most everyone already has drawn this conclusion at this stage.
I mean what are the chances that an 84YO woman could be forcefully taken from her home during the night, lose a small amount of blood then go over two wks w/out her necessary daily medication that is keeping her alive??
Plus whoever kidnapped Nancy would have to physically care for her all day as well as keep her healthy as possible.
They would need to watch her constantly to ensure she does not escape too.
It would be a whole lot of work.
I highly doubt an 84YO could physically ➕ emotionally endure such a brutal abduction and hostage situation for over two wks - - especially when she has a weak heart.[/quote
It's also highly possible she died in the struggle before they even took her.
Anonymous wrote:I heard on cnn the mother is dead.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:no longer on the cnn homepage
The glove was a bust I assume
Yes that’s what I’m seeing - the glove is a bust and next step is to determine if there’s any dna that could identify family members who might know who the perp is.
Also, how could someone have been in her home for 30 minutes, presumably handling Nancy, and not left any DNA?
It is not in CODIS is what I have read. Not sure why they are not running it through 23andme (yes, I know they are bankrupt) or something like them.
So many people with zero understanding gave their DNA to them. I would bet a connection could be made.
FBI can't just "run it through 23andme" since 23andme has refused to cooperate with government or law enforcement.
From the NYT:
Day 18: Where Things Stand
No Match: Investigators said DNA on gloves found near Nancy Guthrie’s house did not return a match. They are looking into using investigative genetic genealogy, in which DNA is compared with consumer ancestry databases to build a family tree.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:no longer on the cnn homepage
The glove was a bust I assume
Yes that’s what I’m seeing - the glove is a bust and next step is to determine if there’s any dna that could identify family members who might know who the perp is.
Also, how could someone have been in her home for 30 minutes, presumably handling Nancy, and not left any DNA?
It is not in CODIS is what I have read. Not sure why they are not running it through 23andme (yes, I know they are bankrupt) or something like them.
So many people with zero understanding gave their DNA to them. I would bet a connection could be made.
FBI can't just "run it through 23andme" since 23andme has refused to cooperate with government or law enforcement.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:no longer on the cnn homepage
The glove was a bust I assume
Yes that’s what I’m seeing - the glove is a bust and next step is to determine if there’s any dna that could identify family members who might know who the perp is.
Also, how could someone have been in her home for 30 minutes, presumably handling Nancy, and not left any DNA?
It is not in CODIS is what I have read. Not sure why they are not running it through 23andme (yes, I know they are bankrupt) or something like them.
So many people with zero understanding gave their DNA to them. I would bet a connection could be made.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:no longer on the cnn homepage
The glove was a bust I assume
Yes that’s what I’m seeing - the glove is a bust and next step is to determine if there’s any dna that could identify family members who might know who the perp is.
Also, how could someone have been in her home for 30 minutes, presumably handling Nancy, and not left any DNA?
It is not in CODIS is what I have read. Not sure why they are not running it through 23andme (yes, I know they are bankrupt) or something like them.
So many people with zero understanding gave their DNA to them. I would bet a connection could be made.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:no longer on the cnn homepage
The glove was a bust I assume
Yes that’s what I’m seeing - the glove is a bust and next step is to determine if there’s any dna that could identify family members who might know who the perp is.
Also, how could someone have been in her home for 30 minutes, presumably handling Nancy, and not left any DNA?
It is not in CODIS is what I have read. Not sure why they are not running it through 23andme (yes, I know they are bankrupt) or something like them.
So many people with zero understanding gave their DNA to them. I would bet a connection could be made.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:no longer on the cnn homepage
The glove was a bust I assume
Yes that’s what I’m seeing - the glove is a bust and next step is to determine if there’s any dna that could identify family members who might know who the perp is.
Also, how could someone have been in her home for 30 minutes, presumably handling Nancy, and not left any DNA?
It is not in CODIS is what I have read. Not sure why they are not running it through 23andme (yes, I know they are bankrupt) or something like them.
So many people with zero understanding gave their DNA to them. I would bet a connection could be made.
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:no longer on the cnn homepage
The glove was a bust I assume
Yes that’s what I’m seeing - the glove is a bust and next step is to determine if there’s any dna that could identify family members who might know who the perp is.
Also, how could someone have been in her home for 30 minutes, presumably handling Nancy, and not left any DNA?
Anonymous wrote:Anonymous wrote:no longer on the cnn homepage
The glove was a bust I assume
Anonymous wrote:no longer on the cnn homepage