Anonymous wrote:The prosecutors, defense, and jury were alll shocked when Cassie said while on the stand that she also sued the Intercontinental hotel and received an additional 10 million dollars as well. She didn’t tell the prosecutors that beforehand and decided to share that while on the stand even though it made their case look bad. She didn’t seem to realize this because she isn’t smart

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m curious what the makeup of the jury was. Race? Gender? Education? They seem thick.

It seems like you don't know anything about the jury but you have decided that they are "thick". Thick why, because they delivered a verdict that you don't agree with?

It was 8 women and 4 men. That would've help the Prosecution team. THe race it was in New York, so I am guessing it somewhat like you will see in the DMV, white, black and browns etc.

I heard it was 8 men 4 women

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m curious what the makeup of the jury was. Race? Gender? Education? They seem thick.

It seems like you don't know anything about the jury but you have decided that they are "thick". Thick why, because they delivered a verdict that you don't agree with?

It was 8 women and 4 men. That would've help the Prosecution team. THe race it was in New York, so I am guessing it somewhat like you will see in the DMV, white, black and browns etc.

I heard it was 8 men 4 women

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This judge denied bail previously stating he was a danger to society and victims. Had a vibe early on that the judge probably hoped for a stronger verdict. Would be great if he’s sentenced max total 20 years. At minimum 10 years— 2 five year consecutive.

20 years means he may die in prison. He’s 55 years old

I don’t care, do you? 20 years would support justice for the victims. Cassie and Jane weren’t the only victims. Diddy physically assaulted his staff, including men!
C’mon. He’s scum. Judge delivers sentencing. And I do think he expected a harsher verdict, therefore, think he’ll deliver a harsher sentence.

Cassie uses methadone for her drug addiction. If you saw how these women in Hollywood operate and the drugs they use, you would not feel much sympathy for them. Harvey Weinstein and Diddy are pure examples for why promiscuity is dangerous to males and how money and power provide men who aren’t handsome the opportunity to control the pretty women they strongly resent for not being able to get before money and fame

Disagree. Cassie is a victim and you cannot change this. She clearly has problems but the whole hollywood industry preys on insecurity and so many young people get sucked in. I am sure it was hard for her to testify. The problem is this case was not a case that addressed what happened to her.

What happened to her was DV which was not addressed in any of these charges. Not even one count of assault was placed despite the hotel tape. Coercion was placed instead based on Cassie’s lie that she was forced to do the freakoffs. Before this criminal case, she came out with a lengthy statement to the public where she says she was abused and coerced into prostitution yet maybe she didn’t understand the meaning of prostitution because Diddy was never paid for any of this. This was not a money making enterprise for him. He was spending money.

Racketeering would require some element of profiteering here. The only profiteer it turns out was Cassie. She received money and gifts and retired her parents thanks to her relationship with Diddy. The most damning message is the one where Diddy asks (multiple times at different occasions) if she wants to stop the freakoffs and she says no, never.

Cassie is the link that ruined this case

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m curious what the makeup of the jury was. Race? Gender? Education? They seem thick.

It seems like you don't know anything about the jury but you have decided that they are "thick". Thick why, because they delivered a verdict that you don't agree with?

It was 8 women and 4 men. That would've help the Prosecution team. THe race it was in New York, so I am guessing it somewhat like you will see in the DMV, white, black and browns etc.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m curious what the makeup of the jury was. Race? Gender? Education? They seem thick.

It seems like you don't know anything about the jury but you have decided that they are "thick". Thick why, because they delivered a verdict that you don't agree with?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This judge denied bail previously stating he was a danger to society and victims. Had a vibe early on that the judge probably hoped for a stronger verdict. Would be great if he’s sentenced max total 20 years. At minimum 10 years— 2 five year consecutive.

20 years means he may die in prison. He’s 55 years old

I don’t care, do you? 20 years would support justice for the victims. Cassie and Jane weren’t the only victims. Diddy physically assaulted his staff, including men!
C’mon. He’s scum. Judge delivers sentencing. And I do think he expected a harsher verdict, therefore, think he’ll deliver a harsher sentence.

Cassie uses methadone for her drug addiction. If you saw how these women in Hollywood operate and the drugs they use, you would not feel much sympathy for them. Harvey Weinstein and Diddy are pure examples for why promiscuity is dangerous to males and how money and power provide men who aren’t handsome the opportunity to control the pretty women they strongly resent for not being able to get before money and fame

Disagree. Cassie is a victim and you cannot change this. She clearly has problems but the whole hollywood industry preys on insecurity and so many young people get sucked in. I am sure it was hard for her to testify. The problem is this case was not a case that addressed what happened to her.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:I’m curious what the makeup of the jury was. Race? Gender? Education? They seem thick.

It seems like you don't know anything about the jury but you have decided that they are "thick". Thick why, because they delivered a verdict that you don't agree with?

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This judge denied bail previously stating he was a danger to society and victims. Had a vibe early on that the judge probably hoped for a stronger verdict. Would be great if he’s sentenced max total 20 years. At minimum 10 years— 2 five year consecutive.

20 years means he may die in prison. He’s 55 years old

I don’t care, do you? 20 years would support justice for the victims. Cassie and Jane weren’t the only victims. Diddy physically assaulted his staff, including men!
C’mon. He’s scum. Judge delivers sentencing. And I do think he expected a harsher verdict, therefore, think he’ll deliver a harsher sentence.

Cassie uses methadone for her drug addiction. If you saw how these women in Hollywood operate and the drugs they use, you would not feel much sympathy for them. Harvey Weinstein and Diddy are pure examples for why promiscuity is dangerous to males and how money and power provide men who aren’t handsome the opportunity to control the pretty women they strongly resent for not being able to get before money and fame

Disagree. Cassie is a victim and you cannot change this. She clearly has problems but the whole hollywood industry preys on insecurity and so many young people get sucked in. I am sure it was hard for her to testify. The problem is this case was not a case that addressed what happened to her.

For this case to have been about what happened to Cassie, wouldn't she have had to press charges herself, years ago when the hotel incident took place?

Anonymous wrote:I’m curious what the makeup of the jury was. Race? Gender? Education? They seem thick.

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:

Anonymous wrote:This judge denied bail previously stating he was a danger to society and victims. Had a vibe early on that the judge probably hoped for a stronger verdict. Would be great if he’s sentenced max total 20 years. At minimum 10 years— 2 five year consecutive.

20 years means he may die in prison. He’s 55 years old

I don’t care, do you? 20 years would support justice for the victims. Cassie and Jane weren’t the only victims. Diddy physically assaulted his staff, including men!
C’mon. He’s scum. Judge delivers sentencing. And I do think he expected a harsher verdict, therefore, think he’ll deliver a harsher sentence.

Cassie uses methadone for her drug addiction. If you saw how these women in Hollywood operate and the drugs they use, you would not feel much sympathy for them. Harvey Weinstein and Diddy are pure examples for why promiscuity is dangerous to males and how money and power provide men who aren’t handsome the opportunity to control the pretty women they strongly resent for not being able to get before money and fame

Disagree. Cassie is a victim and you cannot change this. She clearly has problems but the whole hollywood industry preys on insecurity and so many young people get sucked in. I am sure it was hard for her to testify. The problem is this case was not a case that addressed what happened to her.